The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)

Permanent Workforce: 1,003 Temporary Workforce: 42 Total Workforce: 1,045

Workforce Composition

Employee Pool Total # Men Women Hispanics Whites Blacks Asian Americans / Pacific Islanders American Indians / Alaskan Natives
Permanent Workforce 1,003 55.69% 44.31% 8.61% 39.62% 19.23% 3.45% 0.39%
Major Occupation:                
Misc. Administration & Program 204 71.08% 28.92% 3.92% 75.98% 17.65% 0.49% 1.96%
GS-14 and GS-15* 246 75.2% 24.8% 2.85% 83.33% 8.54% 4.88% 0.41%
Senior Pay Level* 12 83.33% 16.67% 0% 91.67% 0% 0% 8.33%
First-Level Officials/Managers 20 55% 45% 25% 65% 10% 0% 0%
Mid-Level Officials/Managers 105 70.48% 29.52% 8.57% 77.14% 11.43% 1.9% 0.95%
Senior Level Officials/Managers 105 80.95% 19.05% 2.86% 83.81% 5.71% 7.62% 0%

*Does not include pay-banded employees

Targeted Disabilities

Employees with targeted disabilities represented 0.99% of the total government workforce in FY 2004, and of agencies with a permanent workforce of 500 or more, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, at 2.23%, had the highest percentage of employees with targeted disabilities. At DTRA, employees with targeted disabilities represented 0.84% of the total workforce.

EEO Complaint Processing

  1. Counseling

    There were 13 instances of pre-complaint counseling (performed by EEO counselors and/or ADR intake officers). DTRA timely processed 76.9% of the total number of counselings. Following counseling, 7 formal complaints of discrimination were filed.

  2. Alternative Dispute Resolution

    Of DTRA's 13 instances of counseling, ADR was offered 100% of the time; the parties elected to participate in 7.7% of the completed counselings; and 100% of the ADR closures were resolved through settlements or withdrawals.

    At the formal complaint phase, DTRA offered ADR 63.6% of the time, but the parties elected not to participate, resulting in no resolutions achieved through settlements or withdrawals.

  3. Processing Times

    DTRA completed 25% of its investigations within the regulatory time frames, with an average processing time of 263 days for all investigations. In most instances, the

    regulations require completion of investigations within 180 days. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority was the only agency to complete 100% of their investigations within the regulatory time frames, with an average processing time of 117 days.

    DTRA's average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 54 days in FY 2003 to 219 days in FY 2004. The government-wide average was 469 days.

  4. Pending Inventory

    DTRA had a total of 6 complaints pending at the end of FY 2004, with 3 pending investigation for an average of 133 days; and 2 pending the issuance of final decisions for an average of 304 days.

  5. Costs

    DTRA reported no monetary awards for the one counseling settlement with benefits achieved.

    DTRA agreed to pay a total of $3,000 for 2 complaint closures through settlement agreement, final agency decision, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions. For complaint closures with benefits, the average award (including back/front pay, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and lump sum payments) was $1,500.

    DTRA expended a total of $1,000 for 4 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $250.

Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2004

Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Total Instances of Counseling: 12   1   13  
Settlements 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 7.69%
Withdrawal/no Complaint Filed 5 41.6% 0 0% 5 38.46%
Complaints Filed*         6 46.15%
Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year         1 7.69%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2004 where counseling was also completed during FY 2004.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution

Counselings / Complaints ADR Offers ADR Participation
# # % # %
FY 2003 Pre-Complaint Counselings 7 7 100.00% 3 43.00%
FY 2004 Pre-Complaint Counselings 13 13 100.00% 1 7.69%
Percentage Change FY 2003 to FY 2004 85.71% 85.71%   -66.66%  
FY 2003 Complaints* 6 4 67.00% 0 0.00%
FY 2004 Complaints* 11 7 63.64% 0 0.00%
Percentage Change FY 2003 to FY 2004 83.33% 75.00%   0%  

*Includes all complaints filed in the fiscal year, including those where the counseling was completed in the prior fiscal year.

Timeliness

Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2003 APD* FY 2004 APD % Change
All Counselings (minus remands) 13 10 76.92%      
All Investigations 4 1 25.00% 175 263 50.28%
Merit Decisions (no AJ) 1 0 0.00% 0 91 0%
Dismissal Decisions 0     47 0 -100.00%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints Closed in FY 2004

Complaint Outcomes Complaint Closures Final Agency Decision (no AJ decision) Final Order (AJ Decision Fully Implemented) Final Order (AJ Decision Not Fully Implemented)
Total Closures (5) # % # % # % # %
Settlements 2 40.00%            
Withdrawals 1 20.00%            
Dismissals 0 0.00%            
Merit Decisions 2 40.00%            
Finding Discrimination 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Finding No Discrimination 0 0.00% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0%


This page was last modified on May 3, 2005.

Return to Home Page