WPC` 2 BJ ZCourier#|xx6X@KX@Apple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRSx  @hhhhPijX@#|x2,<ZzXCourierCourier Bold 10cpi Bold (H)Courier 10cpi Italic (H)HP LaserJetHPLASERJ.PRSx  @PX06{X@T?xxxx6X@KX@?xxxx `KX@8QX@HP LaserJetHPLASERJ.PRSx  @PX06{X@2>2 Z2^     X   ?  ORDER LIST MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1993 APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 92-837 LOPEZ, RAFEL V. HALE CTY., TX, ET AL. The judgment is affirmed.  ?  CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 91-1141 PRICE, ROBYN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for  ?  further consideration in light of Republic National Bank  ?  of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S.   (1992). 91-1720 CASTRO-VASQUEZ, JESUS, ET AL V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  ?x  further consideration in light of Republic National Bank  ?  of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S.   (1992). 91-1884 TANGONAN, CESAR, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  ?'  further consideration in light of Republic National Bank'0*((Ԍ ? ԙ of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S.   (1992). 92-511 STEVEDORING SERVICES, ETC. V. ANCORA TRANSPORT, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  ?  further consideration in light of Republic National Bank  ?`  of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S.   (1992). 92-6031 MORRILL, ALFRED O. V. UNITED STATES  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed November 25, 1992. 92-6239 PRICE, RICKY LEE V. NORTH CAROLINA  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for  ?@  further consideration in light of Morgan v. Illinois, 501 U. S.   (1992). '0*((Ԍ  ?  ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No.  . JOHN JONES, SR. V. GAYDULA AND KUTALEK The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari outoftime is denied. No.  . ELIUS REED V. AMAX COAL COMPANY The motion for reconsideration of the order denying motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari outoftime is denied. No.  . PROGRESS ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING ENTERPRISE, INC. V. BEN MASSONGILL The motion for reconsideration of the order denying nonattorney leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari on behalf of a corporation and  ?  leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. A413. JAMES E. LEWIS V. UNITED STATES The application for release on bond addressed to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied. A445. JACK B. SOLERWITZ V. E.W. JONES The application for bail addressed to Justice Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied. D-940 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT ALLEN MOORE It having been reported to the Court that Robert Allen Moore, of Brownsville, Texas, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this Court by order of October 15, 1990, having suspended the said Robert Allen Moore from the practice'0*((Ԍ of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Robert Allen Moore be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1166 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID L. BRODSKY It having been reported to the Court that David L. Brodsky, of Clive, Iowa, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Iowa and this Court by order of October 13, 1992, having suspended the said David L. Brodsky from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said David L. Brodsky be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. '0*((Ԍ D-1168 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARL M. MITCHELL It having been reported to the Court that Carl M. Mitchell, of Hauppauge, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department and this Court by order of October 13, 1992, having suspended the said Carl M. Mitchell from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Carl M. Mitchell be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1176 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RANDY WAYNE KEITH It having been reported to the Court that Randy Wayne Keith, of Chatsworth, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Randy Wayne Keith from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; '0*((Ԍ And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Randy Wayne Keith be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1178 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MORRIS EISEN It having been reported to the Court that Morris Eisen, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Morris Eisen from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Morris Eisen be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1179 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD MICHAEL FISHMAN It having been reported to the Court that Harold Michael Fishman, of Great Neck, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial '0*((Ԍ Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Harold Michael Fishman from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Harold Michael Fishman be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1180 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAY HOWARD LANDAU It having been reported to the Court that Jay Howard Landau, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Jay Howard Landau from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Jay Howard Landau be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and '0*((Ԍ that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1181 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STUART CHARLES LEVITAS It having been reported to the Court that Stuart Charles Levitas, of Walnut Creek, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Stuart Charles Levitas from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Stuart Charles Levitas be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1184 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAWSON A. McQUAIG, SR. It having been reported to the Court that Dawson A. McQuaig, Sr., of Jacksonville, Florida, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Dawson A. McQuaig, Sr. from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a '0*((Ԍ rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Dawson A. McQuaig, Sr. be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1185 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THEODORE CARLTON RICHARDSON It having been reported to the Court that Theodore Carlton Richardson, of Washington, D.C., has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Theodore Carlton Richardson from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Theodore Carlton Richardson be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. ' 0*((Ԍ D-1186 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL McGRADY It having been reported to the Court that Michael McGrady, of Seattle, Washington, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Oregon and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Michael McGrady from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Michael McGrady be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1204 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRANKLIN R. SEARS It having been reported to the Court that Franklin R. Sears, of Fort Worth, Texas, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this Court by order of November 9, 1992, having suspended the said Franklin R. Sears from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has ' 0*((Ԍ been filed; It is ordered that the said Franklin R. Sears be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1210 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BARBARA L. WOLF It having been reported to the Court that Barbara L. Wolf, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of November 30, 1992, having suspended the said Barbara L. Wolf from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Barbara L. Wolf be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1219 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD WILLIAM BABIC It is ordered that Edward William Babic, of Newport Beach, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should ' 0*((Ԍ not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1220 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN C. SUGARMAN It is ordered that Alan C. Sugarman, of Boca Raton, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1221 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID BRICE TOY It is ordered that David Brice Toy, of Los Angeles, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1222 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NANCY ANN BAKER It is ordered that Nancy Ann Baker, of Auburn, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1223 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALEXANDER THEOHAROUS It is ordered that Alexander Theoharous, of West Balm Beach, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. ' 0*((Ԍ D-1224 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL S. LINN It is ordered that Michael S. Linn, of Hartsdale, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 91-1600 HAZEN PAPER CO., ET AL. V. BIGGINS, WALTER The motion of respondent to strike supplemental brief is denied. 91-7604 ANTOINE, JEFFERY V. BYERS & ANDERSON, INC. The motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. for leave to file a brief as  ?  amici curiae is granted. 91-7849 BUCKLEY, STEPHEN V. FITZSIMMONS, MICHAEL, ET AL. 92-259 OK TAX COMMN. V. SAC & FOX NATION The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to  ?  participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted. 92-207 UNITED STATES V. PADILLA, XAVIER, ET AL. The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. 92-351 HELLER, LEONARD, ETC. V. DOE, SAMUEL, ETC., ET AL. The motion of Voice of the Retarded, et al. for  ?#  leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument is denied. ' 0*((Ԍ 92-357 SHAW, RUTH O., ET AL. V. BARR, ATTY GENERAL, ET AL. The motion of appellants to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. 92-621 RAKE, DONALD, ET AL. V. WADE, WILLIAM J. The motion of Consumer Education and Protective  ?  Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici  ?`  curiae is granted. 92-725 GODINEZ, WARDEN V. MORAN, RICHARD A. The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Cal J. Potter, III, Esquire, of Las Vegas, Nevada, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case. 92-6082 SINDRAM, MICHAEL J. V. VIRGINIA The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of  ?  order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. 92-6171 JONES, SYLVESTER V. JACKSON, JUDGE, USDC, ET AL.  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?   forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until February 1, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari. '0*((Ԍ 92-6443 IN RE JOHN T. FOWLER  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?   forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 1, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. 92-6493 DEMOS, JOHN ROBERT V. SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until February 1, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.  ?p  CERTIORARI DENIED 91-8010 RHOADES, PAUL E. V. IDAHO 91-8331 MONTALVO, MICHAEL V. STAMM, JEFFREY, ET AL. 91-8346 SAMMONS, MICHAEL L. V. PHILLIPS, LEROY, ET AL. 92-372 TATARANOWICZ, MARY, ET AL. V. SULLIVAN, SEC., H&HS 92-417 AXMEAR, FREDERICK V. UNITED STATES 92-427 DANNIS, CHARLES, ET AL. V. RESOLUTION TRUST, ET AL. 92-428 GRAFF, STANLEY V. V. BANK ONE, TEXAS, ET AL. 92-449 YU, JUNG YUL V. UNITED STATES 92-456 ) BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON V. UNITED STATES ) 92-457 ) SEA AIRMOTIVE, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES'0*((Ԍ 92-467 GILLESPIE, JOHN V. V. MANNES, DIANE H. 92-516 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS, ETC. V. DAKOTA GASIFICATION, ET AL. 92-526 ONE PARCEL 456 CAFFERTY RD. V. UNITED STATES 92-544 PETRUS, EDWARD, ET AL. V. INSPECTOR GENERAL, H&HS 92-545 UNITED STATES V. GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO. 92-552 BAKER, JOE V. GULF & WESTERN INDUS., ET AL 92-563 HELTON, CLIFFORD, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-569 NATL. KIDNEY PATIENTS, ET AL V. SULLIVAN, SEC., HHS, ET AL. 92-571 ) PaineWEBBER INCORPORATED V. BankATLANTIC ) 92-765 ) BankATLANTIC V. PaineWEBBER INC. 92-574 TOBIAS, RICHARD V. UNIV. OF TEXAS, ET AL. 92-585 YEAGER, WILLIAM N., ET AL. V. CAMP, BILLY J. 92-590 MEYERLAND CO., ET AL. V. FDIC, ETC. 92-595 REID, JOE W. V. UNITED STATES 92-607 GOODNER, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-633 ROBINSON, KEVIN V. VIRGINIA 92-634 ALABAMA V. GINGO, McRAY, ET AL. 92-639 AGUIRRE, BEATRICE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 92-642 ADKINS, MELVILLE, ET AL. V. SAFEWAY, INC., ET AL. 92-646 PULIDO, LUIS V. UNITED STATES 92-652 PAPENDICK, DAVID V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS 92-658 LATHAM, G. FRANKLIN V. UNITED STATES 92-659 EASLEY, STEVEN V. SOUTHERN SHIPBLDG. CORP. 92-662 CEDAR COAL COMPANY V. SHUFF, JEWELL, ETC., ET AL. 92-665 DAVIS, DAN O. V. UNITED STATES 92-689 McMILLAN, JACQUELINE V. HUNT, ISAAC, ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 92-697 WANGURI, MARTIN V. PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY 92-705 DAVIS, EVELYN V. TOWNSEND, ROBBIE, ET AL. 92-715 ULLOA, RICHARD, ET AL. V. WESTERN SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL 92-740 C.F. BEAN CORPORATION V. MID-VALLEY, INC. 92-742 CURTIS, ARTHUR S. V. WOLF-LENKIN LTD. 92-747 McCOLLOUGH, WM., ET UX. V. A. G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC. 92-748 AL DRY DOCK & SHIPBUILDING V. HOLCOMBE, WILLIE 92-749 CAMPOS, JESSE, ET AL. V. HOUSTON, ET AL. 92-754 ANGEL, THOMAS, ET UX. V. FROEHLICH, JUDGE, SUPER. CT. 92-756 RUTLAND, ET AL. V. INDUS. BANK OF JAPAN, ET AL. 92-759 JONES, ARTHUR V. ABC, INC. 92-761 LANKFORD, GEORGE V. GEORGIA 92-768 LIVADITIS, ANTHANASIOS, ETC. V. ROSARIO, MARILUZ, ET AL. 92-769 SOMMER, ERVIN V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA, ETC. 92-770 SCHIER, CLARENCE V. GOLDBERG, JERRY, ET AL. 92-771 HASENFUS, EUGENE, ET AL. V. SECORD, RICHARD, ET AL. 92-776 ZIMMER, HENRY V. MINNESOTA 92-778 RUSSELL, GORDON, ET UX. V. BD. OF APPLS., TRURO, ET AL. 92-782 WESTON, JoANNE M. V. RODRIGUEZ, ROBERT, ET AL. 92-783 DALLAS & MAVIS FORWARDING V. GENERAL DRIVERS, ETC. 92-786 STONE, DEBORAH, ET AL. V. PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY., ET AL. 92-788 COOK CTY., IL, ET AL. V. CARSTON, HAROLD, ET AL. 92-790 SCHOCH, PAULINE V. PENNSYLVANIA 92-791 ZAHARIA, RONALD, ET AL. V. AURORA MUNICIPAL CT., ET AL. 92-792 PUCKETT, CARROLL V. ALABAMA STATE BAR 92-794 MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. V. GREENWOOD TRUST COMPANY '0*((Ԍ 92-797 GALLEGOS, RAYMOND, ET UX. V. ESPANOLA 92-802 O'LEARY, JAMES V. SACRAMENTO, ET AL. 92-803 SPEACHT, WILLIAM V. MOBIL CHEM. CO. 92-804 WALLENSTEIN, DIR., KING CTY. V. SCHWENDEMAN, DAVID 92-806 COSSETT, JAMES, ET UX. V. FEDERAL JUDICIARY, ET AL. 92-809 FIELDS, RONA V. CLARK UNIV. 92-810 LEGG, R. DAVID V. UNITED MKT. INTL. 92-811 DEUTCSH, ARTHUR V. BIRMINGHAM POST CO. 92-813 McGOWAN, JOHN V. MS STATE OIL & GAS BOARD 92-814 PEPPER BURNS INSULATION V. ARTCO CONTRACTING, INCORP. 92-818 LEMELSON, JEROME V. MATTEL, INC. 92-820 FERNANDEZ, ALBERTO V. SCULLY, WARDEN 92-821 BAYH, GOV. OF IN, ET AL. V. GOVT. SUPPLIERS, ET AL. 92-822 McFARLAND, MARICELA, ET AL. V. CHENEY, SEC OF DEFENSE 92-823 WOODS, LUCILLE V. DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION 92-826 SNELLING, LONNIE V. WESTHOFF, THOMAS, ET AL. 92-829 MOUNTAIN WATER, CO. V. MT DPT. PUBLIC SVC., ET AL. 92-831 BETHLEHEM STEEL, ET AL. V. GRANT, ROYSWORTH, ET AL. 92-832 GUZOWSKI, FRANK, ET AL. V. HARTMAN, BERNARD, ET AL. 92-834 LEVASSEUR, MARK V. MASSACHUSETTS 92-835 SMITH, RODNEY V. VIRGINIA 92-836 PELUSO, JOHN V. ALLEN, ROBERT, ET AL. 92-839 FREIGHTCOR SERVICES, INC. V. VITRO PACKAGING, INC. 92-842 EMORY, EMERSON V. UNITED STATES 92-845 KENNEALLY, LEO V. LUNGREN, ATTY GEN CA, ET AL. 92-846 MARTIN, MARSHALL, ET AL. V. OH TURNPIKE COMMN. '0*((Ԍ 92-847 HENSS, JOHN V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR 92-852 BISHOP, SYLVESTER V. SOUTHRAIL CORP., ET AL. 92-860 AVILA, GUILLERMO V. UNITED STATES 92-864 ALEXANDER, EMMA V. RICE, SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE 92-870 O'BRIEN, WILLIAM J. V. CONRAIL 92-871 WEICHERT, ROBERT N. V. ROBERTS, ELAINE W. 92-891 DONESKI, BERNARD, ET UX. V. MD COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY 92-892 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY V. SNIDER, SHARON 92-897 REYNOLDS, FREDERICK V. MARYLAND 92-911 PIPEFITTERS PENSION, ET AL. V. WALDO, RUSSELL 92-915 DOFF, JEROME V. UNITED STATES 92-920 ) TANNER, CLAUDE V. UNITED STATES ) 92-6665 ) KOTVAS, JOSEPH H. V. UNITED STATES 92-922 POLK, JAMES, ET UX. V. DIXIE INSURANCE COMPANY 92-946 WILKINS, OSCAR V. BURLINGTON NO. RR COMPANY 92-5209 VILARCHAO, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES 92-5277 CRANE, ALVIN W. V. TEXAS 92-5476 HUDSON, JIMMY D. V. NORTH CAROLINA 92-5554 MOSS, BILLY ROY V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5577 WAGSTAFF-EL, RAYMOND V. UNITED STATES 92-5599 THOMAS, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES 92-5663 TAYLOR, ALFRED V. SNIDER, WILLIAM, ET AL. 92-5715 WEBB, HENRY C. V. ANGSTADT, CHARLES 92-5747 BURROWS, JOE V. ILLINOIS 92-5805 HERNANDEZ, JESUS J. V. WOOTEN, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-5848 GREEN, DOUGLAS D. V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 92-5871 RUIZ, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES 92-5885 DELGADO-PERU, NICHOLAS V. UNITED STATES 92-5887 BETANCOURT, RAIMUDO V. UNITED STATES 92-5894 PONCHO, CLYDE V. UNITED STATES 92-5898 BRANSON, CARL V. CARMOUCHE, ANGELA, ET AL. 92-5910 ANTONELLI, MICHAEL C. V. TRUE, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-5965 REDDICK, LAMONT V. UNITED STATES 92-6010 JOHNSON, ANDREW V. ILLINOIS 92-6025 DECKARD, KENNETH T. V. OHIO 92-6058 RILEY, JAMES W. V. SPENCER, A., ET AL. 92-6077 PROVOST, TERRANCE KENNETH V. UNITED STATES 92-6089 SMITH, CURTIS D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6092 BROWN, DeWAYNE V. UNITED STATES 92-6093 BOBADILLA-LOPEZ, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6105 SANDS, RICKY L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6115 REILLY, MARK A. V. CALIFORNIA 92-6120 LANGE, VIRGINIA. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-6137 LABOY, RAUL V. UNITED STATES 92-6145 ) GRAY, MARCUS V. UNITED STATES ) 92-6170 ) CALDWELL, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES 92-6178 BROWN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6204 JAMERSON, LARRY D. V. USDC ED CALIFORNIA 92-6209 MARTINEZ, BENJAMIN DAVID V. UNITED STATES 92-6220 CHAN, THOMAS V. INS 92-6244 ANDERSON, GLENN F. V. DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 92-6253 GREEN, BUCK V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL '0*((Ԍ 92-6282 EVANS, MARTIN V. OHIO 92-6289 JONES, SYLVESTER V. JUD. BRANCH OF U.S., ET AL. 92-6290 CAPOSEY, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES 92-6305 BARNARD, HAROLD A. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6326 PHILLIPS, GEORGE T. V. BRENNAN, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6332 BARON, KEITH V. UNITED STATES 92-6336 BROWN, LEONIDAS V. UNITED STATES 92-6339 COOK, EDWARD DEAN V. UNITED STATES 92-6346 PRIEST, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 92-6357 UTLEY, JAMES KENNETH V. INDIANA 92-6358 COLEMAN, ISAAC J. V. UNITED STATES 92-6360 BLUE, ROBERT Z. V. ILLINOIS 92-6362 WALLACE, JAMES GRANVIL V. ARIZONA 92-6383 FELAN, ELIZABETH A. V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL 92-6385 SMITH, SCOTT V. BLODGETT, JAMES 92-6387 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. ALFRED HUGHES UNIT, ET AL. 92-6388 WHITEHEAD, DAVID V. GATES, DIR., CIA 92-6389 THORNTON, DOUGLAS V. QUINLAN, DIR. 92-6390 VICK, ELBERT V. MAYNARD, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6397 JONES, QUEEN E. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 92-6398 JACKSON, A. C. V. SANDAHL, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6403 HERRON, BILL V. WOODRUFF, MacARTHUR, ET AL. 92-6405 ESTREMERA, JOEL V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 92-6406 JONES, RICKY L. V. THOMPSON, WARDEN 92-6407 FORD, ISAAC V. CALIFORNIA 92-6411 CARTA, ISABELLE V. TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 92-6412 CALLIS, STANLEY JOSEPH V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC 92-6420 MITAN, JASON V. UNITED STATES 92-6421 PADIOS, ROBERT V. CONTINENTAL GROUP, ET AL. 92-6424 WATSON, KEITH V. TAYLOR, WARDEN 92-6434 ROE, DANIEL E. V. INDIANA 92-6437 MESSAMORE, JAMES FRANKLIN V. FALK, DIR. OF CORR., HAWAII 92-6441 CASAS-ACEVEDO, MARTIN V. UNITED STATES 92-6444 FINOCCHI, JOSEPH G. V. ARIZONA DOC, ET AL. 92-6445 JOHNSON, GARRISON V. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6447 JOHNSTON, HIRAM R. V. CHESNEY, SUPT., ET AL. 92-6458 SANDERS, HENRY V. SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT, ET AL. 92-6460 VALDIVIEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES 92-6462 SAVENELLI, JOSEPH V. MEACHUM, COMMR., CT DOC 92-6465 CHRISTENSEN, RUDOLPH V. ARMONTROUT, BILL, ET AL. 92-6467 REYES, PABLO V. CALIFORNIA 92-6475 MALANEZ, VERNON A. V. LYNN, SEC., LA DEPT., ET AL. 92-6476 BATES, NELSON PATTERSON V. ALABAMA 92-6477 COOPER, WILLIAM V. GROOSE, SUPT.,JEFFERSON CITY 92-6478 AYRES, CARL V. DELO, SUPT.,POTOSI CORR. CTR 92-6481 HARRISON, MICHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6482 DEMPSEY, BOYCE V. WTLK TV 14, ET AL. 92-6483 WOLFE, BURTON V. INTL. BHD. TEAMSTERS 92-6485 AMARIGLIO, JACK V. CENTURA BANK, ET AL. 92-6488 CASTRO, ELIGIO V. NYC BOARD OF EDUCATION,ET AL 92-6489 MORGAN, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES 92-6492 MacGUIRE, WILLIAM A. V. HENRY, WILLIAM O.E., ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 92-6494 CARNEY, JAMES V. DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 92-6495 AMMONS, VINCENT L. V. ALTERGOTT, KATHY 92-6497 TURNER, TERRY MICHAEL V. SUMNER, 92-6502 HENDERSON, LELAND W. V. DUCKWORTH, SUPT. 92-6503 LEWIS, DAVID ALLEN V. COURT OF APPEALS, 12TH DIST. 92-6504 RYAN, CRAIG M. V. SARGENT, WILLIS, WARDEN 92-6505 MARTIN, MORRIS V. JONES, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6507 REECE, JOHNN WAYNE V. LOVE, SUPT., HUNTINGDON, ET 92-6508 WHITE, MICHAEL V. MORRIS, TERRY, ET AL. 92-6513 ALLEN, CALVIN V. MADIGAN, EDWARD, ET AL. 92-6514 JENSEN, HERBERT O. V. RAYL, RICHARD, ET AL. 92-6516 FIGUEROA, RAFAEL O. V. UNITED STATES 92-6519 WINT, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-6523 SCHUTTERLE, LOYEL V. IA COUNTY BOARD, ET AL. 92-6524 CAMARENA, HECTOR V. SUPERIOR COURT OF LONG BEACH 92-6525 THOMPSON, LAWRENCE EDWARD V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6528 SCEIFERS, DONALD R. V. VAIL, KENDALL 92-6531 JONES, DOROTHY M. V. NATL. SUPER MARKETS, ET AL. 92-6533 MacFARLANE, ROBERT GEORGE V. UNITED STATES 92-6537 McCARTHY, JOHN MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6538 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. ILLINOIS 92-6539 MOOREHEAD, BENJAMIN V. FLORIDA 92-6540 PAYNE, JOSEPH PATRICK V. THOMPSON, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6541 MURRAY, ROGER, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE 92-6542 RODRIGUEZ, JERARDO V. BLODGETT, SUPT., WA , ET AL. 92-6543 CHANEY, ALBERT V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ '0*((Ԍ 92-6545 ARNETTE, SAM T. V. DEPT. OF H&HS 92-6547 DEROCK, ROY T. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 92-6548 KETCHUM, DAVID T. V. GRIFFITH, BRAD, ET AL. 92-6549 GLASS, JAMES F. V. DUCKWORTH, SUPT. 92-6550 ANGARITA-GARZON, LUIS H. V. UNITED STATES 92-6552 ORTIZ, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES 92-6555 ALEXANDER, RICKY DEAN V. TX DCJ, ET AL. 92-6556 VU, DALE V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL 92-6557 ESTES, NEWTON C. V. McCOTTER, O. L., ET AL. 92-6560 MENDOZA, ROGACIANO GONZALES V. BLODGETT, SUPT., WA, ET AL. 92-6561 THOMAS, RALPH INTERNATIONAL V. CALIFORNIA 92-6562 CHINN, DAVEL V. V. OHIO 92-6563 CLAIR, KENNETH V. CALIFORNIA 92-6565 EDWARDS, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES 92-6566 JONES, JUANITA M. V. PENNSYLVANIA 92-6567 JONES, BRENDA E., ET AL. V. LASSEN, SVEIN J., ET AL. 92-6568 JONES, ARTHUR L. V. THOMAS, SUPT. 92-6569 USHER, NATHANIEL V. VASQUEZ, WARDEN 92-6571 SAMM, EVANGELINE V. PLAZA WEST 92-6575 ROJAS, MARTIN V. OHIO 92-6576 MASON, MICHAEL, ET UX. V. USDC FOR CD CALIFORNIA 92-6577 MORRIS, JAMES V. FBI, ET AL. 92-6579 GEE, DONALD V. BALL, JAMES W., ET AL. 92-6580 STEVENSON, MARION HOWARD V. ADA COUNTY SHERIFF 92-6581 KROUPA, MARY V. COBB COUNTY, GA, ET AL. 92-6582 ANGELO, JAMES W. V. CITY & CO. OF SAN FRANCISCO '0*((Ԍ 92-6585 BUNKER, HARVEY CLARENCE V. BORG, WARDEN 92-6586 CHURCH, JIMMY LEE V. UNITED STATES 92-6588 HENLEY, BRUCE C. V. UNITED STATES 92-6589 MOLANO-GARZA, ARNOLDO V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMN. 92-6590 WHITEHEAD, TYREES C. V. UNITED STATES 92-6599 GILMAN, RICHARD M. V. ESTELLE, WARDEN 92-6600 GALFORD, KEVIN V. MASSACHUSETTS 92-6601 BROOKS, JESSE JAMES V. BAILEY, JACK 92-6602 SIMS, TERRY MELVIN V. FLORIDA 92-6606 LUEVANOS, AMADOR GARCIA V. UNITED STATES 92-6607 MEGGERS, KEVIN D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6608 LANE, RONNY JOE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6610 ATANASOFF, LUBO V. DOVICIO, GREG, ET AL. 92-6613 VALENZUELA, LORDES V. UNITED STATES 92-6614 BRAGER, EMMITT V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6615 HURWITZ, THEODORE W. V. UNITED STATES 92-6616 LAYNE, PATRICIA AGATHA V. UNITED STATES 92-6618 FRENCH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6621 JONES, JOHNNIE LEE V. UNITED STATES 92-6625 BISHOP, TERRY V. ANGELONE, RON, ET AL. 92-6626 DEEMER, ROBERT V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6627 CHAVEZ, NICOLAS V. UNITED STATES 92-6628 CORNILLOT, HECTOR V. UNITED STATES 92-6631 VALENCIA-MAZARIEGOS, RAUL V. UNITED STATES 92-6632 RUSSELL, ROBERT PETER V. UNITED STATES 92-6633 SOLIS-CANTU, MARIA LUISA V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 92-6634 SULLIVAN, MARY ANN V. UNITED STATES 92-6635 DUNCAN, MICHAEL ALLAN V. UNITED STATES 92-6637 DOE, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6638 DRAWDY, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES 92-6640 URIBE-SANTAMARIA, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 92-6642 QUICHOCHO, RICHARD V. GUAM 92-6643 MORRIS, ROHAN V. UNITED STATES 92-6644 LAWRENCE, DENNIS CHARLES V. UNITED STATES 92-6645 SMITH, THOMAS J. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 92-6646 KETCHUM, ROBERT H. V. BURGESS, IBSEN 92-6649 HANSEN, ERLING K. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 92-6650 GERMANY, FRANKIE L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6651 HALL, MILTON E. V. UNITED STATES 92-6652 JEFFERSON, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES 92-6655 CAMPBELL, ORTON T. V. SALVIONE, VINCENT P. 92-6657 BRIGGS, SUSAN CAROL V. UNITED STATES 92-6658 BEEDE, JAMES DARYL V. UNITED STATES 92-6660 THOMAS, TOMMY L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6661 SOLOMON, RICHARD J. V. UNITED STATES 92-6666 GAVIN, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6667 HOCHSCHILD, THOMAS R. V. UNITED STATES 92-6670 RUIZ, JOSE LUIS V. UNITED STATES 92-6673 PRADO, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES 92-6674 PARRA, JOSE VALENCIA V. UNITED STATES 92-6676 WATKINS, RONALD V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC 92-6678 STEPOLI, JOHN ROBERT V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 92-6683 KAADI, ISSAM K. V. UNITED STATES 92-6684 KNIGHT, THOMAS L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6685 JONES, RONALD L. V. UNITED STATES 92-6686 JOHNSTON, DARRIN D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6689 KRESE, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6690 HULL, ROSCOE V. UNITED STATES 92-6692 BREWER, DAVID F. V. UNITED STATES 92-6693 YOUNG, LOVINA V. UNITED STATES 92-6697 FORTENBERRY, CHARLES E. V. UNITED STATES 92-6700 LARCK, TERRY ARNOLD V. UNITED STATES 92-6701 MOATES, ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES 92-6705 CRANE, MAJOR V. KENTUCKY 92-6706 SCHULTZ, BRIAN V. UNITED STATES 92-6711 BARELA, JERRY ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES 92-6719 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES 92-6722 EGAN, ROBERT D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6724 GROSS, BILLY F. V. LOCKHART, DIR., AR DOC 92-6726 HAWKINS, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6729 WILLEY, FREDERICK V. UNITED STATES 92-6737 COLLINS, VERNON V. UNITED STATES 92-6738 CHARLES, TONEY ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES 92-6742 HEIZER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES 92-6744 HAYS, RICKY A. V. UNITED STATES 92-6746 WIDBY, JOSEPH B. V. UNITED STATES 92-6747 GINES, MARION G. V. UNITED STATES 92-6754 NEWT, CURTIS DALE V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 92-6755 RUDOLPH, LARRY LeROY V. UNITED STATES 92-6756 POGANY, SCOTT V. UNITED STATES 92-6760 NORMAN, GEORGE Q. V. UNITED STATES 92-6777 BIVINS, RONALD V. UNITED STATES 92-6778 CORTES, CLAUDIO JESUS V. UNITED STATES 92-6780 BEHRENS, HAROLD ONEE V. UNITED STATES 92-6787 NESBITT, FRANK A. V. UNITED STATES 92-6792 JONES, SYLVESTER V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMN. 92-6799 HARDING, CURTIS F. V. UNITED STATES 92-6800 FARYMAN, LARRY D. V. UNITED STATES 92-6806 PRAY, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 92-6807 CLIPPER, RONALD V. UNITED STATES 92-6821 CURRIE, DAVID JACKSON V. UNITED STATES 92-6822 BLALOCK, PRESTON EUGENE V. UNITED STATES 92-6823 SPARKS, CRAWFORD THOMAS V. UNITED STATES 92-6825 STIER, ARTHUR HARRIS V. UNITED STATES 92-6827 SAUNDERS, MILES DAVIS V. UNITED STATES 92-6830 FORBES, GLENDON, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-6833 GEORGE, RUSSELL M. V. UNITED STATES 92-6835 HICKMAN, BETTY A. V. UNITED STATES 92-6836 FORD, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES 92-6839 MORENO, GERMAN V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 92-373 ROCHE, TIM V. FLORIDA The motion of petitioner to enlarge the record is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. '0*((Ԍ 92-579 BLODGETT, JAMES, ET AL. V. MENDOZA, ROGACIANO G.  ?  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  ?   forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 92-606 BURLINGTON N. RR CO.L V. BHD. OF MAINTENANCE, ET AL. The motion of Association of American Railroads, et  ?`  al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 92-610 SHERMAN, ROY V. LUDINGTON, WILLIAM, ET AL. 92-6157 FRAZIER, MALCOLM V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. 92-784 OK COALITION, ET AL. V. FELDMAN, NANCY, ET AL. The motion of Oklahoma for leave to intervene is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 92-817 SOLDIER OF FORTUNE, ET AL. V. BRAUN, MICHAEL, ET AL. The motion of National Association for Information  ?  Services for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National Rifle Association of  ?  America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. '0*((Ԍ 92-948 PHELPS, COY V. CARLSON, WARDEN, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 92-5850 MAHARAJ, KRISHNA V. FLORIDA The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari limited to Question 3 presented by the petition. 92-5862 FAULKENBERRY, DARYL J. V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice White and Justice O'Connor would grant certiorari.  ?P  HABEAS CORPUS DENIED 92-6866 IN RE BILLY LLOYD PUNCHARD 92-6908 IN RE BERNARD DICKERSON The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.  ?  MANDAMUS DENIED 92-867 IN RE EARLENE POLYAK 92-6318 IN RE ROBERT PETER RUSSELL The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied. 92-6442 IN RE PARIS VALENTINE The petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.'0*((Ԍ  ?  REHEARINGS DENIED 91-2044 LEE, DENNIS M. V. CALIFORNIA 91-8369 BANKS, ALFRED V. SAN DIEGO CTY., ET AL. 91-8640 WALKER, TRACY L. V. SEC. OF THE TREASURY, IRS 91-8725 BELL, JAMES H. V. BAKER, WARDEN 92-5028 BENNETT, JACK V. GEORGIA 92-5049 THOMPSON, ALVIN F. V. UNITED STATES 92-5099 THOMAS, JUSTIN E. V. TENNEY ENGINEERING, INC. 92-5124 SCHURR, IVAN V. CHASE HOME MORTGAGE 92-5168 JONES, DONALD L. V. DEPT. OF AIR FORCE, ET AL. 92-5216 MERIT, SAM V. UNITED STATES 92-5236 MASON, SEAN W. V. LOS ANGELES CTY. SUPER. CT. 92-5295 FLORES, JUAN H. V. UNITED STATES 92-5487 WABEKE, PAUL V. MAATMAN, HOWARD, ET AL. 92-5517 LOMBARDO, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 92-5519 LEWIS, ROSALINE B. V. UNITED STATES 92-5728 BENNETT, DANIEL M. V. VIRGINIA 92-5765 SPEARMAN, JOSE L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5802 KOLOCOTRONIS, CYRIL A. V. HOLCOMB, SUPT. 92-5817 MASON, MICHAEL W. V. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF CA 92-5933 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5934 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. HUGHES UNIT, TX DCJ, ET AL. 92-5972 SPEARMAN, JOSE L. V. GARNER, WARDEN 92-5978 IN RE DOROTHY LITZENBERG 92-5994 CRAWFORD, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES'0*((Ԍ 92-6019 FARLEY, JAMES E. V. LOVE, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6103 IN RE JOSEPH WASKO 92-6181 TEMPLEMAN, CHUCK V. UNITED STATES The petitions for rehearing are denied. 91-1935 KOSTELLO, NICHOLAS, ET AL. V. WASHINGTON The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed  ?`  further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for rehearing is denied.  ? # ASSIGNMENT ORDER ă An order of the Chief Justice designating and assigning Justice Powell (Retired) to perform judicial duties in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from November 30, 1992 through June 11, 1993, and for such time as may be required to complete unfinished business, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294(a), is ordered entered on the minutes of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 295.  ?  MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: