Volume 72 | Winter 2009 | Number 1 | |
---|---|---|---|
Conventions in Science and LawDavid Michaels and Neil Vidmar |
|||
David Michaels and Neil Vidmar |
i | ||
Irreconcilable Differences? The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law |
Susan Haack | 1 | |
Essay: Conventions in Science and in the Courts: Images and Realities |
Jerome R. Ravetz | 25 | |
The Arts of Persuasion in Science and Law: Conflicting Norms in the Courtroom |
Herbert M. Kritzer | 41 | |
Joseph Sanders | 63 | ||
Charles Bazerman | 91 | ||
How Much Evidence is Enough? Conventions of Causal Inference |
David Kriebel | 121 | |
Trials and Tribulations: What Happens When Historians Enter the Courtroom |
David Rosner | 137 | |
Merton and the Hot Tub: Scientific Conventions and Expert Evidence in Australian Civil Procedure |
Gary Edmond | 159 | |
Christopher S. Dodrill | 191 |
Law & Contemporary Problems and the Mills Conversation Series will be sponsoring a conference on race and socio-economic class at Duke Law School on Friday, January 23, 2009. This event will go from 9:00 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. in room 3037.
>> more