BY RECIPIENT   Search by name: Top 100 Recipients (2009) Top 100 Recipients (2008) Top 100 Recipients (2007) Top 100 Recipients (2006) Top 100 Recipients (2005) Top 100 Recipients (2004) Top 100 Recipients (2003) Top 100 Recipients (2002) Top 100 Recipients (2001) Top 100 Recipients (2000)  Overview: type of recipient  Overview: cong. district of recipient  Advanced search for recipients BY PLACE OF PERFORMANCE   Overview by state Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming American Samoa Micronesia Guam Marshall Islands N. Mariana Islands Palau Puerto Rico Virgin Islands  Advanced search by place of performance. BY AGENCY   Overview by major agency Department of Agriculture Department of Commerce Department of Defense Department of Education Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Housing and Urban Dev. Department of Justice Department of Labor Department of State Department of the Interior Department of the Treasury Department of Transportation Department of Veterans Affairs Environmental Protection Agency NASA Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Science Foundation Office of Personnel Management Small Business Administration Social Security Administration U.S. Agency for International Development All other agencies  Advanced search by agency OTHER   Overview by type of assistance Type of recipient and assistance, 2009 Type of recipient and assistance, 2008 Type of recipient and assistance, 2007 Type of recipient and assistance, 2006 Type of recipient and assistance, 2005 Type of recipient and assistance, 2004 Type of recipient and assistance, 2003 Type of recipient and assistance, 2002 Type of recipient and assistance, 2001 Type of recipient and assistance, 2000  Grants by program Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time. Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS. For more details, please click here

PRINTER-FRIENDLY

Assistance to Recipients in Georgia 6 (Johnny Isakson / Tom Price)
(FY 2005)

Summary

Fiscal Year: 2005 Federal dollars: $50,960 This Congressional District is ranked 293 among districts for this year. Total number of recipients: 1 Total number of transactions: 1 Get list of recipients Get list of transactions Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Recipients are Located Georgia 6 (Johnny Isakson / Tom Price) $50,960 Top 10 Recipients City of Kennesaw $50,960 Recipient Type Other $50,960 Nonprofits $0 Individuals $0 Higher Education $0 Government $0 For Profits $0

Top 5 Programs 15.916: Outdoor Recreation_Acquisition, Development and Planning $50,960 Top 5 Agencies Providing Assistance DOI - National Park Service $50,960 Assistance Type Other $50,960 Loans (both direct and guaranteed) $0 Insurance $0 Grants and Cooperative Agreements $0 Direct Payments (both specified and unrestricted) $0   Trend 2000 $0 2001 $0 2002 $123,230 2003 $0 2004 $0 2005 $50,960 2006 $376,445 2007 $100,084,327 2008 $116,477,191 2009 1Q * $10,814,538

*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 17, 2009.

The assistance database is compiled from agency-provided data. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.