Acquisition Workforce Training, Delegation, and Management System
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Office of Procurement
And Property Management
AGAR ADVISORY # 85
May 9, 2008
USDA Acquisition Workforce Training, Delegation and Management System
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Appendix A Qualification Standard for General Schedule Positions A-1
Appendix B OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 B-1
Appendix C The Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Program C-1
Appendix D Contracting Officer Warrant Authority for GS-1102/GS-1105 D-1
Appendix E Contracting Officer Warrant Authority for GS-1102 E-1
Appendix F Education and Training for GS-1102 F-1
Appendix G Training for COR/COTRs or Equivalent Positions G-1
Appendix H Contracting Officer Qualification Statement H-1
Appendix I Contracting Officer Representative Qualification Statement I-1
Appendix J Format for Contracting Office Warrant Request J-1
Appendix K USDA Federal Acquisition Certification in
Contracting Application Format K-1
Appendix L Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Checklist L-1
Appendix M The Federal Acquisition Certification for
Program and Project Managers M-1
Appendix N The Federal Acquisition Certification for
Contracting Officer Technical Representatives N-1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20250
This Advisory establishes the following procedures for the USDA Acquisition Workforce (AW) Career Management Program:
This AGAR Advisory does not cancel DR 5001-1 Departmental Regulation (DR) 5001-1 “Acquisition Workforce Training, Delegation, and Tracking Systems” dated September 30, 2003. However, guidance within this AGAR Advisory shall supersede DR 5001-1 Departmental Regulation (DR) 5001-1 “Acquisition Workforce Training, Delegation, and Tracking Systems” dated September 30, 2003, on an interim basis.
Contracting activities shall provide AW employees government-wide training for creating the skills necessary to deliver best value supplies and services, to find the best business solutions, and to provide strategic business advice to accomplish agency missions. On behalf of the Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO) and Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), each Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) is responsible for developing and maintaining an acquisition career management program that is in compliance with mandatory acquisition training and experience standards as outlined in this Advisory.
The guidance contained herein shall apply to the following acquisition workforce personnel:
In 1996, Congress passed the Clinger-Cohen Act (Act), Pub. L. 104-106, to establish education, training, and experience requirements for civilian agencies that are comparable to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) for the Department of Defense (DOD). This Advisory builds on that Act by implementing OFPP Policy Letter No. 05-01 and closely aligning civilian (non-DOD) and DOD workforce requirements.
ACM Acquisition Career Manager
AGAR Agriculture Acquisition Regulation
ACMIS Acquisition Career Management Information System
AW Acquisition Workforce
CAO Chief Acquisition Officer
CO Contracting Officer
COTR Contracting Officer Technical Representative
DAU Defense Acquisition University
DAWIA Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act
DOD Department of Defense
DR Departmental Regulation
EO Executive Order
FAC-C Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting
FAC-COTR Federal Acquisition Certification for Contracting Officer
Technical Representatives
FAC-P/PM Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers
FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation
FAI Federal Acquisition Institute
FPDS-NG Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation
FSS Federal Supply Schedule
GS General Schedule
GSA General Services Administration
HCA Head of the Contracting Activity
HCAD Head of the Contracting Activity Designee
IT Information Technology
NCMA National Contract Management Association
OFPP Office of Federal Procurement Policy (Office of Management and Budget)
OPPM Office of Procurement and Property Management
PPD Procurement Policy Division
SAP Simplified Acquisition Procedures
SPE Senior Procurement Executive
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
Whether warranted or unwarranted, GS-1102 employees are responsible for knowing, understanding, and performing contract duties commensurate with their grade level. Upon issuance of this Advisory, employees shall meet the FAC-C Level II requirements to qualify for a GS-1102-13 and above position. Two years after issuance of a revised version of DR 5001-1, employees shall meet the FAC-C Level III requirements to qualify for a GS-1102-13 and above position (See Appendix F). Hiring activities who are considering hiring individuals who do not meet the Qualification standard or FAC-C requirements shall coordinate with their Human Resource officer when submitting a waiver request in accordance with Paragraph 36. The hiring activity shall provide the Human Resource officer a copy of the approved SPE waiver prior to making a job offer.
Employees designated as COTRs must demonstrate an ability to perform selected pre-award and post-award administrative functions on behalf of the Contracting Officer.
Professional business and technical competencies for COTRs are listed on the FAI website. COTR training shall be as directed in Appendix G or as updated by FAI at (www.fai.gov). In lieu of formal classroom instruction, COTRs may obtain basic on-line training from the FAI Continuous Learning Center
Unwarranted Micro-purchase cardholders are not AW members. USDA issued purchase cards to employees to reduce the issuance of administratively costly purchase orders for inexpensive goods and services up to the Micro-purchase threshold. Purchase Card Managers are responsible for providing cardholders training prior to issuance of the purchase card.
The Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (FAC-C) program establishes mandatory core requirements for education, training, and experience for GS-1102 contracting professionals within civilian contracting activities. A FAC-C Level III is the acceptable standard throughout the Federal Government and is evidence that senior level employees have met the requirements for a GS-1102, grade 13 and above position.
Upon issuance of this Advisory, contracting officers issued new warrants must meet
the FAC-C program requirements at an appropriate level to support their warrant. Executive guidance defines new warrants as warrants issued for the first time in USDA.
In special situations, the SPE may waive the FAC-C training requirements for warranting purposes by granting a non-transferable waiver when it is determined to be in the best interest of the agency. Contracting activities shall submit their request through the HCA to the SPE. At a minimum, each request shall include a description of the deficiency, the estimated time required to meet the FAC-C warrant requirement, and the impact on the agency should the SPE not grant a waiver.
The CAO has determined non-GS-1102 contracting officers to be outside the scope of the FAC-C program. Therefore, their participation in the FAC-C program is highly advised, but not required to obtain a new warrant.
After completion of the requirements listed in Appendix L, employees must apply for a FAC-C certificate (see Appendix K) through their supervisor or other requesting official as directed by the agency. Verification of mandatory training for the specified FAC-C request level and a copy of any previous FAC-C certification shall be part of the submission package to the contracting activity. The ACM for the agency shall review the request and forward the FAC-C application, minus education and training documentation, to OPPM/PPD. Upon receipt, the USDA ACM will provide a final FAC-C review, verify employee documented training information in ACMIS, obtain SPE approval, and forward the signed FAC-C certificate back to the requesting agency HCA/HCAD.
The issuance of the FAC-C certificate at a specific level is a one-time process. The certificate represents completion of government-wide standards and each Executive agency shall accept the certificate as proof of competency for the certified level.
On April 25, 2007, the OFPP established guidelines for well-trained and experienced program and project managers. The guidelines help establish a partnership between program/project managers and contracting professionals. Details for the program are in Appendix M. OPPM will post the application process at www.usda.gov/procurement.
Contracting activities are responsible for establishing and managing their COTR programs. Each activity shall administer the program in accordance with the guidance in Appendix G. The HCA/HCAD shall assure the COTR enters applicable training information in ACMIS after issuance of the designation letter by the Contracting Officer and before issuance of the FAC-COTR certificate.
Agencies shall certify Level I COTRs no later than six months from the date of appointment. Level II or Level III COTRs shall meet the training and experience requirements within three months after assuming COTR duties. During unusual and compelling emergencies, when it is certain that a higher level COTR is needed but not available, the HCA/HCAD, on a one-time, non-delegable basis, may temporarily waive any COTR training requirements above the basic 40 hour minimum. Waivers shall document why the designated employee(s) will not have an opportunity to obtain the required training within the three-month timeframe and a proposed schedule for completion of the training.
COTRs who fail to meet the 40 CLP training requirement are not considered current in the FAC-COTR program. Inactive COTRs must meet the continuous learning requirement within six months from their date of appointment.
Contracting Officers and Program managers shall determine when a COTR is required and the level necessary to administer the contract.
Specific details on the FAC-COTR program are in Appendix N. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy and FAI will periodically update the FAC-COTR program. Federal FAC-COTR guidance and program changes shall take precedence over USDA guidance.
Unless authorized otherwise by the SPE in writing, the HCA and HCAD are the agency’s appointing officials for Contracting Officers. The HCA and HCAD shall determine if the appointment is consistent with applicable requirements of the AGAR, DR 5001-1, the FAR and other delegations of authority.
Appointing officials shall issue warrants when there is an organizational need for a Contracting Officer. Factors such as volume of actions, complexity of work, and organizational structure shall be major consideration when determining whether to grant a warrant request. The appointing official shall assure the applicant has demonstrated an ability to apply applicable procurement laws, regulations, policies, and sound business judgment.
Appointing officials shall grant Level I through Level III Contracting Officer warrants in writing on a Certificate of Appointment (SF-1402). The certificate shall state the employee’s name (not a position); limitations on the scope of warrant authority; and be displayed openly to the general public and agency personnel. Appointing officials shall ensure employees nominated as Contracting Officers meet the minimum requirements of Appendix D and Appendix E. The ACM shall periodically examine the qualifications and need for Contracting Officer appointments.
The following guidance is not mandatory for non-GS-1102 employees or GS-1102 employees applying for Level I Contracting Officer warrants.
Contracting Officers have authority to sign contracts up to their delegated warrant authority as specified on the SF-1402. They also have authority to use Government-wide purchase cards as a payment mechanism for contractual actions over the micro-purchase threshold and up to their delegated warrant authority or $1 million, whichever is less, after confirming the receipt of goods and services.
Contracting Officers shall not sign contracts, including modifications, options, estimated orders against an indefinite delivery contract, or any other agreement, that will result in the total amount of the contract exceeding their delegated warrant authority. In some situations, higher-level Contracting Officers must sign the contract when amendments or modifications to orders and contracts make the total amount of the contract exceed the Contracting Officer’s warrant limitation. Contracting Officers are not necessarily required to conduct or participate in every aspect of the contract personally. However, the Contracting Officer is the person responsible for assuring the signed document complies with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations.
Contracting Officers are legally responsible for their signed procurement documents. Contracting Officers cannot sign “for” or over the name of another Contracting Officer, or at a level exceeding the limitations stated on his or her warrant.
Appointing Officials may grant up to an unlimited amount of warrant authority to GS-1102 personnel. Warrant authority should be limited to the level necessary to support the agency’s procurement requirements. Contracting Officers shall meet all general and specialized requirements outlined requirements in Appendix D and Appendix E prior to the issuance of a warrant.
When authorized, GS-1105 personnel have authority to purchase supplies/services, IT products, construction, and architect/engineering contract requirements using the simplified acquisition procedures with the following limitations:
The contracting activity has the ultimate responsibility for determining the acceptability of intra-agency and interagency work assignments. Contracting Officers are authorized to award contracts for other agencies or government entities using the USDA Certificate of Appointment when the work assigned by their supervisor is an approved agency work project.
On occasion, the HCA/HCAD may delegate a COTR Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) authority, (e.g., award modifications against the contracts, etc.). A COTR who is also an ACO shall meet the requirements listed in Appendix D and Appendix E at a level equivalent to the estimated value of the contract with options.
Appointing officials may grant non-procurement personnel warrant authority to issue purchase orders and delivery orders up to $25,000 for commercial supplies and services, including construction. Non-procurement personnel granted procurement authority must comply with all Federal laws, rules, regulations, agency directives, FPDS reporting requirements, and other acquisition guidelines.
Employees may use ONE of the following equivalencies when they have a year or more of on-site procurement experience. Equivalent experience shall not exceed one year.
The Contracting Officer warranting requirement does not cover personnel carrying out transactions or executing documents listed below. Contracting activities should duly authorize and instruct employees on their responsibilities and limitations when obligating the Government using these procedures. Although the following transactions and documents are exempt by the FAR warranting requirements, a HCA/HCAD may require a warranted Contracting Officer to sign any or all of the listed procedures:
Contracting Officers and GS-1105/GS-1102 employees shall obtain a minimum of 80 CLPs every two years to remain current in the FAC-C training program. Employees working as COTRs shall obtain a minimum of 40 CLPs every two years to remain current in the COTR certification program as outlined in Appendix G. Program and project managers shall obtain a minimum of 80 CLPs as outlined in Appendix M. Failure to meet the continuous learning requirements may result in the termination of a Contracting Officer warrant, an outdated certification, or an inability to meet the GS-1102 qualification standard.
Continuous learning may include the study of new requirements, procedures caused by changes in law, regulations, policy, reviews, or business research. In addition to attending Government- wide training facilities, maintenance training may include non-mandatory classroom training, conferences, on-line courses, agency sponsored training, management/executive seminars, professional association-related projects, or any other training that enhances present acquisition job skills. Contracting activities shall not grant employees continuous learning credit for taking the same or similar course within a four-year period.
Agencies may credit employees with 60 CLPs of “general subject” training for certifications awarded during a continuous learning period. Professional organizations may include:
The HCA/HCAD may terminate or revoke a Contracting Officer warrant at any time. Termination/revocation is appropriate for the following situations
Contract Specialist awarding contracts for the performance of acquisition functions as outlined in OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 (Appendix B) shall assure solicited personnel meet comparable training requirements for government employees performing the same or similar functions.
The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities (including the hiring, developing, and assigning of personnel) based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, religion, disability, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital or family status, or sexual orientation.
USDA acquisition workforce personnel must comply with existing conflict of interest regulations/laws, and file the approved forms as required. At a minimum, all individuals whose duties involve procurement and contracting shall file a financial disclosure statement.
Acquisition workforce employees must also comply with the high standards of ethical behavior to assure complete trust in the integrity of the acquisition system.
The policy provided in this Advisory supersedes supplemental guidance issued by a contracting activity. A departure from this Advisory requires a written request and authorization from the SPE. Changes to the FAC-C, FAC-COTR, and FAC-P/PM programs by FAI supersede this Advisory. Federal program changes are not considered a departure from this Advisory.
Supplemental instructions and amendments to DR 5001-1 require review and concurrence by OPPM/PPD before issuance. Contracting activities are reminded that supplements shall not repeat, paraphrase, or restate policy guidance.
Unless otherwise specified, the SPE and CAO are the only individuals authorized to waive the requirements in this Advisory.
Direct all AW inquiries through agency channels to the Division Chief/OPPM/PPD or to ACM@usda.gov.
-END-
APPENDIX A
Qualification Standard for General Schedule Positions
Individual Occupational Requirements for
GS-1102 Contract Specialist Revised Standard Effective Date: January 1, 2000
The text below is extracted verbatim from Section IV-B of the Operating Manual for Qualification Standards for General Schedule Positions (p.166-167), but contains minor edits to conform to web-page requirements. This is an individual qualification standard developed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy under the authority of 41 U.S.C. 433. It does not apply to Department of Defense positions.
Basic Requirements for GS-5 through GS-12
A. 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field or;
B. At least 24 semester hours in any combination of the following fields: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management.
Applicants who meet the criteria for Superior Academic Achievement qualify for positions at the GS-7 level.
The following table shows the amounts of education and/or experience required to qualify for positions GS-7 thorough GS-12 covered by this standard.
GRADE EDUCATION OR SPECIALIZED
GS-7 |
1 full academic year of graduate education or law school or superior academic achievement |
1 year equivalent to at least GS-5 |
GS-9 |
2 full academic years of progressively higher level graduate education or masters or equivalent graduate degree or LL.B. or J.D. |
1 year equivalent to at least GS-7 |
GS-11 |
3 full academic years of progressively higher level graduate education or Ph.D. or equivalent doctoral degree |
1 year equivalent to at least GS-9 |
GS-12 and above |
(No educational equivalent) |
1 year equivalent to at least next lower grade level |
Equivalent combinations of education and experience are qualifying for all grade levels for which both education and experience are acceptable. |
Graduate Education. To qualify for GS-1102 positions on the basis of graduate education, graduate education in one or a combination of the following fields is required: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management.
Note - For positions at GS-7 through GS-12, applicants who are qualifying based on experience must possess at least one year of specialized experience at or equivalent to work at the next lower level, that provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform successfully the work of the position, in addition to meeting the basic requirements in paragraph A or B, above.
C. Exceptions: Employees in GS-1102 positions will be considered to have met the standard for positions they occupy on January 1, 2000. Employees who occupy GS-1102 positions at grades 5 through 12 will be considered to meet the basic requirements for other GS-1102 positions up to and including those classified at GS-12. This includes positions at other agencies and promotions up through grade 12. However, employees must meet specialized experience requirements when seeking another position.
Basic Requirements for GS-13 and Above
A. Completion of all mandatory training prescribed by the head of the agency for progression to GS-13 or higher level contracting positions, including at least 4-years experience in contracting or related positions. At least 1 year of that experience must have been specialized experience at or equivalent to work at the next lower level of the position, and must have provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform successfully the work of the position.
B. A 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree, that included or was supplemented by at least 24 semester hours in any combination of the following fields: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management.
C. Exceptions: Employees in GS-1102 positions will be considered to have met the standard for positions they occupy on January 1, 2000. This also applies to positions at the same grade in the same agency or other agencies if the specialized experience requirements are met. However, they will have to meet the basic requirements and specialized experience requirements in order to qualify for promotion to a higher grade, unless granted a waiver under Paragraph D.
D. Waiver: When filling a specific vacant position, the senior procurement executive of the selecting agency, at his or her discretion, may waive any or all of the requirements of Paragraphs A and B above if the senior procurement executive certifies that the applicant possesses significant potential for advancement to levels of greater responsibility and authority, based on demonstrated analytical and decision making capabilities, job performance, and qualifying experience. With respect to each waiver granted under this Paragraph D, the senior procurement executive must document for the record the basis of the waiver. If an individual is placed in a position in an agency on the basis of a waiver, the agency may later reassign that individual to another position at the same grade within that agency without additional waiver action.
APPENDIX B
April 15, 2005
OFPP POLICY LETTER 05-01
TO THE HEADS OF CIVILIAN EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Developing and Managing the Acquisition Workforce
1. Purpose. This Policy Letter establishes the government-wide framework for creating a federal acquisition workforce with the skills necessary to deliver best value supplies and services, find the best business solutions, and provide strategic business advice to accomplish agency missions.
2. Authority. This Policy Letter is issued pursuant to section 6(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 405(a)), and sections 37(b)(3) and (g) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 433(b)(3) and (g)).
3. Rescission. OFPP Policy Letters 92-3 and 97-01 are rescinded. Policy Letter 05-01 consolidates OFPP policy on acquisition workforce development.
4. Background. The quality and effectiveness of the federal acquisition process depend on the development of a capable and competent workforce. Congress recognized the need for a professional workforce through the passage of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) (10 U.S.C. §§ 1741-46) and section 4307(a) of the Clinger-Cohen Act (40 U.SC. §1401(3), amending section 37 of the OFPP Act (41 U.S.C. § 433)). These acts established education, training, and experience requirements for entry and advancement in the acquisition career fields for the Department of Defense (DOD) and civilian agencies respectively. Policy Letter 92-3, dated June 24, 1992, established policies for skill-based training in contracting and purchasing duties for all executive agencies. Policy Letter 97-01, dated September 12, 1997, established career management, education, and training requirements for contracting personnel in civilian executive agencies. This Letter builds on those previous efforts to improve the development of the acquisition workforce by more broadly defining the acquisition workforce and more closely aligning civilian (non-DOD) and defense acquisition workforce requirements.
5. Applicability. This Letter applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to DAWIA.
The acquisition workforce includes individuals who perform various acquisition-related functions to support the accomplishment of an agency’s mission. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA) (P.L. 108-136) defines acquisition to include, among traditional contracting functions, requirements definition, measurement of contract performance, and technical and management direction. One of the principal purposes of this Letter is to include formally these individuals in the definition of the acquisition workforce so they can be trained and developed using common standards.
To facilitate the identification of individuals included in the acquisition workforce, agencies shall consider the functions performed by those individuals. Membership in the acquisition workforce may be on a full-time, part-time, or occasional basis. For example, members of the acquisition workforce may include: individuals who are substantially involved in defining, determining, and managing requirements,
At a minimum, the acquisition workforce of an agency, for purposes of this Letter, includes:
6. Agency Responsibilities.
a. Authority - In accordance with section 16(b)(6) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 414(b)(6)), sections 37(g)(1) and (g)(3) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. §§ 433(g)(1) and (3)), and subject to the authority, direction, and control of the
head of an executive agency, the CAO, or equivalent, shall develop and maintain an acquisition career management program to ensure the development of a competent, professional workforce to support the accomplishment of agency mission. The CAO is responsible for identifying the members of the agency’s acquisition workforce and for implementing a budget strategy that reflects the workforce’s development needs and organizational structure of the agency. This strategy might include identifying funding sources, establishing a methodology for prioritizing funding needs, and otherwise institutionalizing a process for maximizing the agency’s acquisition workforce training budget. The CAO shall carry out the powers, functions, and duties of the agency head with respect to implementation of this Letter. The CAO may delegate this responsibility to a level no lower than the deputy CAO, or equivalent, and may appoint functional advisors for each segment of the acquisition workforce (i.e. contracting, program management, etc.) to facilitate the management of the agency’s acquisition workforce, in accordance with the requirements of this Letter. The CAO shall consider appointing senior civil service managers as functional advisors to promote technical continuity in advising the CAO on career management issues in the various disciplines.
b. Inclusion of Acquisition Workforce in Agency Human Capital Plans - The CAO, in consultation with agency acquisition career managers and functional advisors, shall provide to the agency’s Chief Human Capital Officer, or equivalent, substantial input to the agency’s human capital strategic plan regarding the acquisition workforce. This may include recruitment needs and hiring strategies, relevant agency workforce statistics, skills assessments, accession plans, workforce development initiatives, and performance incentive plans (in accordance with section 37(b)(1) of the OFPP Act, 41 U.S.C. § 433(b)(1)). Additionally, the CAO is responsible for assessing the current skills inventory of the workforce, identifying short- and long-term agency needs, and establishing plans, including recruitment and retention strategies, for obtaining the acquisition workforce resources and skills required to meet future agency mission needs.
c. Agency Acquisition Workforce Management - The CAO, or designee, shall appoint an individual with acquisition experience to lead the agency’s acquisition career management program. The Acquisition Career Manager (ACM) will be responsible for ensuring that the agency’s acquisition workforce meets the requirements of this Letter. At a minimum, the ACM shall:
The CAO shall forward the name and contact information (phone number, email, etc.) of the person designated to perform these roles to the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) at ACMinfo@fai.gov not later than October 1, 2005, and shall update this information, as needed, to ensure that agencies receive timely information from FAI and Defense Acquisition University (DAU) regarding training and development opportunities and other related information.
7. Core Competencies. The development of a highly-qualified, well-trained workforce will generally be based on a framework of core competencies that are common to defense and civilian agencies. DOD maintains core competencies that OFPP, in consultation with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) shall consider for civilian agency use in fulfilling the requirements of this Letter. OFPP, in consultation with OPM, and DOD shall also establish a process for updating these competencies, as needed, and developing specialized competencies for particular areas of focus. Agencies may require their acquisition workforce members to obtain additional competencies to fulfill agency mission needs.
8. Federal Acquisition Certifications.
a. General - OFPP’s vision for the federal acquisition workforce is the development of common certification programs that generally reflect a government-wide standard for education, training, and experience leading to the fulfillment of core competencies in a variety of acquisition-related disciplines. To promote the development of core acquisition competencies government-wide and to facilitate employee mobility, FAI, in consultation
with OPM, shall develop federal acquisition certification programs that shall be accepted by, at a minimum, all civilian executive agencies. These certifications will generally serve as one means to demonstrate that an employee meets the core education, training, and experience requirements, as appropriate, for that acquisition-related discipline (e.g., contracting, program management, etc.). Agency-specific certification programs are not transferable to other agencies.
Federal acquisition certifications shall be offered to, though not necessarily required of, the general acquisition workforce as defined in this Letter and further identified by agency CAOs. However, agencies may specify a particular type and/or level of certification when establishing quality ranking factors when it is determined that the certification is job related.
b. Federal Acquisition Certification - Contracting (GS-1102) Series - Not later than January 1, 2006, FAI, in partnership with DAU, shall develop a certification program that considers a variety of means, including a fulfillment process, for assessing and certifying that the education, training, and experience requirements for the GS-1102 series, as described herein, have been met. The program shall be based on the DAWIA requirements for certification at the junior, intermediate, and senior levels to reflect the need to meet increasingly more rigorous standards for education, training, and experience throughout the career development process. The Chief Acquisition Officers Council (CAOC) shall approve the program. Once granted, the certification shall be accepted by, at a minimum, all civilian executive agencies as evidence that an employee meets the core education, training, and experience requirements for the GS-1102 series.
The GS-1102 federal acquisition certification is not mandatory for all GS-1102s. However, members of the workforce issued new CO warrants on or after January 1, 2007, regardless of GS series, must be certified at an appropriate level to support their warrant obligations. New CO warrants are defined as warrants issued to employees for the first time at a department or agency. This requirement does not apply to senior level officials responsible for delegating procurement authority or those whose warrants are generally used to procure emergency goods and services.
CAOs shall establish agency-specific requirements for tying warrant levels to certification levels based on agency needs. However, agencies are encouraged to require a senior level certification for any employee issued an unlimited Contracting Officer’s warrant on or after January 1, 2007. The SPE of a civilian agency may waive this requirement in writing, on a case-by-case basis, if granting a waiver is in best interest of the agency. This authority may not be delegated, and the use of this authority shall be adequately documented. This waiver is not transferable to another agency. The CAO shall ensure that an employee’s warrant information is entered and maintained in ACMIS (see paragraph 12).
c. Federal Acquisition Certification - Program and Project Managers - A cross-agency and cross-functional working group will be formed to assist FAI in developing recommendations for the establishment of certification programs for program and project managers that are guided by the general competencies, experience, and training associated with the DAWIA requirements, accepted industry certification programs, and existing government requirements, such as the qualification requirements established by the Chief Information Officers Council (CIOC) for information technology project management.
FAI shall work with the CAOC, the CIOC, the Chief Financial Officers Council, the Chief Human Capital Officers Council, and other organizations with subject matter expertise, as appropriate, to ensure that these certification programs reflect the needs and priorities of the community and meet the general requirements of this Letter. FAI shall develop these recommendations not later than October 1, 2006.
Not later than, January 1, 2007, agency CAOs shall identify program and project managers who will be subject to the requirements of this Letter, and shall establish appropriate timeframes and policies for applying the certification program requirements. (For example, agencies may choose to require certification for individuals working on certain critical agency projects or programs, those of a certain dollar threshold, or other high visibility programs and projects.) Individuals identified by the CAO as subject to this Letter shall ensure that the appropriate information is included in ACMIS (see paragraph 12) so that workforce data may be captured for future training and development planning.
d. Federal Acquisition Certification - Other Acquisition-Related Positions - At the direction of the FAI Board of Directors, FAI shall develop additional recommendations for certification programs that are guided by the general competencies, experience, and training associated with the DAWIA requirements and accepted industry certification programs for other acquisition-related positions (see paragraph 5), excluding requirements for CORs and COTRs (see paragraph 9).
9. Contracting Officer’s Representatives (CORs) and Contracting Officer’s Technical Representatives (COTRs). The CAO is responsible for developing basic and refresher training requirements to ensure CORs and COTRs are adequately trained for the functions they perform in the acquisition workforce. FAI and DAU have a number of continuous learning resources to assist agencies in this effort (see http://www.whitehouse.gov/goodbye/6f28a0148c29dd67d271be1b9bb2aa082764ac55.html and http://www.whitehouse.gov/goodbye/a845c611abc06095342e223bee6b9abdde233699.html). CAOs shall require that CORs and COTRs enter their information into ACMIS (see paragraph 12) to ensure that agency acquisition workforce information is complete.
CAOs shall establish agency requirements for continuous learning for CORs and COTRs. Agencies are encouraged to require, at a minimum, 40 continuous learning points every two years for CORs and COTRs. Additionally, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy may prescribe specific continuous learning courses to ensure that training is provided on topics such as ethics, performance-based contracting, strategic sourcing, or others, as needed.
10. Tuition Assistance. Each executive agency must recognize, in its strategic planning and budgeting activities, the importance of developing its acquisition workforce. OMB Circular A-11 provides guidance concerning classification of education and training obligations within budget documentation. To the extent that funding is available, agencies may provide tuition reimbursement at accredited institutions for education, including a full-time course of study leading to a degree, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 4107 (as authorized by section 37(h)(2) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 433(h)(2)), for personnel serving in acquisition positions in the agency.
11. Acquisition Workforce Training Fund. In accordance with section 37(h)(3)(A) of the OFPP Act (41 U.S.C. § 433(h)(3)(A)), as amended by the Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-136), the Administrator of General Services shall establish an acquisition workforce training fund (AWTF) to support the training of the acquisition workforce of the executive agencies other than the DOD. Agencies administering contracts specified in section 37(h)(3)(B) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 433(h)(3)(B)) shall credit 5 percent of the fees collected under these contracts to the AWTF at the end of each quarter of the fiscal year and in accordance with the instructions issued by the Administrator of General Services. The fund shall be managed by FAI in accordance with section 37(h)(3)(A) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. §433(h)(3)(A)). OFPP and the FAI Board of Directors (see paragraph 13(b)) shall provide direction to FAI on the allocation of these resources to ensure equitable training opportunities for all civilian agencies.
The AWTF supplements, but does not replace, existing agency training budgets, and agencies should continue to budget separately for the training and education of their acquisition workforce. In accordance with section 37(h)(1)(A) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 433 (h)(1)(A)), agency heads shall set forth separately the funding levels requested for education and training of the acquisition workforce in the agency’s annual budget request to OMB.
12. Management Information Systems. In accordance with section 37(d) of the OFPP Act, as amended, (41 U.S.C. § 433(d)) each executive agency must collect, maintain, and utilize information to ensure effective management of the acquisition workforce. FAI maintains an acquisition career management information system (ACMIS) that can assist agencies in managing their workforce and help members of the workforce manage their individual education, training, and experience information. Civilian agencies may populate ACMIS through existing agency learning management systems or may populate ACMIS directly. However, all civilian agencies shall ensure that ACMIS has complete and current information on the members of the acquisition workforce as described below.
Not later than October 1, 2006, each civilian agency shall have complete, current records in ACMIS for, at a minimum, the following:
Not later than April 1, 2007, each civilian agency shall have complete, current records in ACMIS for program and project managers, including CORs and COTRs, who have been identified by the CAO as members of the acquisition workforce. Information on employees in other acquisition-related disciplines can be entered, as appropriate, but not later than one year after the certification program for that discipline has been developed.
The Enterprise Human Resources Integration (EHRI), developed by OPM to manage human resources information government-wide, will work in concert with ACMIS by providing general workforce data and information. ACMIS will use the EHRI information, agency learning management systems information, if applicable, and additional information provided by employees and supervisors to capture more specific data on the acquisition workforce. Additionally, ACMIS will provide detailed reports to assist agencies in short- and long-term workforce planning.
As soon as practicable, FAI will prepare guidance for agencies on ACMIS implementation.
13. The Federal Acquisition Institute.
a. Roles and Responsibilities – FAI fosters and promotes the development of a professional acquisition workforce and is responsible for performing a wide range of activities supporting management of the acquisition workforce as directed by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, pursuant to section 6(d)(5) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 405(d)(5)). To support the management of the workforce in accordance with this Letter, FAI shall focus on the following priorities:
b. FAI Board of Directors - In FY 2004, OFPP established a Board of Directors to assist FAI in its efforts to support the acquisition workforce. The Board provides general direction to FAI to ensure fulfillment of FAI’s statutory requirements and the requirements of this Letter.
The Board, which reports to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, makes recommendations to OFPP regarding the development and execution of FAI’s annual budget. The Board also provides general direction to FAI on the allocation of AWTF resources, in accordance with the priorities of the acquisition community. The Board’s charter can be found on http://www.whitehouse.gov/goodbye/a845c611abc06095342e223bee6b9abdde233699.html.
14. Information Contact. Questions regarding this Policy Letter should be directed to Lesley A. Field, Office of Federal Procurement Policy (lfield@omb.eop.gov), or call (202) 395-7579.
15. Judicial Review. This Policy Letter is not intended to provide a constitutional or statutory interpretation of any kind and it is not intended, and should not be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any persons. It is intended only to provide policy guidance to agencies in the exercise of their discretion concerning federal contracting. Thus, this Policy Letter is not intended, and should not be construed, to create any substantive or procedural basis on which to challenge any agency action or inaction on the ground that such action or inaction was not in accordance with this Policy Letter.
16. Effective Date. This Policy Letter is effective April 15, 2005.
David H. Safavian Administration
APPENDIX C
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
FOR MANAGEMENT
January 20, 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS AND SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVES
FROM: Clay Johnson III
Deputy Director for Management
SUBJECT: The Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Program
In April 2005, the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) published Policy Letter 05-01, Developing and Managing the Acquisition Workforce, which required the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) to develop, and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council (CAOC) to approve, a certification program for contracting professionals in civilian agencies that reflects common standards. The goal of the certification program is to standardize the education, training, and experience requirements for contracting professionals, which will improve workforce competencies and increase career opportunities. The attached Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Program was approved by the CAOC in December 2005.
The program mirrors, as closely as possible, the requirements that the Department of Defense established for its contracting workforce under the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act. The program will be administered by each civilian agency, and FAI will conduct periodic reviews to ensure that the program is being managed consistently. The certification shall be accepted by, at minimum, all civilian agencies as evidence that an employee meets the core education, training, and experience requirements to be a contracting professional (generally the GS-1102 series).
A well-trained acquisition workforce is critical to ensuring that agencies accomplish their mission goals. Investment in the development of the federal acquisition workforce will improve our ability to meet mission needs and continue being effective stewards of taxpayer dollars. If you have questions regarding the implementation of the program, please call Lesley Field on the OFPP staff at (202) 395-7579.
Attachment
cc: Chief Human Capital Officers
Attachment
The Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Program
1. Purpose. The purpose of the Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (FAC-C) program is to establish core requirements for education, training, and experience for contracting professionals in civilian agencies.
2. Authority. This certification program is issued pursuant to section 6(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 405(a)), 6(c)(5) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 405(c)(5)), sections 37(b)(3) and (g) of the OFPP Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. § 433(b)(3) and (g)), and OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, paragraph 8(b).
Based on these authorities, all executive agencies, except those subject to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA), shall accept the FAC-C as evidence that an employee meets the applicable core education, training, and experience requirements for the general schedule (GS)-1102 series.
3. Background. OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 established a requirement for federal acquisition certification programs. Section 8(b) of this Letter required the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) to develop, and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council (CAOC) to approve, a FAC-C program. The FAC-C program was approved by the CAOC in December 2005.
4. Applicability. The FAC-C program applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to DAWIA (10 U.S.C. §§ 1701-64).
The federal certification in contracting is not mandatory for all GS-1102s; however, members of the workforce issued new Contracting Officer (CO) warrants on or after January 1, 2007, regardless of GS series, must be certified at an appropriate level to support their warrant obligations, pursuant to agency policy. New CO warrants are defined in Policy Letter 05-01 as warrants issued to employees for the first time at a department or agency. This requirement does not apply to: • senior level officials responsible for delegating procurement authority; • non-1102s whose warrants are generally used to procure emergency goods and services; or • non-1102s whose warrants are so limited as to be outside the scope of this program, as determined by the Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO).
Agencies have discretion to make additional warranting requirements, and employees should review carefully agency warranting policy. CAOs shall establish agency-specific requirements for tying warrant levels to certification levels based on agency needs. However, agencies are encouraged to require a senior level certification for any employee issued an unlimited Contracting Officer’s warrant on or after January 1, 2007. All agency warranting programs
should be updated to reflect the need for a minimum of 80 continuous learning points every two years (see paragraph 6.e.).
The SPE of a civilian agency may waive the requirement for obtaining a certification for warranting purposes in writing, on a case-by-case basis, if granting a waiver is in the best interest of the agency. This authority may not be delegated, and the use of this authority shall be adequately documented. This waiver is not transferable to another agency.
The certification program is available to all members of the federal acquisition workforce and the volume of requests may be significant when the program begins. For agency planning purposes, priority for consideration will be as follows:
5. Certification Program Oversight and Administration. The FAI Board of Directors, in consultation with FAI, the Interagency Acquisition Career Management Council (IACMC), and other organizations as appropriate, shall provide general program oversight and shall recommend program changes to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy to ensure that the program reflects the needs of all civilian agencies. Changes to the program may be communicated formally through the CAOC or through other means, depending on the significance of the change. FAI shall maintain the most current version of the FAC-C program on its website, www.fai.gov.
FAI shall administer the program through issuance of guidance, processes, and information dissemination, principally through its website. Additionally, FAI shall periodically review agencies’ implementation to ensure that the program remains rigorous and that the standards for certification for education, training, experience, and continuous learning are consistently applied by all civilian agencies.
FAI shall conduct periodic agency audits to validate that the standards for the certification program are being met. Audit checks may include:
The certification process, including verification and assessment of applications, will be managed by each agency. Authority for overseeing the agency FAC-C program, resolving disputes, and granting certifications shall be at the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) level. The SPE may delegate, in writing, certain functions to a level no lower than the Acquisition Career Manager (ACM), as needed, to ensure effective and efficient management of the program. The SPE may not delegate the waiver function as defined in the GS-1102 Qualification Standard.
The ACM, appointed by the CAO under Policy Letter 05-01, or designee, is responsible for administering the agency certification program, including developing a communications strategy, in accordance with this and any subsequent guidance provided by OFPP or FAI. The ACM shall also serve on the Interagency Acquisition Career Management Committee (IACMC), which is run by FAI, to ensure that workforce development policies and opportunities meet the needs of the acquisition workforce.
6. General Information on Core Competencies and the FAC-C Requirements for Education, Training, Experience, and Continuous Learning.
a. Competencies - Although DOD and OFPP retain responsibility for managing their respective workforces, the establishment of core competencies will ensure that the acquisition community develops common skills. The objective of the FAC-C is to align the core competencies and training requirements across the acquisition workforce, and the current competencies for the GS-1102 workforce shall be maintained on the FAI website, www.fai.gov. However, these core competencies will periodically be updated, expanded, or otherwise modified to meet the current and future acquisition workforce requirements, and specialized competencies may be developed to support emerging trends in the government’s acquisition practices. OFPP, Dodd, and OPM shall establish a competency management process to ensure that the core competencies remain relevant and current and are integrated into the curriculum, as appropriate.
b. Education - This program does not change the education requirement in the Qualification Standard for Contract Specialist (GS-1102). The civilian (non-DOD) and DOD education requirements for the GS-1102 series differ at grades 5 through 12 (or equivalent). In accordance with the Qualification Standard, available on www.opm.gov, persons in civilian (non-DOD) GS-1102 positions grades 5 through 12 are required to have, from an accredited institution, either 24-semester hours of business related education OR a baccalaureate degree. Persons seeking positions subject to DAWIA must have both 24-semester hours of business related education AND a baccalaureate degree at all grade levels.
Civilian agency employees in GS-1102 positions will be considered to have met the standard, including the education requirement, for positions they occupied on January 1, 2000. FAC-C Appendix 1 provides guidance on the subject areas and types of classes that meet the education requirement, and agencies shall use this guidance to ensure consistent interpretation of the standard. FAI and the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) will make further guidance available on their respective websites, as needed.
Education waivers granted by an agency, in accordance with the Qualification Standard, are not transferable to other agencies and do not satisfy the education requirement for a FAC-C. An
employee must meet the appropriate education requirements to be certified.
c. Training - In accordance with OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, civilian agencies shall follow the training curriculum established by DOD (see paragraph 7). Core courses must be provided by DAU or be considered DAU-equivalent courses. Agencies may require agency-specific training as part of the elective requirements or continuous learning requirements, but additional agency-specific training beyond the training specified under paragraph 7 is not required for certification. Business-related academic courses that are recognized by DAU as equivalent to core courses may be used to meet training requirements for this program.
When DAU modifies its curriculum, it publishes a list of predecessor classes that allows an individual to associate past training with the new requirements. That list is provided in the DAU catalog (www.dau.mil/catalog), and will assist individuals in determining the DAU courses or DAU-equivalent courses that meet these requirements. FAI will make this information available on its website as well.
As agreed to by the employee and supervisor, electives may be any training opportunity related to the employee’s job, those necessary for career development, or those used for cross training. Electives may include no-cost distance learning, assignment-specific courses, or other training opportunities. Employees are encouraged to take courses that add to their knowledge base or enhance existing skills; electives should generally be increasingly more complex throughout an employee’s career progression. There are no DAU equivalency requirements for electives.
d. Experience - The requirements for experience are generally based on the Contract Specialist (GS-1102) Qualification Standard. Experience may be time spent on the job in a contracting related job assignment, either in the private or public sector, that reflects the accumulation of knowledge, skills, and abilities during years of progressively more responsible work assignments.
e. Continuous Learning – To maintain a FAC-C, acquisition professionals are required to earn 80 continuous learning points (CLPs) of skills currency training every two years beginning October 1, 2007. During the transition to the FAC-C program, agencies are encouraged to be flexible on how this requirement is met initially to ensure that employees are given credit for earlier continuous learning activities. ACMs, or designees, shall monitor the continuous learning requirements for employees holding FAC-Cs to ensure they meet this requirement. A FAC-C will expire if the 80 CLPs are not earned every two years, and the SPE, or other appropriate warranting authority, may choose to revoke or modify a warrant if this condition is not met. If the SPE revokes or modifies a warrant, he or she must notify the warrant holder in writing when the revocation or modification is to be effective, providing enough time and sufficient instruction to ensure that no unauthorized obligations are made.
Civilian agencies shall generally follow the guidance provided by Dodd on how CLPs can be earned. DAU equivalency is not required for continuous learning. Agencies are encouraged to use continuous learning opportunities to assist individuals in obtaining core competencies, maintaining critical acquisition skills, and acquiring agency-specific training. Continuous learning activities include, but are not limited to, the following:
FAC-C Appendix 2 provides guidance on earning CLPs and assigning points to various developmental activities. FAI will provide additional guidance, as needed, on its website.
7. FAC-C Requirements for Education, Training, Experience, and Continuous Learning.
a. General - The FAC-C program is based on the DAWIA requirements for certification at the junior, intermediate, and senior levels to reflect the need for an individual to meet increasingly more rigorous standards for education, training, and experience throughout his or her career. Federal certification levels are not directly associated with warrant limits as certification requirements for warrants are determined by each agency. However, agencies are encouraged to require a senior level certification for any employee issued an unlimited CO’s warrant on or after January 1, 2007. Achievement of the FAC-C is based on three requirements: education, training, and experience and the requirements are cumulative, (i.e., a person must meet the requirements of each previous certification level). Maintenance of a FAC-C is a function of continuous learning, which is addressed in paragraph 6.e.
The requirements for the FAC-C are shown below. Agencies may determine that an assignment requires additional training beyond the FAC-C requirements. Many civilian agencies are moving toward implementing new personnel systems that are not based on the general schedule system. However, the education requirements in the Qualification Standard are tied to grade level and are reflected in these requirements.
b. Level I -
1) Education (see also paragraph 6.b) – Baccalaureate degree OR at least 24 semester hours among these disciplines: accounting, law, business,
finance, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, and organization and management.
2) Training –
*CON 100 should be taken by those just entering the acquisition workforce or those new to the government. Employees who are beginning a level I certification program must
take CON 100. Employees pursuing Level II or Level III certifications may consider taking CON 100 as an elective.
c. Level II* -
1) Education (see also paragraph 6.b) – Baccalaureate degree OR at least 24 semester hours among these disciplines: accounting, law, business, finance, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, and organization and management.
2) Training –
3) Experience – 2 years of contracting experience
* DAU is in the process of revising the level II curriculum for FY07. Employees are encouraged to complete CON 202, 204, and 210 training in FY06, if possible, to facilitate the transition to the new curriculum.
d. Level III -
1) Education (see also paragraph 6.b) - Baccalaureate degree AND at least 24 semester hours among these disciplines: accounting, law, business, finance, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, and organization and management.
2) Training -
3) Experience - 4 years of contracting experience
8. Ways to Meet the Requirements
a. Education and Experience – A candidate must meet the education and experience requirements established in the Contract Specialist (GS-1102) Qualification Standard. There are no exceptions to these requirements and candidates must provide evidence of this to the ACM. In accordance with the Qualification Standard, employees in GS-1102 positions will be considered to have met the standard, including the education requirement, for positions they occupied on January 1, 2000. Please see the Qualification Standard on www.opm.gov for specific requirements for the GS-5 through GS-12 level, and for GS-13 and above.
b. Training – A candidate must meet the training requirements by taking DAU training,
DAU-equivalent courses, or through fulfillment.
1) DAU training or DAU-equivalent courses - A full list of the currently required courses and their predecessor courses is available on www.dau.mil/catalog and www.fai.gov. Candidates must provide evidence of satisfactory completion of these courses.
c. DAWIA Certification – A valid, current DAWIA certification in contracting is equivalent to a FAC-C at the same certification level. The employee is responsible for providing the necessary documentation of the DAWIA certification and the appropriate continuous learning history to ensure validity and currency of the DAWIA certification.
9. Application Processes. In consultation with the CAO and other agency stakeholders, the SPE shall establish the agency process for applying for a FAC-C, verifying information, granting the FAC-C, and maintaining currency. At a minimum, an individual meeting the FAC-C requirements shall request certification through their immediate supervisor. The individual is responsible for producing certificates, transcripts, and records that provide evidence that he or she satisfies the requirements for the program. The supervisor should take this opportunity to assess the skills and competencies of the applicant and develop a plan for enhancing or adding to the employee’s competencies, if appropriate. FAI will develop checklists that agencies can use for the FAC-C application process and will make these available on the FAI website.
The certification will be issued at the employing agency, but will represent the achievement of government-wide standards. This decentralized approach will allow for efficiency, especially during the first year of the FAC-C program. Authority to grant the FAC-C shall be at the SPE level and may be delegated no lower than the ACM (see paragraph 5 above). The ACM is responsible for ensuring that certification applications are available for audit purposes.
10. Acquisition Career Management Information System (ACMIS). ACMIS will be the official system of records for the FAC-C program for all civilian agencies and will support the application process. However, agencies must maintain supplemental records for quality assurance (e.g., copies of course certificates, etc.). FAI is responsible for managing ACMIS and will issue guidance, as necessary, to support ACMIS implementation.
11. Information Contact. Questions regarding this program should be directed to Lesley A. Field, Office of Federal Procurement Policy (lfield@omb.eop.gov ), or call (202) 395-7579.
12. Effective Date. This program is effective January 20, 2006.
FAC-C APPENDIX 1
Guidance on Meeting the Business Course Requirements for the
Contract Specialist (GS-1102) Qualification Standard
Below are types of courses that generally satisfy the Qualification Standard requirement for 24-semester hours (or equivalent) of study from an accredited institution of higher education in any of the following disciplines: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management. Additional information about accreditation can be found on: ope.ed.gov/accreditation.
The following is based on guidance provided by the Defense Acquisition University to the defense workforce and lists subject areas identified by the American Council on Education for each of the business disciplines listed above. Although not an exhaustive list, this guidance should be used by civilian agencies to determine if certain courses provide enough business instruction to count toward the 24-semester hour business requirement. ACMs should work with their human resources departments to ensure a consistent interpretation of which types of courses should count toward the requirement.
BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT DISCIPLINE |
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION SUBJECT AREA |
Accounting
Business Finance
Contracts
Economics
Industrial Management
Law
Organization and Management
Purchasing
Quantitative Methods
|
Cost Accounting Standards
Business Communications Business and Personnel Business Statistics Financial Cost Management Financial Planning and Analysis Inventory Management Resource Planning Risk Analysis
Acquisition Contracting Acquisition Management Business Communications in Contracting Writing Business Contract Law Contract Administration Contract Law Contract Management Contract Pricing and Negotiation Contracting Management Cost & Price Analysis Government Contracting Government Contract Law Procurement Procurement and Contracting Procurement Management
Cost and Price Analysis Cost Analysis Economic Analysis Economic Principles and Decision Making Economics and Financial Management Economics
Automated Systems in Logistics Management Civil Engineering Management Environmental Management Engineering and Analysis Logistics Management Manufacturing Management Material Acquisition Process & Support Systems Property Disposal Management Supply Management Systems Engineering Technology Warehousing Operations
Commercial or Business Contracts Contract Law
Business Administration Advanced Management (Math) Business Business Management Business and Personnel Management Computer Programming Computer Programming & Systems Development Computer Sciences, Data Processing Data Entry and Automated Systems Input General Management Human Resource Development Leadership and Group Decision Process Management Science Management & Leadership Managerial Analysis Manpower Management Materiel Management Methods of Adult Education Organizational Behavior Personnel Administration Principles of Management Quality and Reliability Assurance Research and Development Management Strategic Management Survey of Program Operations
Basic Purchasing
Business Statistics Computer Science Decision Risk Analysis Operations Research Probability Statistics Quantitative Analysis Statistics
|
FAC-C APPENDIX 2
Guidance on Meeting Continuous Learning Points Requirements
These guidelines are generally based on DOD’s requirements for achieving continuous learning points (CLPs). Agencies have flexibility in assigning points and ACMs and/or supervisors, as appropriate, should work with employees to identify appropriate opportunities. Below is guidance on how training, professional activities, education, and experience can be used to meet the CLP requirements. All activities must be job-related.
A. Training
1) Completing awareness training. Periodically agencies conduct briefing sessions to acquaint the workforce with new or changed policy. Generally, no testing or assessment of knowledge gained is required.
2) Completing learning modules and training courses. These may be formal or informal offerings from a recognized training organization, including in-house training course/sessions, which include some form of testing/assessment for knowledge gained.
3) Performing Self-Directed Study. An individual can keep current or enhance his or her capabilities through a self-directed study program agreed to by the supervisor.
4) Teaching. Employees are encouraged to share their knowledge and insights with others through teaching of courses or learning modules. Teaching is also a part of the Professional Activities category.
5) Mentoring. Helping others to learn and become more productive workers or managers benefits the agency and the individuals involved. Mentoring is also a part of the experience category.
B. Professional Activities
1) Participating in Organization Management. Membership alone in a professional organization will not be considered as fulfilling continuous learning requirements, but participation in the organization leadership will. This includes holding elected/appointed positions, committee leadership roles, or running an activity for an organization that you are permitted to join under current ethics law and regulation. The employee must first ensure that participating in the management of an organization is allowed by the agency.
2) Attending/Speaking/Presenting at Professional Seminars/Symposia/Conferences. Employees can receive points for attending professional seminars or conferences that are job related. However, the supervisor needs to determine that the individual learned something meaningful from the experience. Because significant effort is involved in preparing and delivering presentations, credit should be given for each hour invested in the preparation and presentation.
3) Publishing. Writing articles related to acquisition for publication generally meets the criteria for continuous learning. Points will be awarded only in the year published. Compliance with
agency publication policy is required.
4) Participating in Workshops. Points should be awarded for workshops with planned learning outcomes.
C. Education
1) Formal training. ACMs and supervisors should use Continuing Education Units (CEUs) as a guide for assigning points for formal training programs that award CEUs. The CEUs can be converted to points at 10 CLP points per CEU.
2) Formal academic programs. For formal academic programs offered by educational institutions, each semester hour is equal to one CEU. A three-hour credit course would be worth three CEUs and 30 CLP points, assuming that it is applicable to the acquisition function.
CREDITABLE ACTIVITIES |
POINT CREDIT (see note) |
|
|
Academic Courses: |
|
Quarter Hour |
10 per Quarter Hour |
Semester Hour |
10 per Semester Hour |
Continuing Education Unit (CEU) |
10 per CEU |
Equivalency Exams |
Same points as awarded for the course |
Training Courses/Modules: |
|
DAU Courses |
10 per CEU (see DAU catalog) or: |
|
|
Other Functional Training |
1 point per hour of instruction |
Leadership or Other Training |
1 point per hour of instruction |
Equivalency Exams |
Same points as awarded for the course |
Professional Activities: |
|
Professional Exam/License/Certificate |
10-30 points |
Teaching/Lecturing |
2 points per hour; maximum of 20 points per year |
Symposia/Conference Presentation |
2 points per hour; maximum of 20 points per year |
Workshop Participation |
1 point per hour; maximum of 8 points per day and 20 points per year |
Symposia/Conference Attendance |
.5 point per hour; maximum of 4 points per day and 20 points per year |
Publications |
10 to 40 points |
Note- All activities may earn points only in the year accomplished, awarded or publishes.
D. Experience
Experience includes on-the-job experiential assignments, and intra/interorganizational rotational career broadening and developmental experiences. While agencies can use discretion in arriving at a reasonable point value to be awarded for rotational and developmental assignments, a sliding scale is recommended. Suggested points for such assignments are in the table below.
The assumption is that longer assignments are more beneficial than shorter assignments.
The supervisor may feel that an individual may deserve more or less than the value
shown. In determining the points for a rotational/developmental assignment, the
supervisor should consider both the long-term benefit to the agency, and the immediate
benefit to the supervisor’s organization and the workforce member. For example, a second rotational assignment of the same sort would be less valuable than a different type of rotational assignment.
CREDITABLE ACTIVITIES |
POINT CREDIT |
Experience: |
|
On-the-job Experiential Assignment |
Maximum of 20 points per year |
Integrated Product Team (IPT)/ Special Project Leader |
Maximum of 15 points per year |
IPT/ Special Project Member |
Maximum of 10 points per years |
Mentor |
Maximum of 5 points per year |
Assignment Length (Rotational Assignments of Training with Industry): |
Recommended Points: |
12 Months |
80 |
9 Months |
60 |
6 Months |
40 |
3 Months |
15 |
2 Months |
10 |
1 Month |
5 |
Contracting Officer Warrant Authority For GS-1102/GS-1105 Personnel, Contracting Officers, and Heads of the Contracting Activity Designee APPENDIX D
|
||||||
Level |
MinimumProcurement Experience/Series |
Contract Duties % |
Minimum Education |
Minimum Training |
Continuous Learning Points |
Maximum PO/DO Warrant Authority |
Level IA |
1 Year Proc. Exp. Any Job Series |
25% |
High School |
Must include a Simplified Acquisition Course or equivalent (60 hours) |
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $10,000 |
Level IB
|
2 Years Proc Exp. Any Job Series |
50%
|
High School |
Contract and Purchase Related Courses (100 hours) |
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $25,000 |
Level IC |
4 Years Proc. Exp. GS-1102 and GS-1105 |
90% |
High School |
FAC-C Level I Training |
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $100,000 on Purchase Orders $300,000 on Delivery Orders |
Head of the Contracting Activity Designee |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
160 hours of contract training |
40 Hours of contract training every two years |
Unlimited |
|
CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT AUTHORITY FOR GS-1102 PERSONNEL APPENDIX E
|
||||||
Level and Minimum Grade |
Minimum Procurement Expérience |
Contract Duties (%) |
Minimum Education |
Minimum Training/OJT
|
Continuous Learning Points |
Warrant Authority |
Level IIA (GS-1102/11) |
4 Years |
90% |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business |
FAC-C LEVEL II |
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $500,000 |
Level IIB (GS-1102/11) |
6 Years |
90% |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business |
FAC-C LEVEL II
|
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $1,000,000 |
Level IIIA (GS-1102/11) |
7 Years |
90% |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business |
FAC-C LEVEL III
|
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $5,000,000 |
Level IIIB (GS-1102/11) |
9 Years |
90% |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business |
FAC-C LEVEL III
|
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to $25,000,000 |
Level IIIC (GS-1102/11) |
10 Years |
90% |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading to a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business |
FAC-C LEVEL III
|
80 CLPs every two years |
Up to an Unlimited Amount |
|
Education and Training for GS-1102 Personnel APPENDIX F
|
|||
GS-1102 Grade Level |
Education |
Minimum Training/OJT During Grade Levels |
Continuous Learning Points
|
GS – 5 through 9 |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business AND Specialized experience as outlined in the GS-1102 Qualification Standard |
FAC-C Level I
|
80 CLPs every two years |
GS – 10 through 12 |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field OR At least 24 semester hours in business AND Specialized experience as outlined in the GS-1102 Qualification Standard |
FAC-C Level II
|
80 CLPs every two years |
GS – 13 and above |
Mandatory 4-year course of study leading a bachelor’s degree with a major in any field AND At least 24 semester hours in business AND Specialized experience as outlined in the GS-1102 Qualification Standard |
FAC-C Level III (See Paragraph 12 for Exception)
|
80 CLPs every two years |
Requirements outside of OPM’s GS1102 Qualification Standard are subject to revision by the CAO or SPE.
|
Training for COR/COTRs or Equivalent Positions APPENDIX G
|
||||
Level |
Experience |
Competencies |
Minimum Training Hours |
Continuous Learning Points |
Level I |
None |
Basic COR Course that includes the Federal Acquisition Process |
40 |
40 CLPs Every two Years |
Level II |
One year as a Level I COR
|
As outlined in the FAC-COTR Program Guidance |
80 |
40 CLPs Every two Years
|
Level III |
One year as a Level II COR
|
As outlined in the FAC-COTR Program Guidance |
120 |
40 CLPs Every two Years
|
|
APPENDIX H
CONTRACTING OFFICER QUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Use a similar format with the following information:
Last/Middle/ First Name:
Title, Series, Grade:
Agency/Office/Organizational Identification Number (four-digit code):
Office Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:
American Citizen: [ ] Yes [ ] No
Experience: (Begin with your current position and work back until you have demonstrated the required relevant work experience). Information on each position should include:
Name of Employer
Dates Employed
Title of Position
Kind of Business/Organization
Description of Work
Percent of Time Spent on Contract Duties
Current Acquisition Career Specialties (e.g., Policy, IT, Construction, A/E, General, SAP)
FAC-C certified ____ Yes ____No_____ (If yes, attach a copy of the FAC-C certificate)
Are you presently a warranted Contracting Officer? No_____ Yes_____ If yes, provide Warrant Level_______
Continuous Learning Period: ________________
Education: (Highest Level Completed):
Dates Attended
Diploma Received
Years Completed
No. of Semester/Quarter Hour Credits Completed
Type and Year of Degree
Major Field of Study
Other relevant special qualifications, certifications (e.g., CPCM, CFCM, CCCM, CACM, SAS, etc.)
I have at least 24 Semester Hours in a combination of the following fields: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organizational and management.
Yes ____ No ____ (You must provide a list of courses and the number of semester hours for each course if you do not have a Bachelors or Masters Degree in one of the previously listed fields)
Procurement Related Training: (If applicable, attach a copy of your ACMIS printout or equivalent)
Name of Course
Dates Attended
Training Mode (e.g., tests, classroom, waiver, etc.)
Name of School/Vendor
Number of Training Hours Per Course
APPENDIX I
CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE QUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Use a format similar to this with the following information:
Last/Middle/ First Name:
Title, Series, Grade:
Agency/Office/Organizational Identification Number (four-digit code):
Office Address:
American Citizen: [ ] Yes [ ] No
Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:
COR Experience:
Information on each position should include :(Begin with your current position and work back until you have demonstrated the required relevant work experience).
Name of Employer
Dates Employed
Title of Position
Description of Work
Percent of Time Spent on COR Duties
Type of Acquisition Project (e.g., Policy, IT, Construction, A/E, General, SAP)
Education:
High School: Yes_____ No_____
College: Yes_____ No_____ Graduated Yes_____ No_____
Graduate School Yes_____ No_____ Graduated Yes_____ No_____
Major Field of Study: _____________________________________________
Procurement Related Training: (Attach a copy of your ACMIS printout or equivalent)
Name of Course
Dates Attended
Training Mode (e.g., tests, classroom, waiver, etc.)
Name of School/Vendor
Number of Training Hours Per Course
APPENDIX J
1. There is a clear and convincing need to appoint a contracting officer at Level ______ for the following reasons:
2. The Contracting Officer candidate is:
____________________________________________________________________
(Name, Title, Series, and Grade)
3. Work location:
____________________________________________________________________ (Office/Branch/Division/City/State)
4. The candidate meets established qualification standards.
5. If required, the candidate's current conflict of interest disclosure statement and OGE 450 reports are on file in the appropriate personnel office. _____ Yes _____ No
6. A copy of the candidate's qualification statement is attached
7. In addition to Procurement Laws, Regulations, and other applicable requirements, the following warrant limitations are requested:
Dollar Thresholds:
a. Supplies and Services: ___________________________________________
b Construction, A/E: ______________________________________________
c. Delivery Orders: ________________________________________________
d Other Limitations: ______________________________________________
8. Is the candidate FAC-C certified: ____ Yes ____No (If yes, attach a copy of the FAC-C certificate)
FAC-C trained: ___ Yes ___ No
FAC-C Level: _____ FAC-C Application Attached _____ Yes _____ No
I hereby certify that the above information, including any attachment, is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Nominating Officer:
______________________________________________________________________
(Signature)
_______________________________________________________________________
(Typed Name, Title, and Agency) (Date)
APPENDIX K
USDA Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting Application Format
PART A – EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
Organizational /Address
Title, Series, Grade
Date Submitted:
PART B – CERTIFICATION REQUESTED
Certification Level Requested
[ ] FAC-C Level I [ ] FAC-C Level II [ ] FAC-C Level III
PART C – PREVIOUSLY HELD CERTIFICATION FROM
Name of Agency:
Date Certification Issued:
(Attach a copy of the certification including confirmation of last 80 CLPs)
PART D – CERTIFICATION ANALYSIS
Applicable Standard How Met & Verified
[ ] Experience _______________________________________________________________________ (SF-171, SF 50s, previous certification resume OF 612, etc.)
[ ] Education (Major)
_______________________________________________________________________ (Copy of Degree, Previous certification, etc.)
[ ] 24 Sem. Hrs of Bus.
_____________________________________________________________________
(Degree, College transcripts if other than a Business Degree, previous certification SF 171, OF 612)
[ ] Training
_____________________________________________________________________ (Course certificates and transcripts for documenting FAC-C Level requested only)
[ ] Mandatory training documented in ACMIS?
[ ] Waiver (If applicable attach copy of waiver)
PART E – SIGNATURES
Applicant’s signature _______________________________ Date: ________________
Supervisor or requesting official’s signature _________________ Date: _____________
Print Name ___________________________________________
Agency FAC-C approving official’s signature: _______________Date: _____________
Print Name ____________________________________________
PART F - USDA CERTIFICATION DECISION (for Departmental use only)
Recommend Certification [ ] Approval [ ] Disapproval
_________________________________________________Date: ________________
USDA Acquisition Career Manager or other authorized official
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE FAC-C PROGRAM
FILL IN APPLICATION SHEET AS FOLLOWS:
PART A - EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
PART B - CERTIFICATION REQUESTED
Place an “X” in box next to level you are requesting.
PART C – PREVIOUSLY HELD CERTIFICATION FROM ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY
Employees holding certifications from other Federal agencies are not required to complete Part C. To verify the possession of a current certification, applicants shall provide evidence for their last continuous learning period.
PART D - CERTIFICATION ANALYSIS
Check each applicable box and describe the type of documentation you are providing as confirmation:
Experience - Attach documents detailing contracting experience. Acceptable documentation includes SF-50s (showing beginning and ending dates served in qualifying positions), SF-171/OF617, or a resume with a description of the contracting work performed.
Education - Attach a copy of degree. Specify if it is a business degree.
24 Semester Hours of Business - College transcript if providing other than a Business Degree to verify Education above (List of College Courses and Certificate of Scholastic Achievement) or an SF-171/OF-617 showing college courses completed.
Training - Attach verification of successful completion of FAC-C training. Acceptable documentation includes copies of course certificates, an official FAI or ACMIS training transcript, fulfillment of mandatory training record, or other acceptable documentation as noted by OPPM/PPD. Provide mandatory course numbers for all mandatory and equivalent, fulfillment, or predecessor courses.
Waiver: Attach a copy of any waivers granted (i.e. education, 24 business hours, procurement training, or experience).
PART E - SIGNATURES
Three signatures are required. Applicant shall sign on line one. Your supervisor or other authorized official shall sign Part E, line two. The agency approving official, which is generally the ACM or other official as designated by the contracting activity, shall approve the request by signing on line three. The Agency ACM shall review all certification requests prior to approval of the
FAC-C request and submission to the Department. Applicants shall submit their application packages to the office designated by the contracting activity.
PART F – USDA CERTIFICATION DECISION
The USDA ACM will review each FAC-C application and recommend SPE
approval/disapproval of the FAC-C request.
SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION TO OPPM/PPD
The FAC-C package must contain the following:
Mail package to USDA/OPPM/PPD, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Stop 9303, Washington, DC 20250.
FOR QUESTIONS, Contact your Agency ACM or the USDA’s ACM at linda.persons@usda.gov.
APPENDIX L
FEDERAL ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION IN CONTRACTING CHECKLIST
Level I
Level II
methods, and organization and management
* Electives must be at least 16 CLPs
2. EXPERIENCE
3. TRAINING
Level III
a. [ ] 4 years of contracting experience
b. [ ] (Desired) An additional 4 years of contracting experience
3. TRAINING
a. [ ] CON 353 Advanced Business Solutions for Mission Support
b. [ ] 2 Electives
c. [ ] (Desired) 2 weeks of management and leadership training
April 25, 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS
FROM: Paul A. Denett
Administrator
SUBJECT: The Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers
Well-trained and experienced program and project managers are critical to the acquisition process and the successful accomplishment of mission goals. A strong partnership between program and project managers and contracting professionals requires a common understanding of how to meet the government’s needs through acquisitions that deliver quality goods and services in an effective and efficient manner. This memorandum establishes a structured development program for program and project managers that will improve this partnership and our collective stewardship of taxpayer dollars.
The Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) led an interagency working group to develop common, essential competencies for the program and project management community. The attached Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) reflects these recommendations and applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act. The certification shall be accepted by, at minimum, all civilian agencies as evidence that an employee meets the core training and experience requirements.
The certification is required for program and project managers that are assigned to major acquisitions as defined in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Part 7, exhibit 300, Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition, and Management of Capital Assets. The attached provides more details on transition time, waivers, and the responsibilities of the Chief Acquisition Officer in implementing the policy. Program and project managers assigned to information technology (IT) investments must also meet the technical requirements of the Federal IT Project Manager Guidance Matrix.
The program will be administered by each civilian agency, and FAI will conduct periodic reviews to ensure that the FAC-P/PM program is being managed consistently. Additionally, FAI is mapping the program and project management competencies, which are included in the attachment, to learning objectives that will be used to assess current training or develop new training to meet these requirements. Private vendors, the Defense Acquisition University, and other government agencies offer a variety of online and classroom courses that address many of these competencies. FAI plans to offer additional training in the first quarter of FY 2008.
A well-trained acquisition workforce is necessary to ensure that agencies accomplish their mission goals effectively and responsibly. Skilled program and project managers are critical in developing accurate government requirements, defining measurable performance standards, and managing contractor activities to ensure that intended outcomes are achieved.
If you have questions regarding the implementation of the program, please call Lesley Field on the OFPP staff at (202) 395-7579, or Karen Pica, Director of the Federal Acquisition Institute, at (703) 805-2333.
Attachment
cc: Chief Information Officers
Chief Human Capital Officers
Senior Procurement Executives
Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM)
3. Background. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003, P.L. 108-136, expanded the definition of acquisition to include functions performed by program and project managers, such as requirements development, performance management, and technical direction. OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 built upon this broader definition of acquisition workforce and required FAI to make recommendations for a program and project management certification program. FAI partnered with twenty federal agencies to recommend the competencies and framework for this program. A report on the working group’s efforts is available at http://www.fai.gov/policies/sturep.asp.
4. Applicability. This policy applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA, 10 U.S.C. §§ 1741-46). The broader definition of the acquisition function, in accordance with the Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA, P.L. 108-136) and further defined by OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, includes program and project management. The similarities and distinctions between program and project management are discussed in FAC-P/PM Appendix 4. The certification shall be accepted by, at a minimum, all civilian agencies as evidence that an employee meets core training and experience requirements for general program and project management.
The Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO), in consultation with appropriate agency officials, is responsible for developing workforce policies that apply the FAC-P/PM requirements as necessary to ensure agency program and project managers have essential program and project management competencies. The competency-based model serves as a foundation allowing agencies to build on these requirements or modify existing programs. Agencies may require additional management and technical competencies for particular functional areas, agency programs, or program assignments. The CAO may give implementation authority to other functional managers, such as the Chief Information Officer (CIO) or Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to ensure the FAC-P/PM requirements are implemented appropriately.
The FAC-P/PM is not mandatory for all program and project managers; however, at a minimum, program and project managers assigned to programs considered major acquisitions must be senior-level certified unless a waiver is granted by the appropriate agency official (see paragraph
below). The target completion date for this certification is one year from the date of assignment to the program or project. Major acquisitions are defined in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Part 7, exhibit 300, Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition, and Management of Capital Assets. OMB may work with an agency to declare other investments as major investments, and agencies should consult with the appropriate agency personnel about what investments to consider major.
The CAO, or designated functional manager, may waive all or part of the FAC-P/PM requirements in writing, on a case-by-case basis, if granting the waiver is in the best interest of the agency. This authority shall be used only when necessary, the written justification shall include reasons for and conditions of the waiver, and agency Acquisition Career Managers (ACMs) must maintain all supporting documentation to confirm information entered into the Acquisition Career Management Information System (ACMIS – see paragraph 8) and for program quality assurance. Waivers are not needed for the first year following assignment to a major acquisition, in accordance with the paragraph above. However, waivers for additional time beyond that year shall be granted for no more than an additional year. If time is necessary beyond this, the CAO must concur with any extensions.
Program and project managers assigned to information technology (IT) investments must also meet the requirements of the Federal IT Project Manager Guidance Matrix found (see www.cio.gov/documents/Federal%20IT%20PM%20Guidance%20Matrix2.ppt). This matrix references additional Office of Personnel Management guidance for IT project managers (see www.opm.gov/fedclass/cg03-0001.pdf). The FAC-P/PM generally mirrors the program and project management competencies and experience standards found in the matrix. However, the FAC-P/PM does not include the technical standards found in the IT PM guidance. Individuals certified under the FAC-P/PM program can be considered to meet the general PM competencies and suggested experience standards of the IT PM qualification guidance for purposes of identifying qualified project managers, but must also meet the technical standards to satisfy fully the IT PM requirements.
When identifying individuals to be certified under this program and other applicability requirements, the CAO shall review the guidance provided in OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 and obtain concurrence from the CIOs, CFOs, Chief Human Capital Officers (CHCOs), or others as appropriate. At a minimum, agencies should consider applying the FAC-P/PM requirements to the following:
The certification is not intended to confer qualification for assignment as a program or project manager within an agency, as the assignment of personnel is an agency-specific function, but provides a structured approach to developing program and project managers.
5. Certification Program Oversight and Administration. The FAI Board of Directors, in consultation with FAI, the Interagency Acquisition Career Management Council (IACMC), the Chief Acquisition Officers Council (CAOC), the CIOC Council IT Workforce Committee, and other organizations as appropriate, shall provide general program oversight and shall recommend program changes to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy to ensure the program reflects the needs of all civilian agencies. Changes to the program may be communicated formally through the CAOC and other councils or through other means depending on the significance of the change. FAI shall maintain the most current version of the FAC-P/PM on www.fai.gov.
FAI will administer the program through issuance of guidance and dissemination of information, principally through its Web site. Upon agency request, FAI will review existing agency programs against the requirements contained in this document to identify the extent to which an agency’s certification program meets the FAC-P/PM guidelines. In addition, FAI will periodically review agencies’ implementation of this guidance to ensure the program remains rigorous and the standards for certification for training, experience and continuous learning are consistently applied by all civilian agencies.
Essential FAI responsibilities for program administration are included below:
The certification process, including assessment of applications, will be managed by each agency. The agency Acquisition Career Manager (ACM) appointed by the CAO under Policy Letter 05-01, or designee, is responsible for administering the agency certification program, in accordance with this guidance and any subsequent guidance provided by OFPP or FAI. Authority for overseeing the agency FAC-P/PM program, resolving disputes, and granting certifications will be at the CAO or designee level. The CAO may delegate, in writing, certain functional responsibilities as needed to ensure effective and efficient management of this program within an gency.
a
Essti
6. General Information on Essential Competenci
Training, Experience, and Continuous Learning. a. General – Unlike the Federal Acquisition in Contracting (FAC-C) program, which p
a
considered essential for successful program and project management. Certification under the FAC-P/PM is based on attaining these competencies and having a certain number of years of experience associated with each of three levels. Additionally, 80 hours of continuous learning isrequired every two years to ensure currency. The competencies and experience are cumulative across levels. While a specific curriculum is not articulated, training plans are available at FACP/PM Ap
An applicant can satisfy the competency requirements through successful completsuggested training, completion of comparable education or certification programs, or demonstration of knowledge, skills, and abilities. Additional guidan
FAI has developed a Program/Project Manager training blueprint that associates the competencies in FAC-P/PM Appendix 2 with learning outcomes. This document is locatwww.fai.gov. The blueprint can be used to compare existing or planned training and/or certification programs to the FAC-P/PM. The blueprint can also be used by individuals to identify areas where training has al
eet FAC-P/PM req
Competencies (see FAC-P/PM Appendix 2 for complete list) – The establishment ofcore competencies ensures the program and project management community develops common, basic skills. The competencies in FAC-P/PM Appendix 2 were developed byinteragency working group using a competency confirmation process, which involved identifying tasks, conducting focus groups, rating tasks, and analyzing results. Focusgroup subject matter experts were drawn from various civilian and defense agencies, including the Office of Personnel Management, and the competencies associated with certification program were determined by this group to be essential compete
The objective of the FAC-P/PM is to align a base of essential competencies across the federal government’s acquisition workforce. Some departments will have additional
The current competencies for program and project managers will be maintained the FAI Web site, www.fai.gov. These essential competencies will be updated periodically, expanded, or otherwise modified to meet current and future acquisition workforce requirements and to reflect emerging trends in the government’s acquisitiopractices. FAI, DoD, and OPM will work collaboratively to establish a competency management process to ensure the base core comp
Certification Levels -- FAC-P/PM will recognize three levels of certification—entry/apprentice, mid level/journeyman and senior/expert. A brief explanation of each
investment, the FAC-P/PM will not use I, II, or III to distinguish the levels.) A sample
Entry Level – At this level, program and proj
C
Experience at Entry Level: At least one year of project management experiencewithin the last five years. Project management experience includes experience constructing a work breakdown structure, preparing project analysis documents, tailoring acquisition documents to ensure that quality, effective, efficient systemproducts are delivered, analyzing and/or developing requirements, monitor
p
Training: Training in program and project management at this level should be provided to develop the essential interpersonal and management competencies required of high-performing, successful program and project managers. See FAC-P/PM A
2) Mid-Level/Journeyman – At this level, program and projec
•
Competencies at Mid-Level/Journeyman: See FAC-P/PM Appendix 2 Experience at Mid-Level/Journeyman: At least two years of program or project management experience within the last five years that includes experience at the entrlevel as well as experience performing market research, developing documents forrisk and opportunity management, developing and applying technical processes andtechnical management processes, performing or participating in source selection, preparing ac
, writing a business case, and strategic
planning. Training: It is highly recommended that interactive training in these areas be designed to develop the essential interpersonal and management competencies required of high-performing, successful program and project managers such as team building, influencing/negotia
competencies at this level.
3
•
relates to acquisition investments
Competencies at Senior/Expert Level: See FAC-P/PM Appendix 2 Experience at Senior/Expert Level: At least five years of program and project management experience at the federal level, including managing and evaluating
a
strategic planni
Training: It is highly recommended that interactive training in these areas be designed to develop the essential interpersonal and management competencies required of high-performing, successful program and project managers such as strategic thinking, vision, and external awareness. See FAC-P/PM Ap
Continuous Learning – To maintain a FAC-P/PM, certified professionals are requireearn 80 continuous learning points (CLPs) of skills currency training every two years beginning the first fiscal year following the effective date of this memorandum. CLPs begin to accumulate on the date the individual is certified. For further information onCLPs, refer to FAC-P/PM Appendix 3. Individuals are responsible for maintaining continuous learning records and agency ACMs, or their designees, will mo
Continuous learning activities related
• experien
rovide additional guid
e. Certification by a recognized organization: Civilian agencies will follow the determinations made by FAI, which will consider the determinations made by DoD, as to which certifications by organizations outside the federal government are eligible for full or
8. Acquisition Career Management Information System (ACMIS). For all civilian agenACMIS will be the official system of records for the FAC-P/PM program and will include waiver information, as necessary (see paragraph 4). Agencies and individuals are responsiblmaintaining supporting certification documentation for quality assurance purposes. FAI is responsible for managing ACMIS and will issue guidance, as necessary, to support ACMIS implementation. Agencies are encouraged to begin entering or migrating data on designaprogram and project managers as soon as practicable but no later than July 1, 2007 or
o
FAC-P/PM Appendices
1 Training Plans for the FAC-P/PM
2 Competencies and Proficiencies at Each FAC-P/PM Certification level
3 Guidance on Meeting the Requirements for Continuous Learning Points
4
F
E
Between 24-40 hours of coursework in basic acquisition
•
Between
Between 24-40 hours in Earned Value Management (EVM) and cost estimates that will prepare the individual to:
________________________________________________________________________
Mid Level/Journeyman Training
Between 24-40 hours of coursework in intermediate project management that enables an individual to:
Between 16-24 hours of coursework in employing correct and effective leadership and interpersonal skills to include:
Between 24-40 hours of coursework that is government-specific and prepares the individual to:
Between 24-40 hours in EVM and cost estimates that will prepare the individual to:
________________________________________________________________________
Senior/Expert Level Training
Between 24-40 hours of learning in advanced acquisition management that prepares the individual to:
Between 24-40 hours of instruction in advanced program management to provide skills in:
Between 16-24 hours of coursework in employing correct and effective leadership and interpersonal skills to include:
Between 24-40 hours of coursework that is government-specific and prepares the individual to:
Between 24-40 hours in EVM and cost estimates that will prepare the individual to:
FAC-P/PM APPENDIX 2 Essential Competencies and Proficiencies for each Certification Level
This FAC-P/PM Appendix provides the essential competencies and levels of proficiency for the FAC-P/PM. As an individual gains experience, the proficiency level evolves from recognition and awareness of concepts at the entry level to the management and evaluation of their application at the senior level. Additionally, the individual is expected to obtain increasingly more complex leadership competencies.
Entry/Apprentice Level |
Requirements Development and Management Processes – Recognition of government-wide and agency-specific investment management requirements, acquisition policies, and program management strategies that support assigned missions and functions; understanding of how to manage risk; understanding of the many factors that influence cost, schedule, and performance; attention to lessons learned; understanding of metrics needed to manage programs and projects that deliver quality, affordable, supportable, and effective systems/products. Specifically includes recognition of:
|
Systems Engineering – Recognition of the scientific, management, engineering, and technical skills used in the performance of systems planning, research and development, with an emphasis on performing and managing a technical process. |
Test and Evaluation (T&E) – Recognition of efficient and cost effective methods for planning, monitoring, conducting, and evaluating tests of prototype, new, or modified systems equipment or materiel, including the need to develop a thorough T&E strategy to validate system performance through measurable methods that relate directly to requirements and to develop metrics that demonstrate system success or failure. |
Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) – Recognition of performance-based logistic efforts that optimize total system lifecycle availability, supportability, and reliability/maintainability while minimizing cost and logistic footprint, and interoperability. |
Contracting – Recognition of the supervision, leadership and management processes/procedures involving the acquisition of supplies and services, construction, research and development; acquisition planning to include performance-based considerations; cost and price analysis; solicitation and selection of sources; preparation, negotiation, and award of contracts; all phases of contract administration; termination options and processes for closeout of contracts; legislation, policies, regulations, and methods used in contracting, and business and industry practices, with particular emphasis on:
|
Business, Cost Estimating and Financial Management – Recognition of the forms of cost estimating, cost analysis, reconciliation of cost estimates, financial planning, formulating financial programs and budgets, budget analysis/execution, benefit-cost analysis, Earned Value Management (EVM) in accordance with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Electronics Industries Alliance (EIA) Standard for EVM Systems #748-A, and other methods of performance measurement. |
Leadership/Professional – These are the skills, knowledge, abilities and traits acquired through experience, training and education within government and the private sector and are cumulative, leading to skilled supervision and seasoned leadership. These competencies may appear in successive levels to emphasize the process of evolving, developing, and maturing leadership skills.
|
Mid-Level/Journeyman |
Management Processes – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Systems Engineering – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Test and Evaluation (T&E) -- Individuals at this level should be able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) – Individuals at this level able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Contracting – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Business, Cost Estimating & Financial Mgmt – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize and apply the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Leadership/Professional – These competencies, in addition to those listed at entry-level, comprise a foundation for effective mid-level program/project manager-related responsibilities. These competencies may appear in successive levels to emphasize the process of evolving, developing, and maturing leadership skills
|
Senior/Expert Level |
Management Processes – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Systems Engineering – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the application of the scientific, management, engineering, and technical skills used in the performance of systems planning, research and development. |
Test and Evaluation (T&E) – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Contracting – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Business, Cost Estimating & Financial Mgmt – Individuals at this level should be able to recognize, apply, and manage and evaluate the concepts presented at the entry/apprentice level. |
Leadership/Professional -- These are the skills, knowledge, abilities and traits acquired through experience, training and education within government and the private sector and are cumulative, leading to skilled supervision and seasoned leadership. These competencies may appear in successive levels to emphasize the process of evolving, developing, and maturing leadership skills.
|
FAC-P/PM APPENDIX 3 Guidance on Meeting the Requirements for Continuous Learning Points (CLP)
These guidelines reflect best-in-practice recommendations for continuous learning. Agencies retain flexibility and supervisors remain responsible for working with program and project managers to identify those activities and opportunities of greatest benefit to the professional development of an individual. The training, professional activities, education and experience that are used to meet the CLP requirements must be job related.
A. Training
1) Completing awareness training. Periodically agencies conduct briefing sessions to acquaint the workforce with new or changed policy. Generally, no testing or assessment of knowledge gained is required.
2) Completing learning modules and training courses. These may be formal or informal offerings from a recognized training organization, including in-house training courses/sessions, which include some form of testing/assessment for knowledge gained.
3) Performing Self-Directed Study. An individual can keep current or enhance his or her capabilities through a self-directed study program agreed to by the supervisor.
4) Teaching. Employees are encouraged to share their knowledge and insights with others through teaching of courses or learning modules.
5) Mentoring. Helping others to learn and become more productive workers or managers benefits the agency and the individuals involved.
B. Professional Activities
1) Participating in Organization Management. Membership alone in a professional organization will not be considered as fulfilling continuous learning requirements, but participation in the organization leadership will. This includes holding elected/appointed positions, committee leadership roles, or running an activity for an organization that one is permitted to join under current ethics law and regulation. The employee and supervisor must first ensure that participating in the management of an organization is allowed by the agency.
2) Attending/Speaking/Presenting at Professional Seminars/Symposia/Conferences. Employees can receive points for attending professional seminars or conferences that are job related. However, the supervisor needs to determine that the individual learned something meaningful from the experience. Because significant effort is involved in preparing and delivering presentations, credit should be given for each hour invested in the preparation and presentation.
3) Publishing. Writing articles related to acquisition for publication generally meets the criteria for continuous learning. Points will be awarded only in the year published. Compliance with agency publication policy is required.
4) Participating in Workshops. Points should be awarded for workshops with planned learning outcomes.
C. Education
1) Formal training. Supervisors should use Continuing Education Units (CEUs) as a guide for assigning points for formal training programs that award CEUs. The CEUs can be converted to points at 10 CLP points per CEU.
2) Formal academic programs. For formal academic programs offered by educational institutions, each semester hour is equal to one CEU. A three-hour credit course would be worth three CEUs and 30 CLP points, assuming that it is applicable to the acquisition function.
SAMPLE ACTIVITIES |
RECOMMENDED NUMBER OF HOURS |
Active Association Membership (in relevant subject area or program/project management association) |
5 hours for an active membership year OR 1 hour for each 60 minutes of activity attended during the year |
Publication of P/PM/acquisition-related articles, technical papers, etc. |
20 hours for articles 25 for technical paper
|
Formal rotational assignments |
40 hours per assignment |
Conference presentations, training or seminar delivery |
2 hours for 60 minutes of first-time presentation (1 for presentation, 1 for preparation, .5 credit for repeat delivery of same material) |
Team leadership activities, participation on project teams for new products/activities |
1 hour for every 60 minutes of participation |
Formal education |
1 hour for each hour of instruction up to 36 hours for a 3 credit course or American Council on Education (ACE) recommendation |
Professional examination, license, or certification |
40 hours in the year obtained |
1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU) |
10 hours |
1 Continuous Learning Point (CLP), Professional Development Unit (PDU), or Professional Development Hour (PDH) |
1 hour |
1 credit hour (college course or ACE recommendation) |
12 hours |
Conference attendance |
1 hour for each 50 minute presentation attended |
Note - All activities may earn points only in the year accomplished, awarded or published.
D. Experience
Experience includes on-the-job experiential assignments and intra- or inter-organizational rotational career-broadening and developmental experiences. While supervisors and employees must use discretion in arriving at a reasonable point value to be awarded for rotational and developmental assignments, a sliding scale is recommended. Suggested points for such assignments are in the table below.
The assumption is that longer assignments are more beneficial than shorter assignments. The supervisor may feel that an individual may deserve more or less than the values shown. In determining the points for a rotational/developmental assignment, the supervisor should consider both the long-term benefit to the agency and the immediate benefit to the supervisor’s organization and the individual. For example, a second rotational assignment of the same sort would be less valuable than a different type of rotational assignment.
When experience or other activities are to be used to earn CLPs, certain
principles should be followed. Supervisors and employees should pre-define, as closely
as possible, the tasks to be accomplished, expected outcomes, and the learning
opportunities. If it is an assignment, the individual should be mentored during the
assignment. Accomplishment of a product, such as a briefing, a project design, a report,
or other work product that shows the learning attained, is desirable. Sharing the knowledge and experience gained and the product with others in the organization is encouraged.
CREDITABLE ACTIVITIES |
POINT CREDIT |
Experience: |
|
On-the-Job Experiential Assignments |
Maximum of 20 points per year |
Integrated Product Team (IPT)/ Special Project Leader |
Maximum of 15 points per year |
IPT/Special Project Member |
Maximum of 10 points per years |
Mentor |
Maximum of 5 points per year |
Assignment Length (Rotational Assignments or Training with Industry): |
Recommended Points:
|
12 Months |
80 |
9 Months |
60 |
6 Months |
40 |
3 Months |
15 |
2 Months |
10 |
1 Month |
5 |
FAC-P/PM APPENDIX 4 Relationship Between Program Management and Project Management
The relationship between program and project is interdependent, not discrete, and cumulative. Entry level project managers gain experience leading teams, building technical and leadership skills that continue to mature as the nature of assignments becomes more complex. The project manager builds skills and expertise in project management throughout his/her career. Instead of a dividing line between program and project, there is generally an overlap during mid-level assignments.
The FAC-P/PM includes both program and project management within a single certification rather than two separate tracks. These program guidelines are built to reflect both the interdependent nature of program and project management as well as the development needs of a program and project manager. The definitions below shape the discussion.
This is pictorially represented below:
Program management competencies are built into the project management foundation. Some of the core project management competencies are a subset of program management competencies. As project managers develop their project management competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills and abilities), they acquire the important program perspectives. The ability to use sound judgment in both project and program management is critical.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
OFFICE OF FEDERAL OFFICE OF EDERAL
PROCUREMENT POLICY PROCUREMENT POLICY
November 26, 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS
FROM: Paul A. Denett
Administrator
SUBJECT: The Federal Acquisition Certification for Contracting Officer
Technical Representatives
Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs) perform critical acquisition and technical functions, and Contracting Officers rely on them to ensure that contracts are managed properly to meet mission needs. This memorandum establishes a structured training program for COTRs and other individuals performing these functions, including Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs), that standardizes competencies and training across civilian agencies and improves our collective stewardship of taxpayer dollars. The attached Federal Acquisition Certification for COTRs (FAC-COTR) reflects recommendations from an interagency working group led by the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) and applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act.
All COTRs appointed to a contract after the effective date of this policy must be certified no later than six months from their date of appointment and must maintain their skills currency through continuous learning. COTRs who hold delegation letters on active contracts as of the effective date of this policy have generally taken agency-required training. To recognize this earlier training, current COTRs must review their training in accordance with agency policy, ensure that all essential competencies articulated in the attached have been obtained, and be certified no later than 12 months from the effective date of this policy. Any training required to obtain needed competencies can count toward the continuous learning requirement for current COTRs.
The Chief Acquisition Officer of each agency is responsible for the policies and programs necessary to implement this certification program. Upon agency request, FAI will review existing agency programs against the FAC-COTR requirements to facilitate implementation. FAI, the Defense Acquisition University, private vendors, and other government agencies offer a variety of online and classroom courses that address these competencies.
If you have questions regarding the implementation of the program, please call Lesley Field on the OFPP staff at (202) 395-7579, or Karen Pica, Director of the Federal Acquisition Institute, at (703) 805-2333.
Attachment
cc: Chief Information Officers
Chief Human Capital Officers
Senior Procurement Executives
COTR Key Competencies |
|
Professional Business Competencies |
Technical Competencies |
Oral Communication |
* Understanding COTR duties, responsibilities, and obligations |
Decision-Making |
Effective Communication of Contract Requirements |
Teamwork |
Effective Performance Management |
Problem Solving |
Strategic Planning |
Attention to Detail |
Detailed Evaluation Skills |
Reasoning |
Defining Business Relation ships |
Flexibility |
Understanding the Marketplace |
Interpersonal Skills |
Effective Communication |
Self-Mgmt./Initiative |
Defining Government Requirements in Commercial/Non -Commercial Terms |
Integrity/Honesty |
Effective Negotiation Skills and Effective Analytical Skills |
Planning and Evaluating |
|
Influencing/Negotiating |
|
Writing |
|
Project Management |
6. Certification for Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs). The FAC-COTR will consist of competency-based core training and assignment specific training to achieve certification, and ongoing continuous learning to maintain certification. Obtaining the FAC-COTR does not mean that an individual will be assigned as a COTR; the agency shall make this determination in accordance with agency need.
(8 Pages)
Attachment
Federal Acquisition Certification for Contracting Officer
Technical Representatives (FAC-COTR)
1. Purpose. The purpose of the Federal Acquisition Certification for Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (FAC-COTR) is to establish general training requirements for COTRs in civilian agencies. This certification program will promote development of essential, standard acquisition competencies across civilian agencies for COTRs. Under this program, COTRs are required to achieve certain competencies for certification and maintain their certification through continuous learning opportunities.
2. Authority. Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Policy Letter 05-01 established a requirement for federal acquisition certification programs. The FAC-COTR is issued pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 403, et seq and OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, paragraph 9.
3. Background. The quality and effectiveness of the federal acquisition process depend on the development of a capable and competent workforce. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003, P.L. 108-136, expanded the definition of acquisition to include functions performed by COTRs, such as managing and measuring contract performance and providing technical direction. COTRs and Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs) are terms given to individuals who are authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer (CO) to perform prescribed administrative and/or technical functions. For the purposes of this policy, the term COTR includes CORs and other individuals performing these functions.
OFPP Policy Letter 05-01 built upon this broader definition of acquisition workforce and required the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) to develop and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council (CAOC) to approve better standards for training and managing COTRs. An interagency working group chartered to develop the program and project management certification also recommended a separate certification for COTRs.
FAI published a report in 2003 on the competencies necessary for the COTR job function and the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board published a report in 2005 entitled “Contracting Officer Representatives: Managing the Government’s Technical Experts to Achieve Positive Contract Outcomes.” Both reports can be found on www.fai.gov. A common theme in these reports is the need to organize and support the COTR community to ensure that acquisition management is implemented effectively. Examples of their findings and recommendations are as follows:
- COTRs should be formally delegated authority to work on particular contracts
- COTRs should receive adequate training in contracting, their technical area, and general competencies at the right time and in the right way
- the COTR workforce should be strategically managed by identifying COTRs and tracking competencies and skills currency
4. Applicability. The FAC-COTR program applies to all executive agencies, except those subject to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA, 10 U.S.C. §§ 1741-46). The certification shall be accepted by, at a minimum, all civilian agencies as evidence that an employee meets core training requirements to perform COTR functions,
All COTRs appointed to a contract after the effective date of this policy must be certified no later than six months from their date of appointment and must maintain their skills currency through continuous learning. COTRs who hold delegation letters on active contracts as of the effective date of this policy have generally taken agency-required training. To recognize this earlier training, current COTRs must review their training in accordance with agency policy, ensure that all essential competencies have been obtained, and be certified no later than 12 months from the effective date of this policy. Any training required to obtain needed competencies can count toward the continuous learning requirement for current COTRs.
The Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO) may waive, for a period not to exceed 12 months, all or part of the FAC-COTR requirements in writing, on a case-by-case basis, if granting the waiver is in the best interest of the agency. This authority shall be used only when necessary, the written justification shall include reasons for and conditions of the waiver, and the agency’s Acquisition Career Manager (ACM) must maintain all supporting documentation to confirm information entered into the Acquisition Career Management Information System (ACMIS – see paragraph 7) and for program quality assurance.
5. Certification Program Oversight and Administration. The FAI Board of Directors, in consultation with FAI, the Interagency Acquisition Career Management Council (IACMC), the CAOC, and other organizations as appropriate, shall provide general program oversight and shall recommend program changes to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy to ensure the program reflects the needs of all civilian agencies. Changes to the program may be communicated formally through the CAOC or through other means depending on the significance of the change. FAI shall periodically revalidate the competencies and will maintain the most current version of the FAC-COTR on www.fai.gov. FAI will also maintain on its Web site a map of the COTR competencies and training to facilitate implementation.
FAI will administer the program through issuance of guidance and information dissemination, principally through its Web site. Upon agency request, FAI will review existing agency programs against the requirements contained in this document to correlate agency training and/or certification program with this policy.
The CAO, in consultation with other appropriate agency officials, is responsible for developing workforce policies that apply the FAC-COTR requirements, as necessary, to ensure agency COTRs have essential competencies. The certification process, including the assessment of applications, will be managed by each agency. Authority for overseeing the agency’s FAC-COTR program, resolving disputes, and granting certifications will be at the CAO or designee level. The CAO may delegate, in writing, certain functional responsibilities as needed to ensure effective and efficient management
of this program within an agency. The agency ACM appointed by the CAO under OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, or designee, is responsible for administering the agency certification program, in accordance with this guidance and any subsequent guidance provided by OFPP
Competencies for COTRs: The skills and competencies outlined in the table below are based on the COTR competencies report published by FAI in 2003 and are the core competencies on which the certification is built.
Training: COTRs must have a minimum of 40 hours of training and must maintain their skills currency through continuous learning. The training can be obtained through FAI, the Defense Acquisition University, commercially-available sources, colleges or universities, or agency-specific courses. Twenty-two of the required 40 hours of training hours must cover the essential COTR competencies listed above. A suggested training curriculum includes the following courses. Agencies considering substituting other training for these courses must ensure that the curriculum covers all essential competencies.
* These duties are articulated in FAI’s 2003 report. COTRs are reminded that their duties, responsibilities, and obligations are limited to those articulated in their delegation letters and must be exercised in accordance with agency policies.
A
CLC106 – COR with a Mission Focus (8 CLPs)
CLM024 – Contracting Overview (8 CLPs)
CLC004 – Market Research (3 CLPs)
CLC007 – Contract Source Selection (1 CLP)
CLM003 – Ethics Training for Acquisition Technology and Logistics (2 CLPs) or similar
Both the title and course number are provided for reference. These courses can be accessed by registering at www.fai.gov. Individuals who have completed FAI’s 24-hour “COR Mentor” course have satisfied this requirement.
The remaining 18 hours of the required 40 hours of training should include agency-specific courses, electives, and/or those identified by the COTR’s supervisor, in consultation with the Contracting Officer, as necessary, for managing a particular contract. The supervisor should assess the COTR’s previous experience as it relates to the type of contract the COTR will be managing to determine if additional training is needed. Examples could include additional training on services, performance-based acquisition, earned value management, time and materials contracts, green purchasing, socioeconomic issues, etc. Additional classroom and online training is available on the FAI Web site. Supplemental references and resources to further develop COTR skill sets can be found through the COTR online community of practice on the acquisition community connection (acc.dau.mil/cor) and also available through www.fai.gov or www.dau.mil.
Individuals certified as Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (FAC-C) Level I or Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) Mid-Level/Journeyman are considered to have met the FAC-COTR requirements, but must still submit the necessary documents to their ACMs and obtain certification. However, an individual with a FAC-COTR does not necessarily meet the requirements for the FAC-C level I or the FAC-P/PM mid-level/journeyman.
Continuous Learning: To maintain a FAC-COTR, COTRs are required to earn 40 continuous learning points (CLPs) of skills currency training every two years beginning the first fiscal year following the effective date of this memorandum. ACMs, or designees, shall monitor the continuous learning requirements for employees holding FAC-COTRs to ensure they meet this requirement. Additional guidance on determining continuous learning points is included in Appendix A and learning is available on the FAI Web site. It is the individual’s responsibility to ensure the continuous learning requirements are met.
A FAC-COTR will expire if the 40 CLPs are not earned every two years, and the CAO, or other appropriate agency authority, shall recommend that the COTR’s delegation letters be revoked or modified if this condition is not met. The COTR must be notified in writing in a timely manner of any changes to his or her delegations of authority, and the contractor should be notified as appropriate.
Experience: There is no federal standard for experience and each agency is encouraged to nomnate only those individuals with adequate technical and management experience to
i
7. Acquisition Career Management Information System (ACMIS). ACMIS is the central acquisition workforce information system for all civilian agencies and will support the FAC-COTR program. Agencies and individuals are responsible for maintaining certification documentation for quality assurance purposes. FAI is responsible for managing ACMIS and will issue guidance, as necessary, to support ACMIS implementation. More information can be found at www.fai.gov.
In accordance with OFPP Policy Letter 05-01, COTRs must enter their training data into ACMIS. COTRs must update their existing ACMIS records in a timely manner and keep these records current to reflect their certification status and continuous learning points. OFPP, FAI, and agencies use ACMIS information to make strategic acquisition workforce decisions and agencies and individuals must ensure that this information is accurate.
Appendix A. Guidance on Meeting the Requirements for Continuous Learning Pi(CLP)
These guidelines reflect best-in-practice recommendations for continuous learning. Agencies retain flexibility and supervisors remain responsible for working with COTRs to identify those activities and opportunities of greatest benefit to the professional development of an individual. The training, professional activities, education and experience that are used to meet the CLP requirements must be job related.
A. Training
1) Completing awareness training. Periodically agencies conduct briefing sessions to acquaint the workforce with new or changed policy. Generally, no testing or assessment of knowledge gained is required.
2) Completing learning modules and training courses. These may be formal or informal offerings from a recognized training organization, including in-house training courses/sessions, which include some form of testing/assessment for knowledge gained.
3) Performing Self-Directed Study. An individual can keep current or enhance his or her capabilities through a self-directed study program agreed to by the supervisor.
4) Teaching. Employees are encouraged to share their knowledge and insights with others through teaching of courses or learning modules.
5) Mentoring. Helping others to learn and become more productive workers or managers benefits the agency and the individuals involved.
B. Professional Activities
1) Participating in Organization Management. Membership alone in a professional organization will not be considered as fulfilling continuous learning requirements, but participation in the organization leadership will. This includes holding elected/appointed positions, committee leadership roles, or running an activity for an organization that one is permitted to join under current ethics law and regulation. The employee and supervisor must first ensure that participating in the management of an organization is allowed by the agency.
2) Attending/Speaking/Presenting at Professional Seminars/Symposia/Conferences. Employees can receive points for attending professional seminars or conferences that are job related. However, the supervisor needs to determine that the individual learned something meaningful from the experience. Because significant effort is involved in preparing and delivering presentations, credit should be given for each hour invested in the preparation and presentation.
3) Publishing. Writing articles related to acquisition for publication generally meets the criteria for continuous learning. Points will be awarded only in the year published. Compliance with agency publication policy is required.
4) Participating in Workshops. Points should be awarded for workshops with planned learning outcomes.
C. Education
1) Formal training. Supervisors should use Continuing Education Units (CEUs) as a guide for assigning points for formal training programs that award CEUs. The CEUs can be converted to points at 10 CLP points per CEU.
2) Formal academic programs. For formal academic programs offered by educational institutions, each semester hour is equal to one CEU. A three-hour credit course would be worth three CEUs and 30 CLP points, assuming that it is applicable to the acquisition function.
* Note - Points are earned only in the year accomplished, awarded or published.