Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $11,420,518,795
The amount for this search is 3.0% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 6 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 3,872
Total number of transactions: 126,228
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,783,936,509
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$1,477,249,564
Competition within a limited pool$1,230,251,205
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$141,056,304
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$417,244,569
Not competed for an allowable reason$5,051,937,762
Not identified, soon to be addressed$318,842,882

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Massachusetts 6 (John F. Tierney)$352,536,713
Massachusetts 8 (Michael E. Capuano)$248,218,206
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$244,208,670
Massachusetts 5 (Martin T. Meehan)$196,155,173
Massachusetts 4 (Barney Frank)$80,966,740

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Gas Turbines and Jet Engines, Aircraft; Prime Moving, and Components$1,111,233,428
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Automatic Data Processing Equipment (Including Firmware), Software, Supplies and Support Equipment$551,792,545
Guided Missile Components$382,813,361
Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$372,987,462
Miscellaneous Communication Equipment$335,751,469

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$2,924,444,823
NAVY, Department of the$2,880,235,245
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$2,627,767,849
Defense Logistics Agency$377,749,446
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$279,697,083

Top 10 Contractors

Raytheon Company$2,252,116,218
General Dynamics Corporation$2,097,170,143
General Electric Company$1,211,020,494
Massachusetts Institute of Technology$666,635,670
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc$294,876,525
The Mitre Corporation$275,321,549
Perini Corporation$200,970,655
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$183,961,028
Textron Inc.$168,783,707
Lockheed Martin Corporation$145,179,322

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$6,324,033,013
2001$6,996,031,828
2002$7,028,913,628
2003$8,459,874,073
2004$9,898,536,741
2005$11,420,518,795
2006$11,930,775,312
2007$13,896,554,220
2008$11,848,227,269
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$1,356,363
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 17, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.