PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
[a/k/a NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 WASTE AREAS)]
WARMINSTER TOWNSHIP, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
On the basis of its evaluation of available environmental information, ATSDR concluded that exposures to contaminants in groundwater, surface soil, surface water, and sediment at NAWC are below levels that cause adverse health effects. Because exposure to low levels of contamination is possible, ATSDR has categorized this site as no apparent public health hazard. In evaluating exposures to contaminants found in one off-site municipal water supply system and exposures to lead in paint, dust, and soil in homes, ATSDR concluded that these exposures posed an indeterminate health hazard (definitions of categories are provided in the glossary in Appendix E). Conclusions regarding media- and site-specific exposures are as follows.
ATSDR recommends that the following actions be taken to ensure continued protection of public health at NAWC and in surrounding communities.
The Public Health Action Plan (PHAP) for NAWC contains a description of actions taken and those to be taken by the ATSDR, Navy, EPA, PADEP, and Bucks County Health Department at and in the vicinity of the base subsequent to the completion of this PHA. The purpose of the PHAP is to ensure that this PHA not only identifies potential and ongoing public health hazards, but provides a plan of action designed to mitigate and prevent adverse human health effects resulting from exposure to hazardous substances in the environment. The public health actions that are completed, being implemented, or planned are listed below.
Groundwater
Soil
Lead Paint
Groundwater
Surface Water/Sediment
This report was prepared under the direction and supervision of the following individuals:
Charles Grosse, M.S., REM
Environmental Health Scientist
Federal Facilities Assessment Branch
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation
Gary Campbell, Ph.D.
Environmental Health Scientist
Federal Facilities Assessment Branch
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation
Assistance in the preparation of this report was provided by:
Thomas R. Stukas
Regional Representative
ATSDR Regional Office (Region III)
Sarah N. Dun, M.S.
Public Health Scientist
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 1992. Draft Site Summary Report, Naval Air Development Center (NADC), Warminster, Pennsylvania from the Health Assessment Activities at the Department of Defense National Priorities List Sites for FY91 (Draft). March 1992.
ATSDR. 1997a. Toxicological profile for polychlorinated biphenyls. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 1997.
ATSDR. 1997b. Toxicological profile for tetrachloroethylene. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 1997.
ATSDR. 1997c. Toxicological profile for trichloroethylene. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 1997.
ATSDR. 1998a. Toxicological profile for arsenic. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. August 1998.
ATSDR. 1998b. Toxicological profile for chromium. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. August 1998.
ATSDR. 1999a. Health Consultation, Derewal Property, Warminster, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, CERCLIS No. PA0000076224. May 5, 1999.
ATSDR. 1999b. Toxicological profile for lead. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. July 1999.
Ambler Laboratories. 1979. Correspondence to the Warminster Municipal Township Authority Re: Well 26 TCE Contamination. September 28, 1979.
Ames, T. 1998. Personal communication with Thomas Ames, Base Environmental Coordinator, NAWC Warminster. May 7, 1998, July 30, 1998, and November 20, 1998.
Ames, T. 1999. Personal communication with Thomas Ames, Base Environmental Coordinator, NAWC Warminster. February 18, 1999 and March 10, 1999.
Ames, T. 2000. Personal communication with Thomas Ames, Base Environmental Coordinator, NAWC Warminster. April 18, 2000 and May 3, 2000.
Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 1997. Correspondence to the Warminster Municipal Township Authority Re: Well 26 Sample Analysis Report. January 1997.
Brown & Root Environmental Corporation (Brown & Root). 1996a. Site 6 Removal Evaluation Report, Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania. July 1996.
Brown & Root. 1996b. Interim Remedial Investigation Report for Operable Unit 4, NAWC Warminster. October 1996.
Brown & Root. 1996c. Phase III Remedial Investigation Report (Media Other Than Groundwater), NAWC Warminster. November 1996.
1990 Census of Population and Housing. 1991. Summary Tape Files 1A and 1B (Pennsylvania) [machine-readable data files]. Prepared by the Bureau of Census. Washington, DC: The Bureau [producer and distributor], 1991.
2000 Census of Population and Housing. 2000. Summary Tape Files 1 (Pennsylvania). Prepared by the Bureau of Census. Washington, DC, 2000.
Department of the Navy. 1993. Record of Decision, Naval Air Development Center (OU1). September 30, 1993.
Department of the Navy. 1994. NAWC Warminster Fact Sheets No. 1 to 5. March 1994-July 1996.
Department of the Navy. 1995. Record of Decision, Naval Air Development Center (OU3). March 9, 1995.
Department of the Navy. 1996. Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Disposal and Reuse, Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Warminster, Pennsylvania. December 1996.
Department of the Navy. 1997a. Lead Management Plan, Senior Enlisted Quarters, Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove. January 1997.
Department of the Navy. 1997b. Record of Decision, Naval Air Development Center (OU4). September 30, 1997.
Department of the Navy. 1997c. Consensus Document, No Further Action For Site 4, Draft. October 1997.
Department of the Navy. 1999. Record of Decision for OU5 (Site 8). September 1999.
Department of the Navy. 2000a. Record of Decision for OU6 (Soil, Surface Water, and Sediment Associated with Site 4). April 2000.
Department of the Navy. 2000b. Record of Decision for OU7 (Soil ans Waste at Sites 6 and 7). June 2000.
Department of the Navy. 2000c. Record of Decision for OU8 (Soils in Area D). June 2000.
Department of the Navy. 2000d. Record of Decision for OU9 (Area A Soils, Surface Water, and Sediment). June 2000.
Department of the Navy. 2000e. Record of Decision for OU10 (Site 5 Soils and Area B Surface Water and Sediment). September 2000.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. (EA Engineering). 1995. Basewide Environmental Baseline Survey, Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Warminster, Pennsylvania, Final. March 25, 1995.
Feeney, J. 2000. Personal communication with James Feeney, EPA Remedial Project Manager for Fischer & Porter Company site. October 20, 2000.
Fischer & Porter Company. no date. Record of Decision, Fischer & Porter Company Site, Decision Summary.
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler). 1998. Close-Out Report, Various Source Removal Sites, Naval Air Warfare Center. August 1998.
Gold, P. 1999. Personal communication with Pete Gold, EPA Site Assessment Manager for Casey Village. May 26, 1999.
Halliburton NUS. 1992. Phase II Remedial Investigation Report, NAWC Warminster. November 1992.
Halliburton NUS. 1993a. Phase II Remedial Investigation Report for Operable Unit 1, NAWC Warminster. April 1993.
Halliburton NUS. 1993b. Off-base Well Inventory and Sample Analysis Report for NAWC Warminster. September 1993.
Halliburton NUS. 1994a. Community Relations Plan for Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Warminster. March 1994.
Halliburton NUS. 1994b. Remedial Investigation Report for Operable Unit 3, NAWC Warminster. August 1994.
Halliburton NUS. 1995. Site 4 Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis Report for NAWC, Warminster, Pennsylvania.
Hunter, M. 1998. Personal communication with Mike Hunter, Base Environmental Engineer, NAWC Warminster. May 7, 1998.
NUS Corporation. 1985. Preliminary Assessment and Site Inspection of the Naval Air Development Center. June 7, 1985.
Ostrauskas, D. 1999. Personal communication with Darius Ostrauskas, EPA Remedial Project Manager for NAWC. June 1 and December 9, 1999.
Ostrauskas, D. 2000. Personal communication with Darius Ostrauskas, EPA Remedial Project Manager for NAWC. October 13, 2000.
Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH). 1981. Warminster Area Birth Defects Within Normal Levels. January 27, 1981.
PADOH. 1999. Health Consultation, Fischer & Porter Company. Completed under a Cooperative Agreement with ATSDR. March 15, 1999.
Pursel, A. 1998. Personal communication with Atwood Pursel, Jr., Manger at the Upper Southampton Municipal Water Authority. October 22, 1998.
Pursel, A. 1999. Personal communication with Atwood Pursel, Jr., Manager at the Upper Southampton Municipal Water Authority. June 16, 1999.
Smith, G. 1998. Personal communication with Geoff Smith, Manager at the Warminster Municipal Water Authority. October 19, 1998.
Smith, G. 1999. Personal communication with Geoff Smith, Manager at the Warminster Municipal Water Authority. June 16, 1999 and December 6, 1999.
Szamborski, N. 1998. Personal communication with Nancy Szamborski, Housing Director, NAWC Warminster. May 5, 1998.
Szamborski, N. 1999. Personal communication with Nancy Szamborski, Housing Director, NAWC Warminster. March 10 and 31, 1999.
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 1999a. Remedial Investigation Operable Unit 7 (OU7) Soils and Waste at Sites 6 and 7, Former Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania. November 1999.
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 1999b. NAWC Warminster Environmental GIS Layer, Release 2.0. December 1999.
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 2000a. Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) Meeting Minutes, Former Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Warminster, Pennsylvania. August 5, 1999 through February 3, 2000.
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 2000b, Record of Decision (ROD) for Operable Unit 6 (OU6), Former Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania. April 2000.
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 2000c, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for Operable Unit 9 (OU9) (Area A Media Other Than Groundwater) for Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania. April 2000.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999. Safe Drinking Water Act Information System search at http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/sdwis/sdwis_query.html . March 1999.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. Geohydrology and Distribution of Volatile Organic Compounds in Groundwater in the Casey Village Area, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. 1998.
Warminster Township. 1999. Zoning Map, Warminster Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. November 1999.
Table 1: Population and Housing Data Table
Population Data | Site Area* | Bucks County |
|
||
Total persons | 28.937 | 597,635 |
Total area, square miles | 19.99 | 607.64 |
Persons per square mile | 1,448 | 984 |
|
||
Percent male | 48.9 | 49.1 |
Percent female | 51.1 | 50.9 |
Percent white | 90.7 | 92.5 |
Percent black or African American | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Percent American Indian, Alaska Native or Aleut | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Percent Asian, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander | 2.2 | 2.3 |
Percent other races or two or more races | 3.6 | 1.8 |
|
||
Percent Hispanic origin | 4.9 | 1.8 |
Percent under age 10 | 14.5 | 13.6 |
Percent 65 and older | 12.5 | 12.4 |
|
Source: Census of Population and Housing, 2000: Summary File 1 (Pennsylvania)
* Census tracts 1016.03, 1016.05, 1016.07, 1016.08, 1016.09, 1017, 1049.02 and 1050.08 in Bucks County, Pennsylvania
Table 1: Population and Housing Data Table
Housing Data | Site Area* | Bucks County |
|
||
Households | 10,418 | 218,725 |
Persons per household | 2.76 | 2.69 |
|
||
Percent households owner-occupied | 72.8 | 77.4 |
Percent households renter-occupied | 27.2 | 22.6 |
Percent households mobile homes # | 0.1 | 2.8 |
Percent persons in group quarters | 0.8 | 1.5 |
|
||
Median value, owner-occupied households # | 147,600 | 140,000 |
Median monthly rent, renter-occupied households # | 449 | 524 |
|
Source: Census of Population and Housing, 2000: Summary File 1 (Pennsylvania)
# From U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 1 (Pennsylvania)
* Census tracts 1016.03, 1016.05, 1016.07, 1016.08, 1016.09, 1017, 1049.02 and 1050.08 in Bucks County, Pennsylvania
Table 2: Completed Exposure Pathways at NAWC Warminster
Exposure Pathway Elements |
|||||||
Pathway Name |
Contaminant |
Environmental Medium |
Point of Exposure |
Route of Exposure |
Time of Exposure |
Exposed Population |
Comments |
Groundwater (On-base NAWC water supply wells) |
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (primarily tetrachloro-ethylene [PCE] and trichloro-ethylene [TCE]) | groundwater | Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) water supply system | ingestion, inhalation, dermal (skin) contact |
past, current, future | On-base workers and residents
(In the past, as many as 3,300 workers and 25 residents were at NAWC. Currently, 500 workers and 25 residents are at NAWC.) |
Past: No public health hazards were identified.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) assessed potential
exposure doses based on the maximum detected contaminant concentrations
and conservative assumptions about how often and how long a person might
contact contaminants. The estimated exposure doses were below those reported
in the toxicology literature to result in potential adverse health effects. Current/Future: No public health hazards were identified. The three NAWC wells with contamination are no longer used as a drinking water supply. In addition, the Navy implemented source control measures (groundwater treatment and soil removal) and monitors contaminant migration. |
Groundwater (Off-base municipal supply wells and off-base private wells) |
VOCs (primarily PCE and TCE) and arsenic | groundwater | Well 26 of the WMWA supply system and private wells in Ivyland/Kirk Road neighborhood | ingestion, inhalation, dermal (skin) contact |
past, current, future | Off-base residents
(WMWA serves 40,000 area residents. An estimated 155 people in Ivyland/ Kirk Road use private well water.) |
Past: No public health hazards were identified.
ATSDR assessed potential exposure doses based on the maximum detected contaminant
concentrations and conservative assumptions about how often and how long
a person might contact contaminants. The estimated exposure doses were below
those reported in the toxicology literature to result in potential adverse
health effects. Current/Future: No public health hazards were identified. The Navy connected homes to municipal water supplies or installed groundwater treatment systems. WMWA installed a treatment system on Well 26. In addition, the Navy implemented source control measures (groundwater treatment and soil removal) and monitors contaminant migration. |
Surface soil (Soil contamination sites in restricted areas) |
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and metals | surface soil | Restricted Areas of NAWC
Area A (Sites 1, 2, 3, and Impoundment Area), Area B (Sites 6 and 7), and Area C (Sites 4, 8, Maintenance Area, and Tile Field) |
incidental ingestion and dermal (skin) contact | past | On-base workers
(In the past, as many as 3,300 workers were at NAWC. Currently, 500 workers are at NAWC.) |
Past: No contamination above comparison
values (CVs) was detected at Site 7 and the Tile Field. Infrequent and incidental
contact with contaminants in surface soil is unlikely to pose a public health
hazard. In addition, workers are expected to have worn proper protective
equipment, such as long pants, work gloves, and work boots. Current/Future: NAWC was closed under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program in 1996 and is no longer accessed daily by site workers. Removal actions have been completed at Sites 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. The Navy is remediated other sites as necessary to prevent future exposures. |
Surface Soil (Soil contamination sites located in the Shenandoah Woods housing complex) |
Aroclor-1254, benzo(a)pyrene, cadmium, and lead | surface soil | Shenandoah Woods housing complex
Area B (Site 5) |
incidental ingestion and dermal (skin) contact | past, current, and future | On-base residents
(An estimated 550 residents live in this housing complex.) |
Past/Current/Future: Sampling detected contaminants above CVs in only a small number of samples collected. Incidental contact with these contaminants is unlikely to pose a public health hazard based on an evaluation of potential exposures. |
Surface water and sediment (Areas A, B, and C) |
chloromethane, PCE, PAHs, and metals in surface water
PAHs, PCBs, pesticides, and metals in sediment |
surface water and sediment | drainage channels and tributaries in Areas A, B, and C associated with Little Neshaminy Creek and Southampton Creek | incidental ingestion and dermal skin contact | past, current, and future | on- and off-base residents
(There are an estimated 575 on-base and 8,500 off-base residents.) |
Past/Current/Future: Infrequent exposure during recreational use by residents is unlikely to pose a public health hazard based on an evaluation of exposure doses. Streams and drainage channels at NAWC and immediately down stream have insufficient flow to support a fish population. |
Lead paint (Officer Housing Units and Quarters A and B) |
lead | paint, dust, and soil | Officer Housing units and Quarters A and B | incidental ingestion | past, current, and future | NAWC residents
(Quarters with lead paint house 25 residents.) |
Past: Damaged lead paint was found in
less than 10% of the inspection points in each of eight homes found containing
lead paint. Lead exposure would have been infrequent. Only Quarters A had
lead in dust and soil samples above standards. Lead exposures in this home
could have resulted in increased blood lead levels. It is unknown, however,
if children or pregnant woman (the most vulnerable populations) resided
in these homes. Possible adverse health effects, therefore, are indeterminate. Current/Future: The Navy completed remedial actions at the officer housing area and Quarters A and B to prevent current and future exposures. |
Table 3: Completed Exposure Pathways from Water Supplies
Affected by Off-Base Sources
Exposure Pathway Elements |
|||||||
Pathway Name |
Contaminant |
Environmental Medium |
Point of Exposure |
Route of Exposure |
Time of Exposure |
Exposed Population |
Comments |
Groundwater (Off-base municipal wells affected by off-base sources)
|
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (primarily tetrachloro-ethylene [PCE] and trichloro-ethylene [TCE]) | groundwater | Upper Southampton Municipal Water Authority (SMWA) and Hatboro Water Authority (HWA) municipal water supply wells | ingestion, inhalation, dermal (skin) contact |
past, current, future | Off-base residents
(SWMA supplies water to 13,000 people and HWA supplies water to18,900 people.) |
Past: The Agency for Toxic Substance
and Disease Registry (ATSDR) determined that concentrations detected in
the SMWA wells were unlikely to cause harmful effects. ATSDR was unable
to evaluate past exposures to contaminants in the HWA wells because necessary
information was unavailable. Current/Future: No health hazards were identified. The municipal water authorities regularly monitor the water supply under state and local regulations. |
VOCs (primarily PCE and TCE) | groundwater | WHDC municipal water supply wells | ingestion, inhalation, dermal (skin) contact |
past, current, future | Off-base residents
(WHDC supplies water to 3,100 people.) |
The Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH) completed a Health Consultation in March 1999. They conclude that while past exposures occurred, the wells no longer pose a public health hazard because WHDC wells are treated and monitored under state and local regulations. PADOH also concluded that no increase in risk for cancer exists due to exposure to VOCs in the contaminated water supply. | |
Groundwater (Off-base private wells affected by off-base sources) |
VOCs (primarily PCE and TCE) | groundwater | Private wells in Speedway, Flying Heels, and Casey Village | ingestion, inhalation, dermal (skin) contact |
past, current, future | Off-base residents
(An estimated 130 people in Speedway, 240 people in Flying Heels use private well water. In the past, 215 Casey Village residents used private well water; these homes are now connected to the municipal supply. |
Past: No public health hazards were identified.
ATSDR determined that concentrations detected are unlikely to cause harmful
effects. Current/Future: No public health hazards were identified. The Navy connected homes to municipal water supplies or installed groundwater treatment systems. In addition, the Navy monitors contaminant migration to prevent future contamination of wells. |
Table 4: NAWC Past and Current Water Supply Wells
Well | Use | Comments |
1 and 2 | Fire Protection | Wells 1 and 2 contributed to the main drinking water supply system from the early 1940s until 1979 and were blended with water from Wells 3, 4, and 10. Wells 1 and 2 were closed in 1979 due to VOC contamination. |
3, 4, and 10 | Active | These wells supply the majority of the potable water at NAWC. Water from these wells is pumped into a large holding tank and blended prior to distribution. After base closure, Well 10 will be incorporated into the Warminster municipal water supply. |
5 | Closed | Well 5 provided drinking water to the officers quarters located along Jacksonville Road. Well 5 was closed in 1979 due to VOC contamination. This well is no longer used for any purpose. |
6 and 7 | Inactive | Well 6 is an inactive well that served Building 80, which is no longer in use. Well 7 is an inactive well that served Quarters A, which currently receives water from the municipal water supply. Both Wells 6 and 7 could be reactivated if needed. |
8 and 9 | Active | Wells 8 and 9 are currently active and serve Quarters B and Building 115, respectively. |
Source: NUS Corporation 1985; Halliburton NUS 1992; EA Engineering 1995; Ames 1999; Smith 1999.
Table 5: Summary of Past Data That Exceeded Comparison Values
in Off-Base and On-Base Drinking Water Wells
Chemical | Range of Detected Concentrations (ppb)1 | Frequency of Detection2 | Comparison Value (ppb) | Source | |||||
|
|||||||||
PCE | 36 | unknown | 5 | MCL | |||||
TCE | 293 | unknown | 5 | MCL | |||||
|
|||||||||
PCE | 17 | 1/1 | 5 | MCL | |||||
TCE | 67.8 | 1/1 | 5 | MCL | |||||
Arsenic | 3.7 | 1/1 | 0.02 50 |
CREG MCL |
|||||
|
|||||||||
PCE | 0.2 - 31 | 14/51 | 5 | MCL | |||||
Arsenic | 4.6 | 1/1 | 0.02 50 |
CREG MCL3 |
Sources: Halliburton NUS 1993a, 1993b; Ambler Laboratories 1979.
Notes:
CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
1,1-DCE | 1,1-dichloroethene |
cis-1,1-DCE | cis-1,1-dichloroethene |
MCL | maximum contaminant level |
PCE | tetrachloroethylene |
ppb | parts per billion |
TCE | trichloroethylene |
1The listed concentrations were detected when the
wells were active. A single value is presented when the range of detections
is unknown or the contaminant was detected in only one sample.
2Frequency of detection is the times sought/times detected
3EPA is currently considering lowering the
MCL for arsenic to between 10 and 20 ppb.
Table 6: Summary of Data that Exceed Comparison Values for
Water Supplies Affected by Off-Base Sources
Chemical | Range of Detected Concentrations (ppb)1 | Frequency of Detection2 | Comparison Value (ppb) | Source |
Off-Site Private Wells, Area 1 South (Speedway) | ||||
PCE | 0.3 - 6 | 3/37 | 5 | MCL |
TCE | 46 | 1/37 | 5 | MCL |
Off-Site Private Wells, Area 2 West (Flying Heels) | ||||
TCE | 3 - 6 | 3/73 | 5 | MCL |
Off-Site Private Wells, Area 2 East (Casey Village) | ||||
PCE | 0.1 - 480 | 30/74 | 5 | MCL |
TCE | 0.1 - 1,200 | 34/74 | 5 | MCL |
1,1-DCE | 0.1 - 19 | 20/74 | 7 | MCL |
cis-1,2-DCE | 0.4 - 530 | 21/74 | 70 | MCL |
Carbon tetrachloride | 6.9 - 8.7 | 2/74 | 5 | MCL |
Sources: Halliburton NUS 1993b
Notes:
CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
1,1-DCE | 1,1-dichloroethene |
cis-1,1-DCE | cis-1,1-dichloroethene |
MCL | maximum contaminant level |
PCE | tetrachloroethylene |
ppb | parts per billion |
TCE | trichloroethylene |
1The listed concentrations were detected when the
wells were active. A single value is presented when the contaminant was detected
in only one sample.
2Frequency of detection is the times sought/times detected.
Table 7: Summary of Surface Soil Data That Exceed Comparison
Values
Chemical | Range of Detected Concentrations (ppm)1 | Frequency of Detection2 | Comparison Value (ppm) | Source |
OU1, Area A, Site 2 | ||||
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.3 - 3.4 | 44/64 | 0.1 | CREG |
Antimony | 0.19 - 842 | 52/106 | 300 | RMEGadult |
Arsenic | 0.88 - 22.8 | 56/56 | 0.5 | CREG |
Lead | 8 - 80,800 | 112/112 | 400 | EPA SSL |
OU1, Area A, Site 3 (burn pit) | ||||
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.052 - 3.4 | 25/31 | 0.1 | CREG |
OU1, Area C, Site 4 (north runway landfill) | ||||
Benzo(a)anthracene |
0.079 - 0.87 | 13/144 | 0.87 | RBC |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.046 - 0.7 | 6/144 | 0.1 | CREG |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.058 - 1.1 | 18/144 | 0.87 | RBC |
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 0.069 - 0.088 | 2/144 | 0.087 | RBC |
OU1, Area B, Site 5 (south runway landfill and Shenandoah Woods housing complex) | ||||
Aroclor-1254 | 0.02 - 24 | 19/36 | 1 | EMEGchild |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.067 - 0.27 |
3/29 |
0.1 |
CREG |
Cadmium | 0.63 - 10.5 | 18/34 | 10 | EMEGchild |
Lead | 7.5 - 1,020 | 36/36 | 400 | EPA SSL |
OU3, Area B, Site 6 (disposal pits and trenches) | ||||
Aroclor-1260 | 0.013 - 1 | 6/29 | 0.4 | CREG |
Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.042 - 13 | 5/29 | 7.8 | RBC |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.045 - 11 | 5/29 | 0.1 | CREG |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.054 - 13 | 6/29 | 7.8 | RBC |
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 0.044 - 1.2 | 3/29 | 0.78 | RBC |
Arsenic | 4.6 - 15.1 | 29/29 | 0.5 | CREG |
Chromium | 13.2 - 2,760 | 29/29 | 2,000 | RMEGadult |
Lead | 8.3 - 634 | 20/20 | 400 | EPA SSL |
Mercury | 0.05 - 25.6 | 11/29 | 23 | EPA SSL |
OU3, Area B, Site 8 (fire-fighting training area) | ||||
Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.079 - 0.93 | 10/18 | 0.1 | CREG |
Arsenic | 2 - 33.4 | 38/38 | 0.5 | CREG |
Lead | 9.4 - 999 | 41/41 | 400 | EPA SSL |
Dioxins3 | 0.06 | 13/13 | 0.05 | ATSDR guidance |
Sources: Brown & Root 1996b; Department of the Navy 1999, 2000a-e; Halliburton NUS 1995; Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 1999a, 2000b, 2000c.
Notes:
adult | standard for an adult |
child | standard for a child |
CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
EMEG | Environmental Media Evaluation Guide |
EPA | U. S. Environmental Protection Agency |
ppm | parts per million |
RBC | EPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration |
RMEG | Reference Does Media Evaluation Guide |
SSL | Soil Screening Level |
1A single value is presented when the contaminant
was detected in only one sample.
2Frequency of detection is the times sought/times
detected.
3The concentration reported for dioxins is
the toxicity equivalent (TEQ) calculated using ATSDR's Dioxin and Dioxin-Like
Compounds in Soil Interim Policy Guidance. Under this guidance, concentrations
for multiple dioxin congeners are summed and expressed as a TEQ for the most
toxic form of dioxin. To calculate a TEQ for dioxin congeners at NAWC, ATSDR
used the maximum detected concentrations for each congener.
Table 8: Summary of Surface Water Data That Exceed Comparison
Values
Chemical | Range of Detected Concentrations (ppb)1 | Frequency of Detection2 | Comparison Value3 (ppb) | Source |
OU1, Area A | ||||
Chloromethane | 4 | 1/13 | 1.5 | RBC |
PCE | 1 | 1/13 | 0.7 | CREG |
Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.1 | 1/8 | 0.092 | RBC |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.2 | 1/8 | 0.092 | RBC |
Cadmium | 2.5 | 1/16 | 2 | EMEGchild |
Lead | 2.9 - 28.5 | 5/15 | 15 | MCL action level |
Manganese | 15.1 - 486 | 15/16 | 50 | RMEGchild |
Thallium | 2 | 1/15 | 0.4 | LTHA |
OU1, Area B | ||||
Thallium | 4.9 | 1/4 | 0.4 | LTHA |
OU3, Area C | ||||
Lead | 1.1 -22.7 | 5/7 | 15 | MCL action level |
Manganese | 156 | 1/1 | 50 | RMEGchild |
Sources: Brown & Root 1996b.
Notes:
child | standard for a child |
CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
EMEG | Environmental Media Evaluation Guide |
EPA | U. S. Environmental Protection Agency |
LTHA | Lifetime Health Advisory |
MCL | Maximum Contaminant Level |
ppb | parts per billion |
RMEG | Reference Does Media Evaluation Guide |
SSL | Soil Screening Level |
RBC | EPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration |
1A single value is presented when the contaminant
was detected in only one sample.
2Frequency of detection is the times sought/times
detected
3Comparison values for drinking water are
presented because media-specific comparison values for surface water are not
available. Drinking water comparison values may be considered overly conservative
for use with surface water because these values are derived assuming daily ingestion.
Surface water is present only part of the year, making daily ingestion impossible.
In addition, surface water from NAWC is not used as a drinking water supply.
Table 9: Summary of Sediment Data That Exceed Comparison
Values
Chemical | Range of Detected Concentrations (ppm)1 | Frequency of Detection2 | Comparison Value3 (ppm) | Source |
OU1, Area A | ||||
Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.39 - 20 | 19/19 | 0.87 | RBC |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.36 - 17 | 19/19 | 0.1 | CREG |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.54 - 25 | 19/19 | 0.87 | RBC |
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 0.29 - 13 | 19/19 | 5 | PADEP standard |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | 0.21 - 20 | 19/19 | 8.7 | RBC |
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 0.13 - 5.3 | 10/19 | 0.087 | RBC |
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene | 0.24 - 14 | 19/19 | 0.87 | RBC |
Aldrin | 0.0021 - 0.0785 | 5/21 | 0.04 | CREG |
Aroclor-1248 | 1.5 | 1/21 | 0.4 | CREG |
Aroclor-1260 | 0.16 - 1.5 | 3/21 | 0.4 | CREG |
Arsenic | 2 - 14.05 | 25/25 | 0.5 | CREG |
Chromium | 13.7 - 224 | 27/27 | 200 | RMEGchild |
Iron | 10,800 - 115,500 | 27/27 | 23,000 | RBC |
Lead | 23.9 - 404 | 27/27 | 400 | EPA SSL |
Manganese | 115 - 11,400 | 27/27 | 7,000 | RMEGchild |
OU1, Area B | ||||
Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.53 - 5.2 | 2/2 | 0.87 | RBC |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.45 - 4.4 | 2/2 | 0.1 | CREG |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.69 - 7.1 | 2/2 | 0.87 | RBC |
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 0.36 - 2 | 2/2 | 5 | PADEP standard |
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene | 0.32 - 2.4 | 2/2 | 0.87 | RBC |
Aroclor-1260 | 0.27 - 1.9 | 4/5 | 0.4 | CREG |
OU3, Area C | ||||
Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.27 - 0.66 | 5/9 | 0.1 | CREG |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.3 - 0.9 | 3/7 | 0.87 | RBC |
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 0.08 - 0.14 | 3/9 | 0.087 | RBC |
Arsenic | 12 - 8.5 | 11/11 | 0.5 | CREG |
Iron | 16,200 - 25,400 | 3/3 | 23,000 | RBC |
Sources: Brown & Root 1996b, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. 2000b.
Notes:
child | standard for a child |
CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
EMEG | Environmental Media Evaluation Guide |
EPA | U. S. Environmental Protection Agency |
ppm | parts per million |
RBC | Risk Based Concentration |
RMEG | Reference Does Media Evaluation Guide |
SSL | Soil Screening Level |
PADEP | Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection |
1A single value is presented when the contaminant
was detected in only one sample.
2Frequency of detection is the times sought/times
detected
3Comparison values for surface soil are presented
because media-specific comparison values for sediment are not available. Soil
comparison values may be considered overly conservative for use with sediment
because these values are derived assuming daily contact. A resident is unlikely
to use the stream for recreation every day.
Figure 2. NAWC, Area Designations, and Surrounding Neighborhoods
Figure 3. Demographic Statistics (1990)
Figure 3. Demographic Statistics (2000)
Figure 4. ATSDR's Exposure Evaluation Process
Figure 5. Fracture Trace Location Map
Next Section Table
of Contents