Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts 9 (Stephen F. Lynch)
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $1,601,010,166
The amount for this search is 0.4% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 51 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 428
Total number of transactions: 15,638
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$1,352,343,221
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$65,295,201
Competition within a limited pool$109,572,862
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$50,393
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$7,127,711
Not competed for an allowable reason$45,941,625
Not identified, soon to be addressed$20,679,153

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Massachusetts 10 (William D. Delahunt)$27,328,414
Massachusetts 9 (Stephen F. Lynch)$21,790,859
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$19,756,039
California 14 (Anna G. Eshoo)$16,276,863
Puerto Rico nonvoting (Anibal Acevedo-Vila / Luis G. Fortuno)$6,349,065

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Automatic Data Processing Equipment (Including Firmware), Software, Supplies and Support Equipment$537,527,223
Marine Charter for Things$270,580,130
Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$168,100,517
Digitizing Services. Includes cartographic and geographic information.$131,949,507
Telephone and Telegraph Equipment$61,074,398

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$704,465,428
NAVY, Department of the$446,742,588
Washington Headquarters Services$132,908,041
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$85,779,213
U.S. Agency for International Development$65,831,694

Top 10 Contractors

General Dynamics Corporation$1,302,472,349
John Snow, Incorporated$68,740,028
Ultra Electronics Holdings PLC$19,620,468
Planners Collaborative, Inc.$18,755,707
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.$15,891,259
Clean Harbors, Inc$11,689,865
Siemens AG$8,658,928
Parametric Technology Corporation$8,442,017
Metro Reliable Resources, Corp$7,495,708
World Education, Inc.$6,575,256

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$1,081,600,918
2005$1,601,010,166
2006$1,756,356,594
2007$1,131,229,288
2008$509,328,400
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$254,417
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.