Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Colorado 5 (Joel Hefley)
(FY 2006)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2006
Total dollars: $2,287,995,582
The amount for this search is 0.5% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 35 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 649
Total number of transactions: 11,318
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$1,291,427,409
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$114,222,505
Competition within a limited pool$602,412,679
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$30,723,031
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$178,728,030
Not competed for an allowable reason$54,579,052
Not identified, soon to be addressed$15,902,876

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Colorado 5 (Joel Hefley)$252,695,740
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$54,604,673
North Carolina 2 (Bob Etheridge)$33,443,837
Puerto Rico nonvoting (Luis G. Fortuno)$18,348,762
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$16,193,684

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$275,796,639
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ground Effect Vehicles, Motor Vehicles, Trailers, and Cycles$253,687,699
Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$184,590,491
Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Management and Support (R&D)$146,858,818
Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Radar and Navigational Facilities$109,636,045

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$1,122,350,507
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$839,005,843
NAVY, Department of the$105,038,480
Missile Defense Agency$29,414,277
Defense Logistics Agency$25,049,917

Top 10 Contractors

ITT Corporation$1,031,980,158
Lockheed Martin Corporation$258,213,012
Si International Engineering, Inc$131,761,068
Harris Corporation$85,153,016
Nana Regional Corporation, Inc.,$65,697,383
The Aleut Corporation$56,855,805
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation$51,848,054
Northrop Grumman Corporation$45,573,676
Federal Contracting, Inc.$38,398,488
Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.$35,501,075

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$1,913,731,311
2005$2,078,738,462
2006$2,287,995,582
2007$2,610,102,339
2008$1,952,661,861
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$1,075
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.