General Motors introduces 2 new direct injected engines for 2010
Filed under: MPG, Chevrolet, GM
For 2010 General Motors is adding two new high volume direct injected engines two its lineup. The latest addition to the EcoTec four cylinder family is a normally aspirated 2.4L with variable valve timing. The four cylinder engine has dished pistons and an 11.4:1 compression ratio. The result is 180 hp at 6,700 rpm and 172 lb-ft at 4,900 rpm. The second engine is a new 3.0L version of GM's existing high-feature V6 family. Like the most recent versions of the 3.6L V6, the 3.0L uses the DI system to increase power and fuel efficiency. New isolated injectors reduce the ticking noise often associated with DI engines.
The first application for both engines will be the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox that will debut at the Detroit Auto Show next month. In the Equinox the 3.0L will be rated at 255 hp and 214 lb-ft of torque. The DI 2.4L will allow the Equinox to hit 30 mpg on the highway. According to GM in 2010 it will have eight different direct injected engines in 38 models around the world including 18 in North America.
[Source: General Motors]
For release: Dec. 18, 2008, 12:01 p.m. ET
GENERAL MOTORS' NEWEST ENGINES HELP SAVE FUEL AND MONEY
New technologies and vehicle enhancements will enable GM's 2009 domestic car and light truck lineups to save 700 million gallons of fuel over vehicle life as compared to the 2008 GM fleet
Chevy Equinox four-cylinder model to offer class-leading highway fuel economy
PONTIAC, Mich. – Owners of the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox crossover will hit the streets next summer in a vehicle equipped with a highly efficient, all-new engine that will help save both fuel and money.
The 2010 Equinox will be offered with a choice of two new direct injected (DI) engines that use less fuel yet make more power – a 2.4L four-cylinder and a 3.0L V-6. The 2.4L engine delivers an estimated 30 mpg in highway driving (EPA certification pending), placing the Equinox at the top of its segment in highway mileage. Consumers who drive the 2.4L-equipped Equinox 15,000 miles per year will save 134 gallons of fuel or about $270 to $400 annually (assuming gas prices of $2 or $3 per gallon as compared to 2009MY Equinox).
The Equinox will join a growing roster of direct injected vehicles from GM, including the all-new 2010 Cadillac SRX crossover and 2010 Buick LaCrosse sedan, which, along with the Equinox, debut in January at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. In fact, for the 2010 model year, GM will offer more DI models in North America than any other manufacturer.
"We first introduced direct injection in North America in the 2007 Saturn Sky Red Line and the Pontiac Solstice GXP," said Tom Stephens, executive vice president, GM Global Powertrain and Global Quality. "We've been rolling out the technology across our portfolio as quickly as we can so that our customers will have additional fuel savings options. Direct injection is a state-of-the art engineering solution because it enables improved fuel economy and lower emissions without sacrificing power."
In the 2009 model year, GM offers six engines in 18 models globally with direct injection. By 2010, GM will have eight direct injected engines in 38 vehicle models, covering 10 percent of its global volume. In North America alone, GM will offer 18 models with direct injection.
GM's fuel-saving lineup
GM's direct injection push is part of a larger effort to implement multiple fuel-saving technologies across its 2009 portfolio. The all-new 2009 Chevy Traverse crossover, for example, enjoys best-in-class highway fuel economy (24 mpg for FWD models) of any eight-passenger SUV, thanks in part to its 3.6L direct injected V-6 engine with variable valve timing. In 2009, GM expects to sell 500,000 vehicles with gasoline direct injection.
Here are additional fuel-saving facts about GM vehicles:
Twenty models in GM's 2009 lineup deliver EPA-rated highway fuel economy of 30 mpg or more – more than any other automaker. GM's non-hybrid models rank first in highway fuel economy in both the midsize sedan and subcompact segments. (Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura with 33 highway mpg; and Chevrolet Colbalt XFE and Pontiac G5 XFE at 37 highway mpg.)
GM's 2009 domestic car and light truck lineups will use 700 million fewer gallons of fuel than the 2008 lineup, during the life of the vehicles, saving $1.4 to $2.1 billion in fuel costs, assuming gas prices of $2 to $3 per gallon. It's estimated that GM's 2010 lineup will add another 1.1 billion gallons of fuel savings and $2.2 to $3.3 billion, relative to the 2008 lineup.
GM's advanced engine technologies are already saving fuel today in vehicles on the road or expected to be sold in 2009. They include:
More than 3.7 million vehicles with variable valve timing (VVT)
700,000 vehicles with direct injection
600,000 vehicles with Active Fuel Management cylinder deactivation technology, which automatically lets the engine run on half of its cylinders when full power is not needed
200,000 vehicles with turbocharged gas engines
42,000 vehicles with both direct injection and turbocharging
More than 2 million vehicles with fuel-saving six-speed transmissions
2.4L DI details
The new 2.4L DI engine delivers an estimated 180 horsepower (134 kW) @ 6700 rpm and 172 lb.-ft. of torque (232 Nm) @4900 rpm. It uses technology based on GM's other four-cylinder direct injection applications, but with unique features designed for its specific application. This includes an 11.4:1 compression ratio that helps build power, slightly dished pistons that increase combustion efficiency and injectors with an application-specific flow rate.
GM benchmarked the best fuel system and noise attenuation products to provide customers with quiet operation.
3.0L DI details
The new 3.0L DI engine is a variant of GM's family of high-feature DOHC V-6 engines that also includes GM's 3.6L DI engine in the Cadillac CTS – an engine named to Ward's AutoWorld's 2009 "Ten Best Engines" list for North America, for the second consecutive year.
The 3.0L is rated at an estimated 255 horsepower (187 kW) and 214 lb.-ft. of torque (290 Nm), for an impressive power-to-displacement ratio of 85 hp per liter. (Output will vary by model.) The 3.0L DI features an isolated fuel injector system that reduces the direct injection high-pressure fuel system pulses for quieter operation. Rubber isolators are used with the fuel rail to eliminate metal-to-metal contact that would otherwise transmit noise and vibration from the high-pressure fuel system.
Along with direct injection technology, both the 3.0L DI and 2.4L DI engines use variable valve timing to optimize power and fuel efficiency across the rpm band, as well as reduce emissions.
How DI works
In a conventionally port fuel injected engine, air and fuel are mixed before they enter the combustion chamber. With GM's DI engines, fuel is sprayed directly into the cylinder where it is mixed with air. As the piston approaches top-dead center, the mixture is ignited by the spark plug; and when the fuel vaporizes in the cylinder, the air and fuel mixture is cooled. This enables the use of a higher compression ratio in the combustion chamber, which improves the engine's power and efficiency.
On cold starts, direct injection can be controlled to create a richer air/fuel mixture around the spark plug, making it easier to ignite in a cold engine. This results in a smoother operation of the engine and lower emissions during the cold start and warm-up, when most harmful tailpipe emissions are typically created. GM's direct injected engines reduce cold-start vehicle emissions by 25 percent.
Because the fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber, direct injection uses higher fuel pressure than conventional fuel injected engines. This is enabled by a special high pressure pump driven by one of the engine's camshafts.
General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM), the world's largest automaker, has been the annual global industry sales leader for 77 years. Founded in 1908, GM today employs about 252,000 people around the world. With global headquarters in Detroit, GM manufactures its cars and trucks in 34 countries. In 2007, nearly 9.37 million GM cars and trucks were sold globally under the following brands: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, GM Daewoo, Holden, HUMMER, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Vauxhall and Wuling. GM's OnStar subsidiary is the industry leader in vehicle safety, security and information services. More information on GM can be found at www.gm.com.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
12-18-2008 @ 12:38AM
Max said...
30mpg freeway, wow what an achievement!
My 1999 Chrysler 300M (almost 10 years old) got 27mpg freeway with a 3.5L v6....and this 4 cylinder is getting 3mpg more, lol
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 12:51AM
UH2L said...
That's the EPA rating. I'm betting it can get closer to 33 mpg in the real world. I've always beaten the EPA ratings in my cars too.
11.4:1 compression ratio and a 6,700 rpm red line is impressive.
12-18-2008 @ 9:07AM
Phil L. said...
Max -
Your '99 300M came with an EPA sticker that said 18/27 city/hwy. The "New" EPA rating would rate that car at 16/24 (both figures from http://www.fueleconomy.gov). Of course, the new Ecotec engine gets graded with the tougher new EPA standards.
If you're getting 30 mpg out of a car with a new EPA highway rating of 24, just imaging what your driving style could get out of one rated at 30.
12-18-2008 @ 12:52AM
sydbot said...
That's on the old EPA ratings, the new ones rank your car at 24 MPG highway mileage. Plus the Equinox is a taller, heavier SUV.
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 1:48AM
John Cripen said...
I'm really impressed by the build quality of the newer Ecotec 4 bangers. The love boost and hold up well. JC, www.projectecotec.net
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 6:23AM
Jimbo said...
Why is it that Audi gets almost the same hp/torque plus better MPG from their 2.0T than GM does from their 3.0? I know it's a turbo and GM's isn't but come on. If it's all about the $$$s then I'd love to see how volume could drive down the cost of the 2.0T. GM is light years better than it was 10yrs ago, but are still several year behind the best.
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 8:23AM
RSR said...
Fairer comparison would be GDI Turbo vs. GDI Turbo.
Audi 2.0 GDI Turbo = 200 hp, 207 lb*ft torque
A3 6-speed manual, 3263 lb curb weight, MPG = 21 city / 30 hwy
Golf GTI 6-speed manual, 3162 lb curb weight, MPG = 21 city / 31 hwy
GM 2.0 GDI Turbo = 260 hp, 260 lb*ft torque
Chevy Cobalt 5-speed manual, 2975lb curb weight, MPG = 22 city / 30 hwy
Cobalt is lighter but also has 1 less gear and tons more power, yet similar fuel economy. (Granted, I think A3 and Golf are more attractive, but we're talking about the engine technology here).
If you really want to compare the Audi 2.0 turbo to GM non-turbo 3.0 and say GM is behind, you can compare GM 2.0 turbo to Audi's VR6 non-turbo as well. Or how about Audi R8 vs. Chevy ZR1? ZR1 has more power but better fuel economy (12/19 mpg vs. 14/20 mpg). So how does your argument of GM being several years behind stand?
My point is not about if GM engines are better than Audi's, but I think choosing ONE example and making a loud conclusion isn't a good argument.
12-18-2008 @ 8:45AM
Jimbo said...
I stand corrected. You made good points and I was frustrated to see these types of "announcements", when they/GM has better products. I guess it's just the cost of the engines that chooses which vehicle they are actually put into. I want to see GM succeed, but sometimes their announcements are underwhelming. It was a bad comparison, but I just want to see some of their better engines used more often. thanks for the examples.
12-18-2008 @ 9:04AM
RSR said...
I appreciate your gentlemanly response.
I also want to see more and more of the advanced engines from all OEMs used, but I suppose they have to consider many things such as capacity and engineering cost, not to mention the limited resource.
And GDI engines cost quite more than conventional gasoline engines due to its expensive injectors and high pressure fuel pump. Direct injectors must survive the extreme environment of the cylinders, since they are directly exposed to the combustion. Adding a turbo is really a major cost too; air plumbing, intercooler, turbocharger, and additional sensor required for the system, and so on. Perhaps that explains why there are still so few of them out there, and practically non-existent for low end economy cars.
12-18-2008 @ 10:00AM
sydbot said...
And Audi gets 255 HP out of their 3.2L V6. Which is also DI.
12-18-2008 @ 7:25AM
Daniel said...
Why is it that 2.0 liter I4's are usually the performance turbocharged engines instead of larger displacement I4's? For example in the Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky, the normally aspirated engine is a 2.4l and the performance model is a turbo 2.0l unit. I've noticed this is true in many other carmakers lineup where they have 2.4 or 2.5l NA units but the performance model is most frequently a 2.0l. Is there something magical about 2.0 liters?
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 8:07AM
Rich said...
Jimbo, If you're going to compare motors, try an apples to apples comparison.
The EPA and Audi websites put the 2009 Audi 2.0L turbo engine at 200 hp (thats not all that close to 255 hp, by the way) and, depending on the vehicle and trans/drive wheels, between 21-23 city and 28-31 highway using premium grade unleaded.
EPA and the Chevy websites put the 2.0L DI Turbo engine in the Cobalt and HHR at 260 hp and 22 city and 30 highway using regular grade unleaded.
While the domestic auto industry is much to blame for their current financial woes, this continued bashing without regard to facts is simply unfair and ignorant.
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 9:12AM
MikeW said...
187kilowatts is only 251hp.
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 9:27AM
michael pettibone said...
Been waiting for D.I. for years,since Mitsu pioneered it.This 180 H.P. four must be much cheaper,simpler and more reliable than the 1.4 turbo they are planning-like to see those two engines compared.Half of that 3 liter v-6 would make a good basic eco engine no?
Reply
12-20-2008 @ 11:05AM
GSP said...
"Been waiting for D.I. for years,since Mitsu pioneered it."
Mitsu? Check out the 1955 Mercedes 300SL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_300SL#First_with_fuel_injection
This car had direct injection into the combustion chamber, just like the aircraft engines that preceded it.
GSP
12-18-2008 @ 10:13AM
joe g. said...
30mpg highway, in a 255hp SUV? Frankly, this is amazing (relative to current offerings).
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 11:37PM
MikeW said...
30mpg is for the 180hp 2.4, not V6.
and more than likely just front wheel drive.
12-18-2008 @ 11:22AM
keveng said...
Daniel,
Engine block strength is the reason you see smaller displacement from the turbo equiped DI engines. If you ran the 2.4 with the turbo at the same pressure as the 2.0 you would run the risk of structural problems with the piston sidewalls (you would crack the block). Warranty would be through the roof. Engines today are poured and cut to eliminate every gram of excess weight.
The nice thing about these engines is that they have more than enough power for what they are intended to do. Without the added $1200-1500 for all the turbo bits and pieces.
Reply
12-18-2008 @ 3:59PM
Daniel said...
Thanks! Great explanation.
12-18-2008 @ 11:27AM
Throwback said...
i own a 2.0 DI turbo HHR SS. This is one of the better engines on the market. It is powerful, smooth and very efficient. can run it on 89 octane although 91 is recommended. With 91 octane I have noticed slightly better MPG approximately 1-2 mpg. I average about 29 mpg combined in daily driving. a recent 500 mile round trip of mostly highway with the cruise set on 60-65 mph I returned 34 mpg.
Reply