Cyberlaw Clinic

The Cyberlaw Clinic provides legal representation to private litigants and other clients in matters involving the public interest and technological development. The Cyberlaw Clinic gives students an opportunity to participate in supervised litigation, policy and legislative advocacy in matters involving technology and the public interest. Through the Clinic, students will develop and hone skills in interviewing and counseling, fact investigation, issue identification, case theory, development, planning and organization, discovery and motions practice, ethics, negotiation and oral advocacy. Bar Certified law students work directly with clients, file legal motions and briefs and argue matters in court.

The Clinic is seven credits and offered in both Fall and Spring Semesters. Additionally, students from the Clinic may, with the consent of the instructor, continue their work as Advanced Clinic Students for additional credits.

Recent Cyberlaw Clinic news

Fair Use Protection Limits Common Law Copyright Claims Over Sound Recordings in New York

EMI Records sought to enjoin Premise Media Corporation (Premise) from using a clip from John Lennon’s song, Imagine, in the documentary film, EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed. The court did not issue guidance on the exact amount of use needed to constitute copyright infringement. Instead, the court ruled that EMI was unlikely to win on the merits of the case because the fair use defense likely applied to Premise’s use of Imagine. The court denied the injunction since granting one would cause harm.

EMI Records v. Premise Media

Jacobsen v. Katzer/Kamind – Federal Circuit Upholds a Free Software License

by Zohar Efroni, posted on August 14, 2008 - 6:50am.

As reported by Lessig and others, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded yesterday a ruling by the Northern District of California which denied the copyright claims of an open source software developer for violations of the Artistic License. This is a landmark decision which is likely to influence all types of free licensing, including Creative Commons licenses and the question of enforceability of copyright claims upon violation of free licenses in general. Here are four quick points on the decision:

The Cost of Bogus Copyright Claims: BT Wins Motion for Attorneys' Fees

by Julie Ahrens, posted on August 12, 2008 - 3:34pm.

In a decisive victory for defendants beleaguered by baseless copyright infringement claims, U.S. District Court Judge Pauley ruled last week that Plaintiffs Ralph Vargas and Bland- Ricky Roberts must pay Defendants BT and East West Communications $175,000 in attorneys' fees and costs.

Substantive Tags: Fair Use Project

Aguiar v. Webb: Webb Defeats Aguiar's Preliminary Injunction Motion

by Julie Ahrens, posted on February 21, 2008 - 5:14pm.

Floyd Webb successfully defeated William Aguiar’s motion for a preliminary injunction last Friday at a hearing before Judge Wolf in the Massachusetts District Court in Boston.

Substantive Tags: Fair Use Project

Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Rowling Running Over Fair Use Like The Hogwarts Express?

by Anthony Falzone, posted on February 13, 2008 - 7:47pm.

On the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Dan Slater notes the growing reaction against Rowling's copyright claims against RDR Books, and generates a spirited discussion of her position. Read it all here.


Cases