Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
second_navbar.gif (585 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 6, No. 2
March-April 2000
 

Download Article
PDF
ASCII
Help
Feedback

Journal Information
About the Journal
Instructions to Authors
Suggested Citation

Other Journal Resources
Announcements
Translations
Image Library

Current Issue
Perspectives
Synopses
Research
Dispatches
Letters
Book Review
News and Notes

Journal Quick Search

Enter Keywords:



Advanced search



Past Issues


Subscribe
To Subscribe to the EID Listserve to receive email notifications of Journal updates please click here.

For Subscriptions to hard copies...

More on Infectious Diseases
MMWR
Disease Information
Educational Materials

 


Letters

Preventing Zoonotic Diseases in Immunocompromised Persons: The Role of Physicians and Veterinarians

To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Grant and Olsen on the role of physicians and veterinarians in preventing zoonotic diseases in immunocompromised persons (1) and the letter by Barton et al. on the risk of pregnant women and young infants for pet-associated illnesses (2). Essentially all aspects and conclusions of the study by Grant and Olsen are also valid in Europe.

In Austria, veterinarians are well educated in zoonotic infections. However, it is impossible for practitioners to know all zoonotic agents in detail. In addition to immunocompromised persons, pregnant women, and young infants, persons in certain occupations are at higher risk for zoonotic infections. Veterinarians are one of these groups. We have completed seroepidemiologic studies involving veterinarians (3) and are testing other groups at high risk, such as slaughterhouse workers, farmers, and zoo employees.

We surveyed 52% of the veterinarians in an Austrian federal state who agreed to participate in the study. They completed a questionnaire and provided case histories so that risk factors could be assessed. We also obtained blood samples. The sera were tested for antibodies to viral, bacterial, and parasitic zoonotic agents. After correlating the serologic results with the statements in the questionnaire, a statistical analysis, and another questionnaire of selected participants, we found transmission of zoonotic agents from animals to veterinarians for influenza A virus H1N1 (prevalence of the infection was much higher among veterinarians than in the general population; a significant number of seropositive veterinarians were swine practitioners [chi-square = pxx .01]); Coxiella burnetii (veterinarians who removed bovine placenta without gloves had a higher risk [chi-square = pxxx .001] of acquiring Coxiella burnetii infections); Brucella sp.; Chlamydia psittaci; Leptospira sp.; Toxoplasma gondii; and Toxocara canis/cati (antibody prevalence was 20 times higher among veterinarians than in the general Austrian population). As a result of the survey, veterinarians know about their profession-specific risk factors and take adequate measures to prevent infections; also, they are more qualified to advise pet owners and persons of other professions at high risk.

In addition to the pathogens listed by Grant and Olsen and the agents listed in this letter, some other zoonotic agents present (at least in Central Europe) are cowpox (mainly acquired from cats; 4-6) and parapox viruses, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, Newcastle disease virus, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Capillaria hepatica (7). On the other hand, animals are not the source of human disease such as leukemia; there is no evidence that feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus, for example, are transmitted to humans (8). The risk of acquiring a zoonotic infection from a pet animal is definitely lower than the emotional and health benefits of pet ownership.

Norbert Nowotny* and Armin Deutz†
*Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Sciences, Vienna, Austria; and †Animal Health Service, Styrian Provincial Government, Department of Veterinary Affairs, Graz, Austria

References

  1. Grant S, Olsen CW. Preventing zoonotic diseases in immunocompromised persons: the role of physicians and veterinarians. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:159-63.
  2. Barton LL, Villar RG, Connick M. Pet-associated zoonoses. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:598.
  3. Nowotny N, Deutz A, Fuchs K, Schuller W, Hinterdorfer F, Auer H, et al. Prevalence of swine influenza and other viral, bacterial, and parasitic zoonoses in veterinarians. J Infect Dis 1997;176:1414-5.
  4. Nowotny N. The domestic cat: a possible transmitter of viruses from rodents to man. Lancet 1994;343:921.
  5. Nowotny N. Serologische Untersuchungen von Hauskatzen auf potentiell humanpathogene Virusinfektionen wildlebender Nagetiere. Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin 1996;198:452-61.
  6. Nowotny N, Fischer OW, Schilcher F, Schwendenwein I, Loupal G, Schwarzmann Th, et al. Pockenvirusinfektionen bei Hauskatzen: klinische, pathohistologische, virologische und epizootiologische Untersuchungen. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 1994;81:362-9.
  7. Juncker-Voss M, Prosl H, Lussy H, Enzenberg U, Auer H, Nowotny N. Serological detection of Capillaria hepatica by indirect immunofluorescence assay. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:431-3.
  8. Nowotny N, Uthman A, Haas OA, Borkhardt A, Lechner K, Egberink HF, et al. Is it possible to catch leukaemia from a cat? Lancet 1995;346:252-3.

Comments to the EID Editors
Please use this form to submit comments to the EID Editors.

Email (optional)


 

Home | Top of Page | Current Issue | Expedited | Upcoming Issue | Past Issue | EID Search | Contact Us

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed March 8, 2000

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention