Home
Fair Use
Who Owns What?
Creating MM
In the Digital Library
Copyright Management
Licensing
Resources
Online Presentations
Ask a Lawyer
Offsite
|
Guidelines for Management and Marketing of Copyrighted Works
Sec. 1 Rationale for Guidelines. The U. T. System Board of Regents
finds that works protected by copyright created at the component institutions
are valuable assets that promote and further the creation and dissemination
of knowledge through research, teaching and publication. Careful management
of these assets will benefit the authors, the citizens of Texas, state
government, the component institutions, and the U. T. System.
Sec. 2 Author-Owned Works. If component institutions invest
in copyright works that the authors will own under Regents' Rules and Regulations concerning Intellectual
Property, they must protect their investments and, with the authors,
manage such author-owned copyrights to facilitate institutional access
to the works and preserve rights to make nonprofit educational uses of
them. Such works may be authored by professionals, faculty, non-faculty researchers (researchers who do not teach), and undergraduate and graduate students.
2.1 Allocation of Rights. For projects that may involve
significant resource contributions by the institution, components institutions
and authors will
agree to allocate rights to use the resulting works, allocate costs
and share benefits from commercialization, as appropriate in each case.
Institutions should:
a. determine what constitutes
significant kinds or amounts of resource contribution;
b. identify appropriate
institutional uses for the work;
c. develop check-points
in the creative process that will alert authors and administrators
of the need to enter an agreement to allocate
rights to use works and share costs and benefits from commercialization;
d. establish a default
allocation of interests including a right to use the work, to obtain
reimbursement of contributions and to share in profits in the absence
of agreement; and
e. take into account the
effects of third party funding, if any.
2.2 Electronic Distribution. Component institutions and
authors should
explore mutually beneficial opportunities for electronic distribution
of scholarly works within the university community.
2.3 Reservation of Rights in Articles. Authors should manage their
copyrights to preserve rights to make nonprofit educational uses of
their works. For example, authors
may request that for-profit publishers to whom the author submits
articles for publication use one of the the following copyright
notices, or something similar, on the author's article.
Copyright [date]
[Publisher] Permission is granted for nonprofit educational uses
of this [article]. All other uses require permission from the
publisher.
Copyright [date]
[Publisher] Permission is granted for nonprofit educational and
library duplication and distribution, including but not limited
to reserves and course packs made by nonprofit or for-profit copy shops.
This permission is in addition to rights granted under Sections
107, 108 and other provisions of the U.S. Copyright Act. To use
this work electronically, please link to [URL].
If a publisher agrees
to use a notice like these, university professionals, faculty, students
and staff would be able to make copies of the author's article for
research or classroom use without permission, even though the author
may have assigned copyright to the publisher as a condition of publication.
2.4 Reservation of Rights in Drafts. Another example of copyright
management that helps to achieve the purposes of these guidelines is
retention by professionals, faculty, non-faculty
researchers and students of copyright in
their pre-publication drafts. This allows
pre-print distribution within the university community and the creation
by the author of derivative (new) works from pre-publication drafts.
The intention to retain rights should be clearly stated in an agreement
with the publisher. The following clause could be added to a publisher's
existing agreement:
Anything to the
contrary in this agreement notwithstanding, Author shall retain
copyright in each and every draft of the [manuscript] except the
final draft as published by Publisher, and reserves all rights
in such pre-publication drafts.
Refer to the Copyright
Crash Course section on Copyright Management for more information
on this subject.
Sec. 3 Board Ownership - Work for Hire. On some occasions when a component
institution hires a professional, faculty member, non-faculty researcher
or student specifically to create a work that the author would otherwise
own under Subsection 2.3 of the Intellectual Property
Policy, it may be unclear that this is a work for hire. If this is
ever the case, the author should execute an acknowledgment
that the work is within the scope of employment and that the Board will
own copyright in the work to avoid later confusion over ownership.
Sec. 4 Board Ownership - Works Authored by Staff. Works authored by employees
other than professionals, faculty, non-faculty researchers and students
are owned by the Board or jointly owned by the Board and other
authors
4.1 Further Mission of Board. Component institutions should
manage copyrights owned by the Board under the Regents' Rules and Regulations concerning Intellectual
Property Policy to further the goals and mission of the U. T. System
and the Board, such as wide and free distribution.
4.2 Commercial Publication. Component institutions should
carefully consider the consequences of commercial marketing of scholarly
and educational works. Commercial publication or distribution may severely
limit access to works for others in the university community or the
public generally.
4.3 Reservation Rights in Drafts. For certain works, use of
the copyright notices above, or retention
of rights in prepublication drafts may be appropriate.
|
|