Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in New Hampshire
(FY 2002)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2002
Total dollars: $613,681,379
The amount for this search is 0.2% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 42 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 393
Total number of transactions: 3,091
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$169,706,675
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$48,732,179
Competition within a limited pool$80,255,539
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$3,657,232
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$6,661,723
Not competed for an allowable reason$303,666,006
Not identified, soon to be addressed$1,002,025

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$9,759,552
New Hampshire 1 (John E. Sununu)$4,453,616
New Hampshire 2 (Charles F. Bass)$3,302,104
Delaware At Large (Michael N. Castle)$1,810,560
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$536,958

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$72,173,056
Electronic Countermeasures, Counter-Countermeasures and Quick Reaction Capability Equipment$48,582,762
Miscellaneous Aircraft Accessories and Components$44,763,133
Technical Representation Services -- Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment$37,675,914
Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property -- Restoration of real property$34,540,356

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$167,838,247
NAVY, Department of the$163,895,899
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$135,136,269
Defense Logistics Agency$39,759,689
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$15,979,277

Top 10 Contractors

Bae Systems PLC$217,905,601
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (unknown parent company, no D&B number)$49,045,063
Weston Solutions Holdings Inc$39,170,475
Insight Technology Inc$21,351,132
Elbit Systems of America, LLC$18,452,111
Dci, Inc.$15,483,674
Crane & Co., Inc.$14,558,000
Red River Computer Co., Inc.$14,464,064
J.C.N. Construction Co Inc$14,127,945
Creare Incorporated$10,865,708

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$440,875,852
2001$535,658,385
2002$613,681,379
2003$622,589,571
2004$905,659,442
2005$1,192,480,300
2006$1,434,326,664
2007$1,723,049,843
2008$1,158,178,832
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$400,726
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 17, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.