Guide to
Measuring Household Food Security
Revised 2000
PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION
Since publication of the Guide to Implementing the Core Food
Security Module in 1997 by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS,
previously Food and Consumer Service) of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), the standard procedures for measuring food
insecurity and hunger have undergone further refinement and development
based on ongoing research within the federal interagency Food Security
Measurement Project. This new edition of the Guide documents
minor corrections and changes, bringing the procedures described in the
original publication up to date. These include:
- Small changes in the format of the core-module questionnaire for
consistency with the form adopted in 1998 for standard use in the
annual Food Security Supplement to the Census Bureau's Current
Population Survey (CPS), and other applications;
- Significant simplification and streamlining of the recommended
procedure for scoring households with partially missing data;
- Revised and corrected scale-score ranges, based on 1998 data, for
classifying households by food security status categories;
- An alternative, simple method of assigning households with
complete core-module data to the food security status-level
classifications; and
- Brief information on adapting the measure for particular survey
uses.
None of these changes alters the content of the food security
core-module questionnaire, the scaling method underlying the food
security scale, or the basic method of classifying households by food
security status level. Consequently, data collections and analyses based
on the original Guide and on this Revised Edition can be fully
consistent (although users of the original Guide should note the
corrected and updated scale-score ranges presented here).
USDA actively encourages State- and local-area research and
population monitoring applications of the standard national measure of
household food security, as well as continued testing and validation
research on the measure itself.
The ERS Food Security Briefing Room (www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/foodsecurity)
also provides additional technical information and references.
INTRODUCTION
The presence of hunger in American households due to
insufficient resources to obtain food has been a long-standing challenge
to U.S. health, nutrition, and social policy. The success of the
nation's nutrition-assistance safety net, beginning with the National
School Lunch Program in 1946 and later under-girded by the Food Stamp
Program and special programs for unusually vulnerable groups, has meant
that extreme forms of hunger, common in Third-World countries, have been
virtually eliminated in the United States. However, less severe forms of
food insecurity and hunger--deprivation in basic need for food--are
still found within the U.S. and remain a cause for concern. The basic
policy tenet was forcefully stated by the President's Task Force on Food
Assistance in 1984:
It has long been an article of faith among the
American people that no one in a land so blessed with plenty should go
hungry. ...Hunger is simply not acceptable in our society.
The Task Force also noted that, up to the time of its
Report:
There is no official "hunger count" to estimate the
number of hungry people, and so there are no hard data available to
estimate the extent of hunger directly. .... We regret our inability to
document the degree of hunger caused by income limitations, for such
lack of definitive, quantitative proof contributes to a climate in which
policy discussions become unhelpfully heated and unsubstantiated
assertions are then substituted for hard information.
Now the tools do exist to document directly the
extent of food insecurity and hunger caused by income limitations, as
these conditions are experienced and reported by American households.
Following the 1984 Task Force Report--indeed, in part stimulated by the
report--private-sector researchers redoubled efforts to develop the kind
of direct survey measure that could reliably and consistently document
the extent of U.S. hunger. By the early 1990s, an extensive body of
field experience had been gained and substantial consensus had emerged
among nutrition experts on the sound conceptual and practical bases for
such a measure. Meanwhile, Congress enacted the National Nutrition
Monitoring and Related Research Act of 1990, asserting the need for
better monitoring and assessment of the nutritional state of the
American people. The long-range plan formulated under the Act by the U.
S. Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and Health and Human Services (DHHS)
clarified the government's responsibility to help create a sound
national measure of food insecurity and hunger. A key requirement was
that this measure should be appropriate for standard, consistent use
"throughout the national nutrition monitoring system and at
State and local levels.".
A federal interagency working group--the Food
Security Measurement Project--was formed in 1992 to develop the needed
measure, building upon the earlier research and working in close
collaboration with private-sector experts and the U.S. Census Bureau.
Throughout this development process, one objective held firmly in view
was to make the final measure appropriate and feasible for use in
locally designed and conducted food-security surveys.
We believe that this objective is achieved with the
food-security core survey module, which currently is being used
successfully in local applications throughout the U.S. and Canada. While
the module may seem unduly long and repetitive at first sight, it
generally requires less than four minutes of survey time to
administer--under two minutes average in a full population sample with
screening--while offering important strengths not available from single
or small sets of indicators. The key strength of the measure, as
explained below, is that its multiple indicator questions capture and
distinguish the various levels of severity throughout the full
range of severity with which the phenomenon of food
insecurity/hunger is experienced in U.S. conditions. This feature is
critical for accurately assessing the prevalence of food
insecurity because the greater the severity, the less the prevalence and
each separate indicator captures a different degree of severity.
The frequency of the various indicators varies widely depending upon exactly
which level of severity each one reflects.
Food insecurity is a complex, multidimensional
phenomenon which varies through a continuum of successive stages as the
condition becomes more severe. Each stage consists of characteristic
conditions and experiences of food insufficiency to fully meet the basic
needs of household members, and of the behavioral responses of household
members to these conditions. A variety of indicators is needed to
capture the various combinations of food conditions, experiences, and
behaviors that, as a group, characterize each such stage. This is what
the 18-item "core module" set of indicators provides. The
chapters below describe some of the characteristic aspects of the
continuum of food insecurity and hunger, and Exhibit 3-2 (p.32)
illustrates graphically the relationship of the food security measure to
this continuum. An even larger, more detailed indicator set than the
18-item standard U.S. food security scale might do an even better job of
measuring the severity of food insecurity/hunger--e.g., it could
distinguish more fully among the various time paths of the experience
(cyclical, episodic, prolonged, brief but intense, etc.) and among the
alternative behavioral paths that reveal the various coping strategies
that households employ in attempting to deal with food-resource
inadequacy. However, for the main purpose of assessing the prevalence of
food insecurity/hunger at each of its several measurable levels of
severity among U.S. households, the 18-item core module has been shown
to be a stable, robust, and reliable measurement tool.
In addition, for circumstances in which limitations
on survey time are insurmountable, a standard 6-item subset of the
core-module indicator questions also has been developed, designed to
capture reliably the first two thresholds identified in the full
continuum measured by the food-security/hunger scale--i.e., the
threshold of identifiable household food insecurity and the threshold of
identifiable hunger among household members. Testing has shown this
standard subset (Appendix B) to be significantly more reliable in
classifying households accurately to the appropriate food security
status level than alternative small, idiosyncratic sets of food-security
indicators selected on impressionistic or "face-validity"
grounds alone.
Local surveys that employ the systematic, tested, and
validated indicator set provided by the core module for food security
measurement, or the reduced standard 6-item partial set, can obtain
findings that are readily interpretable. Such local survey findings can
be compared directly with national and state-level standard benchmark
statistics published annually by USDA and with many national- or
regional-level tabulations of population subgroups available in the USDA
reports. This food security benchmark data series is available from the
U.S. Census Bureau, by CD-ROM or at the Bureau's web-site www.census.gov
or http://ferret.bls.census.gov.
As an additional strength for comparative research
with local survey findings, data from the standard food security Core
Module also will be available from several specialized national surveys:
the 5-year longitudinal Survey of Program Dynamics (SPD, conducted by
the Census Bureau for DHHS, Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation), the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS,
conducted by the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for
Educational Statistics), the USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by
Individuals (CSFII), and the DHHS 4th National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES-4).
The Core Module has been designed, not only for use
in national surveys, but also for local groups wanting to determine the
extent and severity of food insecurity and hunger within their own
communities, using a technically well grounded and tested method to
produce local prevalence estimates comparable with national and
state-level standard benchmark figures. Local studies using either the
Core Module or the standard 6-item subset can play a key role in
documenting the presence of hunger in the community as measured under
standard national practice, in providing a sound base for broader
community needs assessment, and in helping focus attention on unmet
food-security needs within the community. When the Core Module is used
to collect data on a periodic basis--as USDA is doing for national and
state levels with the annual Food Security Supplement to the Current
Population Survey--it also can provide systematic monitoring of the
community's progress in addressing the hunger and other food-security
needs within its midst.
The next section (Chapter 1) presents the background
description of food security measurement, slightly edited, from the 1997
Guide to Implementing the Core Food Security Module. The second
chapter describes the data collected with the core module survey
instrument. Chapter 3 gives updated guidance on how to score data
collected with the module to produce prevalence estimates for food
insecurity and hunger within the sampled population. The final chapter
offers brief preliminary guidance on procedures for sampling within
local population groups to assure that findings obtained from
food-security surveys can be accurately interpreted and to avoid making
unsupportable generalizations from the data collected.
In general, we recommend that any local group
planning a food security survey seek to work cooperatively with
university or other resource persons experienced in sample-survey work.
Numerous sampling methods are available that are feasible and that can
yield meaningful results, but expertise is needed to design these
methods into your planned survey. Some experienced guidance at the
initial planning and design stage of the study will pay off handsomely
in helping to assure that the survey findings you obtain serve the
purposes you intend, and that you and others can make valid
interpretations of the findings.
Back to the Top
|