Issues and Policies
Workshop Aims To
Protect Asia-Pacific Region’s Food Supply from
Deliberate Contamination
January 2007
Printable version
By Linda Habenstreit
Attendees listen intently to food defense
workshop presentations.
Photos by Lydia W. Smith, FAS Office of
Capacity Building and Development |
Since
Sept. 11, 2001, the threat of food borne terrorism has
emerged as an increasingly important issue facing the
United States and other countries. Leading security
experts have warned that food supplies present an
attractive target for terrorism due to the open nature
of the food and agriculture system from production
through food manufacturing, processing, and
distribution.
For
example, ingredients used in food processing come from
many sources, both domestic and foreign. When these
ingredients are processed in large batches, biological,
chemical, physical, or radiological contamination could
be easily introduced and rapidly and widely distributed.
In addition, food products typically change hands
numerous times along the supply chain. At each
transition point, opportunity exists for deliberate
contamination. Perishable food products present a
special hazard. Because they are quickly distributed and
consumed, large numbers of people could become ill
before intentional contamination is detected.
Alexander Arvizu, deputy chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy,
Bangkok, speaks at workshop. |
APEC
Members Work To Address Vulnerabilities
APEC
(Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation)—a forum of 21
economies on both sides of the Pacific—accounts for
about 40 percent of world population, almost 50 percent
of world trade, nearly 60 percent of global gross
domestic product and, by some measures, nearly 70
percent of world economic growth in recent years.
Fellow
APEC members Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China,
Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New
Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines,
Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Chinese Taipei,
Thailand, and Vietnam buy two-thirds of all U.S. exports
and supply the United States with two-thirds of its
imports. The APEC economies buy three-quarters of U.S.
agricultural exports, making them important customers
for U.S. farmers, ranchers, processors, and exporters.
Because
APEC economies account for much of the world’s
agricultural trade, food borne terrorism threatens not
only the health and economic security of APEC members,
but the entire world.
Private sector experts give their perspectives on food
defense. Left to right: Dr. Chanchai Waimaleongora-ek,
vice president, Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company
Ltd., Thailand; James A. McWhirter, senior security manager,
Asia Pacific, Kraft Foods Singapore; and Jason Dale,
director, Group Supply Chain, Fonterra Cooperative Group
Ltd., New Zealand. |
United
States Spearheads Workshop
With
considerable expertise in addressing the security of the
domestic food and agricultural supply chain and
recognizing its global interconnectivity, the United
States is working with international partners within
APEC to build and enhance regional and global capacity
to reduce the risk of food borne terrorism.
In
November 2006, USDA, the U.S. Department of State and
HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
sponsored a food borne terrorism prevention and
mitigation workshop for APEC economies as a first step
in broader, ongoing APEC work on food defense.
The goal
of the workshop was to provide technical assistance and
training to attendees from APEC economies on defending
against food borne terrorism. The workshop provided
information on vulnerability assessment tools and
participants shared strategies on how to mitigate risk
of intentional acts of terrorism to the food supply.
USDA’s
Foreign Agricultural Service obtained funding for the
workshop from the State Department and USDA’s Emerging
Markets Program, which helps improve market access and
develop or promote U.S. agricultural exports through
cost-sharing with eligible applicants.
Jason Dale, director,
Group Supply Chain, Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd.,
provides his insights. |
USDA’s
Food Safety and Inspection Service and HHS’ Food and
Drug Administration provided faculty for the workshop
and offered their expertise in conducting vulnerability
assessments.
Food
Defense Workshop for APEC Economies Held
On Nov.
1-3, 2006, the United States, along with co-host
Thailand and co-sponsors Australia and Chile, held the
first-ever, APEC-sanctioned workshop "Mitigating the
Terrorist Threat to the APEC Food Supply" in Bangkok,
Thailand, in support of the U.S.-initiated APEC Food
Defense Initiative.
The
workshop brought together policymakers, technical
experts, and public- and private-sector stakeholders
from 17 APEC economies, including Australia, Chile,
China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New
Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese
Taipei, Thailand, the United States, and Vietnam.
Food
defense experts shared strategies to prevent attacks and
mitigate the impact of an attack on the food supply
chain. Attendees participated in exercises using
state-of-the-art prevention and mitigation techniques.
Eight APEC economies provided overviews of their
regulatory and oversight agencies, vulnerability
assessment strategies, risk communication, and
regulations.
Participants recommended that APEC economies:
-
engage in open and transparent discussions in key
government sectors, including agriculture, health,
trade, domestic law enforcement, and intelligence,
and
-
encourage frequent collaboration between their
public and private sectors and with developing and
emerging APEC economies to build their capacity to
reduce risk and mitigate the potential of a food
borne terrorist attack.
Panelists at closing of workshop. Left to
right: Sri-anant Wanasen, researcher,
National Center for Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology, Thailand; Dr. Warapa
Mahakarncahnakul, lecturer, Department of
Food Science and Technology, Kasetsart
University, Thailand; Dr. Natalia Comella,
U.S. Department of State; Isabelle Benoliel,
principal advisor to European Commission
director general; and Suboonya Hutangkabodee,
senior advisor, Thailand Ministry of Public
Health. |
At the
Nov. 18-19, 2006, APEC Leaders’ Meeting in Hanoi,
Vietnam, the United States highlighted these food
defense efforts. All 21 APEC leaders committed to
continued work on protecting the food supply from
deliberate contamination by developing APEC-supported
best practices or recommendations.
More
workshops and events on this topic are expected in the
future.
For more
information about the U.S. food defense initiative in
APEC, contact Steven Beasley in the FAS Office of
Capacity Building and Development. E-mail:
Steven.Beasley@usda.gov
Linda
Habenstreit is a public affairs specialist in the FAS
Public Affairs Division. E-mail:
Linda.Habenstreit@usda.gov
Food
Defense, Food Security, and Food Safety Are Not
Synonymous |
While
food safety, food security, and food defense are
important issues in their own right, they are not
synonymous. Food defense is the protection of food
products from intentional contamination by
biological, chemical, physical, or radiological agents.
Food
safety is the protection of food products from
unintentional contamination by biological or
chemical agents. Food security, according to the FAO
(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations), means that all people, at all times, have
access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet
their dietary needs and preferences for an active,
healthy life. |
CARVER +
Shock Method Assesses Food Sector Vulnerabilities |
One
strategy discussed at the workshop—the CARVER + Shock
method—is a tool used by the military to prioritize
offensive targets that has been adapted for the food
sector. It allows the user to assess and determine the
most vulnerable points in a system or infrastructure,
much like an attacker would. The user can then focus
resources on protecting these points.
CARVER
is an acronym for the attributes used to evaluate the
attractiveness of a target for attack:
-
Criticality—impact of an attack on public health and
the economy
-
Accessibility—ability to physically enter and leave
a target undetected
-
Recuperability—food system’s ability to recover from
attack
-
Vulnerability—ease of attacking a target
-
Effect—amount of direct loss to a target from the
attack, measured by loss of productivity
-
Recognizability—ease of identifying the target
A
seventh attribute in the modified CARVER
tool—shock—assesses the public health, economic, and
psychological impact of an attack, or the shock value of
a target.
Each
point in a food processing system is ranked for each
attribute according to its attractiveness on a scale
from one to ten. Conditions associated with low
attractiveness or low vulnerability are assigned low
values, while conditions associated with high
attractiveness or high vulnerability are assigned high
values. The total is summed across the 10 attributes.
Scoring the various elements of a food sector’s
infrastructure for each of the CARVER + Shock attributes
help identify where an attack on that infrastructure is
most likely to occur. |
|