Return to Home Page| Permanent Workforce: 765 | Temporary Workforce: 7 | Total Workforce: 772 |
| Employee Pool | Total # | Men | Women | Hispanics | Whites | Blacks | Asian Americans / Pacific Islanders | American Indians / Alaskan Natives |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent Workforce | 765 | 41.45% | 58.55% | 6.47% | 73.44% | 14.9% | 4.79% | 0.39% |
| Major Occupations | ||||||||
| Human Resources Management | 330 | 34.85% | 65.15% | 8.79% | 66.97% | 21.52% | 2.12% | 0.61% |
| Information Tech. Management | 203 | 52.22% | 47.78% | 6.9% | 75.86% | 5.91% | 10.84% | 0.49% |
| GS-14 and GS-15* | 180 | 45.56% | 54.44% | 3.89% | 87.22% | 6.67% | 2.22% | 0% |
| Senior Pay Level* | 13 | 53.85% | 46.15% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| First-Level Officials/Managers | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mid-Level Officials/Managers | 71 | 47.89% | 52.11% | 2.82% | 83.1% | 11.27% | 2.82% | 0% |
| Senior Level Officials/Managers | 65 | 57.58% | 42.42% | 0% | 92.42% | 4.55% | 1.52% | 0% |
*Does not include pay-banded employees
Employees with targeted disabilities represented 0.99% of the total government workforce in FY 2004, and of agencies with a permanent workforce of 500 or more, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, at 2.23%, had the highest percentage of employees with targeted disabilities. At DHRA, employees with targeted disabilities represented 0.78% of the total workforce.
There were 5 instances of pre-complaint counseling (performed by EEO counselors and/or ADR intake officers). DHRA timely processed 100% of the total number of counselings. Following counseling, 4 formal complaints of discrimination were filed.
Of DHRA's 5 instances of counseling, ADR was offered 100% of the time; the parties elected to participate in 40% of the completed counselings; and 100% of the ADR closures were resolved through settlements or withdrawals.
At the formal complaint phase, DHRA made no ADR offers.
DHRA completed its one investigation in 119 days, within the regulatory time. In most instances, the regulations require completion of investigations within 180 days. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority was the
only agency to complete 100% of their investigations within the regulatory time frames, with an average processing time of 117 days.
DHRA's average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 401 days in FY 2003 to 566 days in FY 2004. The government-wide average was 469 days.
DHRA had a total of 3 complaints pending at the end of FY 2004, with 2 pending investigation for an average of 59 days; and 1 pending the issuance of final decisions for an average of 164 days.
DHRA provided no monetary awards for the 2 counseling settlements with benefits that were achieved.
DHRA reported no complaint closures during this reporting period.
DHRA expended a total of $1,700 for 1 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $1,700.
| Counseling Outcomes | Completed by EEO Counselor | Completed Using ADR | All Completed Counselings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | |
| Total Instances of Counseling: | 5 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Settlements | 2 | 40.00% | 2 | 100.00% | 2 | 40.00% |
| Withdrawal/no Complaint Filed | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Complaints Filed* | 2 | 40.00% | ||||
| Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year | 1 | 20.00% | ||||
*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2004 where counseling was also completed during FY 2004.
| Counselings / Complaints | ADR Offers | ADR Participation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | # | % | # | % | |
| FY 2003 Pre-Complaint Counselings | 2 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| FY 2004 Pre-Complaint Counselings | 5 | 6 | 100.00% | 2 | 40.00% |
| Percentage Change FY 2003 to FY 2004 | 150.00% | 0% | 0% | ||
| FY 2003 Complaints* | 6 | 2 | 33.00% | 2 | 33.00% |
| FY 2004 Complaints* | 6 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Percentage Change FY 2003 to FY 2004 | 0.00% | -100.00% | -100.00% | ||
*Includes all complaints filed in the fiscal year, including those where the counseling was completed in the prior fiscal year.
| Total # | # Timely | % Timely | FY 2003 APD* | FY 2004 APD | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Counselings (minus remands) | 5 | 5 | 100.00% | |||
| All Investigations | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | 158 | 119 | -24.68% |
| Merit Decisions (no AJ) | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Dismissal Decisions | 1 | 0 | 205 | 0% |
*APD = Average Processing Days
| Complaint Outcomes | Complaint Closures | Final Agency Decision (no AJ decision) | Final Order (AJ Decision Fully Implemented) | Final Order (AJ Decision Not Fully Implemented) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Closures (3) | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % |
| Settlements | 0 | 0.00% | ||||||
| Withdrawals | 0 | 0.00% | ||||||
| Dismissals | 1 | 33.33% | ||||||
| Merit Decisions | 2 | 66.66% | ||||||
| Finding Discrimination | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Finding No Discrimination | 2 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
This page was last modified on May 3, 2005.