Preventing
Secondary Conditions Associated with
Spina Bifida or Cerebral Palsy Symposium
February 17-19, 1994, Crystal City, Virginia
Toward
a State of Well-being: Promoting Healthy Behaviors to Prevent Secondary
Conditions
Michael Marge
I WOULD LIKE first to thank Dr. Katherine Seelman, who is Director of the
National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, for her kind and
generous introduction. I would also like to thank Dr. Don Lollar for his
invitation to be your luncheon speaker. I will try to reward your attention with
suggestions that may prove helpful as we look at the issue of preventing
secondary conditions in people with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. I would be
remiss if I did not commend all of you who are attending and the sponsors-the
United Cerebral Palsy Associations, Spina Bifida Association of America, the
National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, and the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention-for this important conference, which addresses a
nationally significant problem.
And, finally, I must pay tribute to my good friends and professional colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Dr. Mike Adams, Dr. Godfrey Oakley, Dr. Steve Thacker, Jack Jackson, and Larry Burt-for their years of service on behalf of improved health care for persons with disabilities. Actually, the whole thrust of the prevention of primary and secondary disabilities grew out of our early discussions back in 1987 and 1988.
Today, I
wish to present to you for your consideration a concept and a recommendation.
OUR LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE FOR ALL AMERICANS
In 1988 I
wrote, "Persons with disabilities are at significant risk for additional or
secondary disabilities. Because of this increased risk, especially for persons
suffering from the 'disuse syndrome,' it is important that a comprehensive
health promotion component is included in the rehabilitation program for
individuals" (Marge, 1988). Many health providers who work with disability
view the patient's condition as a static entity, but disability should be
perceived as a condition undergoing changes at all times, from the moment of its
acquisition. These changes can lead to further health complications (Marge,
1988). A health promotion program should become an integral part of the
rehabilitation process, beginning early in the primary treatment phase and
continuing throughout life (Marge, 1988).
When we speak about improving health care for any segment of the American
population, I believe it becomes important to ask, "Should the improvement
be provided to all members of the population or just a segment?" I begin
with the premise that all Americans are entitled to the highest quality of
health care (Marge, 1981). Health care services should be directed to attain the
greatest degree of physical, mental, and social well-being. My concept of
physical, mental, and social well-being is influenced by the scholarship of
Angus Campbell (1977), distinguished social psychologist at Stanford University.
The definition of well-being includes two major dimensions: First, satisfaction with ten domains of life: health, work, marriage, housing, community, standard of living, social relationships, creative expression, education, and future prospects for growth and development. Satisfaction with each domain results in an overall experience of pleasantness of life. The person with a high degree of physical, mental, and social well-being speaks about a life that is interesting, enjoyable, worthwhile, friendly, full, hopeful, and rewarding, one that brings out the best in the person.
The second
dimension is the absence of perceived stress. The person feels that life is
easy, not hard; free, not tied down; well-paced, not rushed; and relatively free
of worry, especially about money and other issues (Campbell, 1977). A state of
well-being should be the objective throughout the life span for all persons,
especially for those with disabilities. This means attaining and maintaining a
state of well-being during each stage of life until the time of death.
PREVENTION AND ITS SUBCATEGORIES
The important question here is, How does one attain well-being when one has
chronic functional limitations, as do children and adults with spina bifida or
cerebral palsy? In this context, prevention becomes the key.
Prevention is accomplished by activities in three major areas (Marge, 1981, 1986). The first is health promotion. The goals of health promotion are to educate people about the risks related to health abuses and to increase each person's commitment to a healthy lifestyle that can prevent premature death and disability. It concerns those behaviors that affect health status and are under a person's direct control. The Public Health Service has reported that 53% of the variance for attaining and maintaining good health is related to lifestyle, whereas biological inheritance represents only 13% of the variance.
The second major activity is preventive health services. These are provided by the health delivery system and include immunization, family planning, acute and primary health care as needed, and control of contagious diseases.
The third major activity is health protection, which is focused on hazardous environmental factors that cause disability and premature death. Under this category are included control of toxic metals, airborne pollutants, soil pollutants, radiation, dangerous levels of noise, water pollutants, unsafe drugs, harmful consumer products, as well as control of the safety of food and milk. These controls are generally regulated or monitored by local, state, or federal governments and their agencies.
For
prevention to realize maximum results, the three major activities must be
implemented together. A holistic approach, therefore, is recommended, not just a
focus on health promotion or on preventive health services. Each activity is
part of a whole effort (Marge, 1986, 1991, 1993).
THE SECONDARY CONDITIONS OF SPINA BIFIDA AND CEREBRAL PALSY
In an effective health care system, much can be done to prevent secondary conditions. See Table 1 for a list of the most common health complications associated with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. These secondary conditions are found at various stages in the life of a person with spina bifida or cerebral palsy. (I have recently completed an analysis that identifies the time ranges when these conditions may occur; they will be included in a forthcoming publication.) These are the conditions that we are attempting to prevent.
Table
1
Secondary Conditions Associated with Spina Bifida and Cerebral Palsy
Learning disabilities
Depression
Adjustments in social relationships
Mobility limitations
Joint and muscle pain
Progressive contractions
Problems with balance
Nerve entrapments
Bladder incontinence
Bowel incontinence and control
Bowel incontinence and control (constipation)
Allergies (latex)
Gastrointestinal problems
Dental problems
Seizures
Obesity
Compromised respiratory function
Tethered cord problems in adults
Spinal cord compression
Cardiovascular disorders
Pressure sores
Spasticity changes
THE IMPACT OF THE COMPRESSION OF MORBIDITY
If we wish
to attain the greatest degree of physical, mental, and social well-being
throughout life, then we need to look at what happens to Americans in the aging
process. Although during the past three decades life expectancy has increased
16.4 years on the average for people 65 and older, only 12 of these years will
be in healthy living (National Center for Health Statistics, 1990). Statistics
about the prevalence of the main causes of limitations on activity for each age
group of Americans in the mid-1980s reveal that with increasing age, chronic
diseases and limited mobility loom proportionately much larger in the lives of
those older than 45 than in younger cohorts; sensory and intellectual limitation
become proportionately more significant later, after the age of 70 (LaPlante,
1988). As we grow older, we are at greater and greater risk for primary and
secondary disabilities.
Our health objective should be that we continue to increase the life span of all
Americans but at the same time increase the number of years people experience a
healthy life with the greatest degree of functional independence.
Functional independence is defined as a person's continuing ability to perform activities required for daily living with the least amount of assistance (Katz, 1983). More independence, less dependency. About 33 million people of all ages have reduced physical or mental abilities due to chronic conditions that result in severe functional limitations (National Center for Health Statistics, 1989). It is further estimated that of this number, 17% or 5.6 million elderly disabled need assistance with personal care or home management (Institute of Medicine, 1991).
One
objective, therefore, is to compress morbidity as much as possible to just
before the time of natural death (Fries, 1990). What person with spina bifida,
for instance, wishes to face the prospect of acquiring a secondary condition
such as a stroke, to suffer 10 or 20 years before natural death? Let all of us
live as long as it is ordained, but let's live in good health and dignity,
preserving a life of independency, a life free of pain, suffering, and physical
and mental limitations. In 64 B.C. Seneca said, "The purpose of life is not
in living but in living well!"
PREVENTION PROGRAMS FOR PERSONS WITH SPINA BIFIDA OR CEREBRAL PALSY
You may ask, "What can be done when a person has a primary disability such as spina bifida and cerebral palsy?" Let's start by saying that health promotion should begin as early in life as possible (Marge, 1988). First, we should teach each person to become personally responsible for a large portion of his or her health status. Second, we should teach the person to become joint manager of his or her own short-term and long-term rehabilitation program. There is a great deal of evidence to support certain recommended behaviors for attaining and maintaining the greatest degree of well-being.
These behaviors are recommended not only to help prevent primary disabilities but also to reduce the risk for acquiring secondary conditions. Let me enumerate these practices.
DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES
In order to deliver the second major activity of prevention, that is, effective and responsive health care services that may be necessary if we are to prevent secondary conditions in persons with spina bifida and cerebral palsy, there must be a single port of entry for the individual. In other words, there should be a one-stop health care facility in each community to which a person may go in order to receive all the necessary services, or at least some of the services and referrals to other health care facilities. Such care should continue from infancy throughout the natural life span of each person.
Health
care must be continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive throughout life. At the
present time it is difficult to find such holistic community-based programs for
persons with severe disabilities. It seems logical to me that the spina bifida
or cerebral palsy clinics in each community assume this responsibility. Another
suggestion is to expand the role of the independent living centers to include
the provision of continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive health care
throughout a person's life.
MOVING PREVENTION FROM DREAM TO REALITY
If you accept my recommendation that we provide effective prevention services to people with spina bifida or cerebral palsy, then we need to look at ways of transforming the idea to a reality. There are several approaches I would like to recommend to each of you. The first is for the participants of this conference, especially persons with disabilities and their families, to support a resolution that asks President and Mrs. Clinton to include in their health reform plan a provision for continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive services for persons with severe disabilities managed through a single port of entry in each community. Any other plan for health care delivery will be unacceptable. If approaching the White House is considered ill-advised or insufficient, then take the resolution and the proceedings of this conference with its recommendations to U.S. Senator Tom Harkins and to U.S. Congressman Henry Waxman. I predict that they will receive the resolution and recommendations with great interest.
In any
event, don't let these deliberations collect dust because of timidity about
bringing them to the highest level in our government. The time has come to
request-no demand-prevention services that reduce the risk for secondary
conditions and provide the greatest measure of physical, mental, and social
well-being throughout your lifetime. Let's call for A Healthy People 2000 for
Americans with disabilities!
REFERENCES
Campbell, A. (1977). Subjective measures of well-being. In G. W. Albee & J. M. Joffe (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology: Vol. 1. The issues. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.
Fries, J. F. (1990). An introduction to the compression of morbidity. In P. R. Lee & C. L. Estes (Eds.), The nation's health (3rd ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Institute of Medicine. (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Katz, S. (1983). Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 31(12), 721-727.
LaPlante, M. P. (1988). Data on disability from the National Health Interview Survey, 1983-1985. In InfoUse Report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Marge, M. (1981). The prevention of human disabilities: Policies and practices for the 80s. In L. Perlman (Ed.), International aspects of rehabilitation: Policy guidance for the 1980s. Alexandria, Va.: National Rehabilitation Association.
Marge, M. (1986). The prevention of disabilities. In Toward independence: An assessment of federal laws and programs affecting persons with disabilities. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Disability
Marge, M. (1988). Health promotion for persons with disabilities moving beyond rehabilitation. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2(4), 29-35.
Marge, M. (1991). Testimony in support of the Disability Prevention Act of 1991 before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Health and Energy. Congressional Record, Serial No. 102-48, 69-78.
Marge, M.
(1993). Disability prevention: Are we ready for the challenge? Asha, 35, 42-44.
National Center for Health Statistics (1989). Current estimates from the
National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1988. Vital and Health
Statistics. Series 10, No. 173, DHHS Publications (PHS) 89-1501. Hyattsville,
Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
National
Center for Health Statistics. (1990). Health, United States, 1989 and Prevention
Profile. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 90-1232. Hyattsville, Md.: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
Michael Marge, Ed.D., is Director, Center for the Prevention of Disabilities,
Syracuse University, in Syracuse, New York.
COPYRIGHT 1994 by Michael Marge