Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts for Maintenance, repair and rebuilding of equipment
(FY 2008)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2008
Total dollars: $13,076,016,313
The amount for this search is 3.5% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
Total number of contractors: 15,145
Total number of transactions: 113,680
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$4,005,414,478
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$1,887,714,947
Competition within a limited pool$3,033,580,172
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$29,617,084
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$432,512,360
Not competed for an allowable reason$3,356,440,170
Not identified, soon to be addressed$330,737,101

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Virginia 3 (Robert C. Scott)$1,215,506,204
South Carolina 1 (Henry E. Brown Jr.)$657,449,896
Michigan 10 (Candice S. Miller)$578,476,754
California 53 (Susan A. Davis)$556,604,918
Virginia 8 (James P. Moran)$454,345,699

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components$2,296,069,081
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment$1,632,591,576
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Training Aids and Devices$1,159,382,164
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks$968,131,405
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Weapons$763,919,026

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$4,994,476,355
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$4,043,781,824
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$2,681,701,705
VETERANS AFFAIRS, Department of$294,568,443
U.S. Coast Guard$216,549,383

Top 10 Contractors

General Dynamics Corporation$1,425,083,766
Northrop Grumman Corporation$1,203,514,593
The Boeing Company$793,137,204
Lockheed Martin Corporation$700,969,837
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$697,752,823
Raytheon Company$695,012,184
Dyncorp International Inc.$443,979,466
Saic, Inc.$416,509,979
Computer Sciences Corporation$413,422,142
URS Corporation$387,671,869

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$6,910,427,111
2001$6,779,532,094
2002$7,194,204,438
2003$10,292,336,565
2004$10,764,041,547
2005$12,569,205,503
2006$13,161,523,606
2007$16,454,877,371
2008$13,076,016,313
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$4,389,751
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.