Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 10, No. 5
May 2004

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

Comments Comments



Back to article

Research

Seasonal Forecast of St. Louis Encephalitis Virus Transmission, Florida

Jeffrey Shaman,*Comments Jonathan F. Day,† Marc Stieglitz,* Stephen Zebiak,‡ and Mark Cane*
*Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; †University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; and ‡International Research Institute for Climate Prediction, Palisades, New York, USA


Appendix B (Online Only)

Dependence in the Transmission Number Category Data

Unfortunately, the sentinel chicken data was recorded in a form that leaves it unclear as to which chicken in which cage becomes seropositive (only the number of chickens is known).  Additionally, the distribution of the seroconversion data is not normal.  As a result, reconstruction of individual chicken time series and demonstration of independence or even the level of dependence is difficult.

Several types of analysis, however, reveal that some level of dependence may exist.  Correlation of both the hard-clipped values of the weekly times series of the number of chickens with HI antibodies at each sentinel site, and the raw values, produces correlation coefficients that range from r=0-0.6, suggesting there is dependence among some of the sentinel sites.  Furthermore, to examine within site dependence we compared the distributions of the weekly number of seropositive chickens within each flock (representing within site clustering of seroconversion events) and the weekly number of flocks with one or more seropositive chickens (representing between site clustering of seroconversion events) to Poisson distributions, which would represent random clustering of such events in time.  Both empirical distributions were more clustered than the Poisson distributions; however, the amount of clustering within and between flocks appeared similar.  These indications of dependence are accounted for in our empirical analysis of the transmission number category.

   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jeffrey Shaman, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 207 Hoffman Laboratories, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; fax: 617-496-7411, email: jshaman@fas.harvard.edu

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted March 30, 2004
This page last reviewed May 24, 2004

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention