![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
TFHRC Home > Safety > Safety Publications > Roadway Safety Hardware Asset Management Systems Case Studies > Index
View PDF Version (1199 KB)
Since the early 1990s, the term "asset management" has grown to embrace a broad array of tasks and activities aimed at identifying, assessing, prioritizing, evaluating, maintaining, rehabilitating, renewing, preserving, improving, and managing assets. This report addresses asset management of roadway safety hardware in the United States. Increasingly refined and complex tools such as modern bridge and pavement inventory management systems have been developed and adopted by many State departments of transportation (DOTs), as well as some of the larger departments of county and municipal governments. Many of these management systems have been developed cooperatively by pooling funds and in other ways, such as assistance from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
Through maintenance and enhancement efforts, these software systems are growing in their robustness and capability to deal effectively with complex, real-world issues and conditions. One software management area that has not advanced as rapidly is roadway safety hardware inventory, which includes an array of signs, signals, roadway lighting luminaries, support structures for signs, guardrails, pavement markings, and deployed detecting devices—all vital to safe, efficient highway operations.
This study provides information to State DOTs on roadway safety hardware management systems that would help increase their use of state-of-the-practice techniques. This report was developed for State DOT personnel, particularly chief engineers and other top management, involved with the planning, funding, and execution of roadway safety hardware management systems.
Gary L. Henderson
Director,
Office of Infrastructure Research and Development
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
FHWA provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No FHWA–HRT–05–073 | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. | |
4. Title and Subtitle Roadway Safety Hardware Asset Management Systems Case Studies | 5. Report Date October 2005 | ||
6. Performing Organization Code N/A | |||
7. Authors(s) Mr. David J. Hensing, Dr. Shahed Rowshan | 8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Transportation Division 1710 SAIC Drive McLean, VA 22102 | 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) N/A | ||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-01-C-00180 | |||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Safety R&D Federal Highway Administration 400 7th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20590 | 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report, April 2005 |
||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code HRDS | |||
15. Supplementary Notes FHWA COTR, Kerry Perrillo Childress, Office of Safety R&D | |||
16. Abstract This study provides information to State DOTs on roadway safety hardware management systems that could help increase their use of state-of-the-practice techniques. This report was developed for State DOT personnel, particularly chief engineers and other top management, involved with the planning, funding, and execution of roadway safety hardware management systems. | |||
17. Key Words Asset management, roadway safety hardware |
18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. | ||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified | 20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified | 21. No. of Pages 92 | 22. Price |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8–72) | Reproduction of completed page authorized |
CHAPTER 2. CASE STUDIES OF STATE DOT ROADWAY SAFETY HARDWARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Approach To Selection CriteriaAPPENDIX A. FHWA LETTER TO DIVISION OFFICES
APPENDIX B. QUESTIONNAIRE TO STATE DOTS
APPENDIX C. SUMMARY OF AASHTO SURVEY RESULTS
APPENDIX D. LIST OF STATE DOT CONTACTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Photo. Data collection vanLIST OF TABLES
Table 1. New Mexico RFI data collectedFHWA-HRT-05-073 |
![]() |