Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Virginia 3 (Robert C. Scott)
(FY 2008)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2008
Total dollars: $1,800,694,374
The amount for this search is 0.5% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 47 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 758
Total number of transactions: 11,187
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$560,948,074
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$76,933,757
Competition within a limited pool$344,226,660
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$2,273,567
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$123,674,068
Not competed for an allowable reason$672,339,952
Not identified, soon to be addressed$20,298,297

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Virginia 3 (Robert C. Scott)$1,188,612,215
Virginia 2 (Thelma D. Drake)$174,270,276
Virginia 4 (J. Randy Forbes)$75,014,159
North Carolina 3 (Walter B. Jones)$58,313,378
California 53 (Susan A. Davis)$52,921,781

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks$522,160,059
Non-nuclear Ship Repair (East) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships east of the 108th meridian$311,003,401
Marine Charter for Things$131,407,220
Fruits and Vegetables$105,124,985
Non-nuclear Ship Repair (West) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on. non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships west of the 108th meridian$63,327,954

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$1,281,354,793
Defense Commissary Agency$137,144,900
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$129,175,816
Defense Logistics Agency$67,323,839
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$33,206,652

Top 10 Contractors

Northrop Grumman Corporation$625,596,813
Bae Systems PLC$176,268,129
A.P. M›ller - M‘rsk A/S$137,802,940
Military Produce Group, LLC$105,044,040
Earl Industries, L.L.C.$55,632,168
Bay Electric Co., Inc.$44,574,394
Virtexco Corporation$41,303,439
Metro Machine Corp.$34,737,286
Chenega Advanced Solutions & Engineering, LLC$32,666,719
Dominion Resources, Inc.$30,053,249

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$929,356,755
2005$914,767,518
2006$1,436,920,776
2007$1,865,270,287
2008$1,800,694,374
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$168,123
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.