 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript
|
|
|
Perspective Reanalyzing the 1900–1920 Sleeping Sickness Epidemic in UgandaE.M. Fèvre,*
Introduction
Uganda is affected by Gambian sleeping sickness, which is caused by infection with Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, and rhodesian sleeping sickness, which is caused by T.b. rhodesiense. T.b. rhodesiense occurs in the eastern part of the country, whereas T.b. gambiense occurs in the northwestern part of the country. From 1900 to 1920, the Busoga region of Uganda experienced a large-scale epidemic of the disease, during which an estimated 250,000 people (1) , a third of the population of the region, died (Figure 1). It is believed that the species of parasite responsible for this first documented epidemic in Uganda was T.b. gambiense and that T.b. rhodesiense was introduced there in the 1940s when another, smaller epidemic was identified in the same region. However, this idea has been the subject of some debate (2,3). The first published description of sleeping sickness cases in the 1900–1920 epidemic was made by A.R. and J.H. Cook in their Church Missionary Society (CMS) Hospital at Mengo on February 11, 1901 (4,5). The extent of the epidemic became clear as the number of case-patients seen at that hospital increased and as the disease was identified around the northern shore of Lake Victoria (6,7). The study of sleeping sickness at the time focused on discovering the causative agent; being newly recognized in Uganda, the disease had not been previously described in eastern Africa. The discovery of trypanosomes as a disease agent and their mode of transmission was relatively recent. Bruce (8) described transmission of cattle trypanosomes by tsetse flies in Zululand in 1895; the causative agent of "Trypanosoma fever" in the Gambia had been indicated in 1902 by Forde (9) and described by Dutton (10) as Trypanosoma gambiense (now classified as T.b. gambiense). At the time of the Ugandan outbreak, Manson (11) believed that the disease was linked to Filaria perstans (now known as Mansonella perstans), a blood-dwelling nematode of no clinical importance. Early efforts in Ugandan patients infected with sleeping sickness focused on detection of F. perstans. T.b. rhodesiense was described for the first time (in present day Zambia) in 1910 (12) , and T.b. rhodesiense was confirmed in Uganda during the next major epidemic 30 years later (13). A New Disease?It is not known how long sleeping sickness may have existed in Uganda before 1900. Most of the pioneering scientists assumed it was a new problem to the region because they found no evidence that it had occurred there before, and they assumed that the disease always occurred as an epidemic. However, Christy (7) noted that sleeping sickness had probably been present long before it was first documented and that it probably originated in Busoga, the core of the present day T.b. rhodesiense focus. Similarly, on reviewing the available evidence, Duke (14) states that "some form of human trypanosomiasis" had occurred around the Ugandan shores of Lake Victoria prior to the epidemic. Confusion over the existence of sleeping sickness in this area was intertwined with the available knowledge of the causative organism. We have already seen that T.b. gambiense was the only human-infective trypanosome to have been described at the time. Furthermore, sleeping sickness was recognized in many parts of central Africa (15). It had not been documented previously in eastern Africa, and the assumption was that the Ugandan disease was an extension of the epidemic raging westward in the (present day) Democratic Republic of Congo. When the epidemic began in Uganda, Castellani (16) noticed two groups of distinct clinical symptoms among the patients. The infection in the first group he called Trypanosoma fever, as is was similar to the disease seen in the Gambia and ascribed to T. gambiense (10,17). The second infection he called sleeping sickness, and tentatively called the trypanosome that he found in those cases T. ugandense (16). The distinction was essentially clinical; what he called sleeping sickness was a much more virulent infection than the Trypanosoma fever caused by T. gambiense. Bruce et al. (18) described two cases of a disease "not unlike Trypanosoma fever" in two patients who had recently come to Uganda (whom he termed Nubians). The patients, a policeman and a prisoner, had arrived from the present day Sudan, where T.b. gambiense occurs today. Bruce et al. (18) later insisted that the less acute "Trypanosoma fever" symptoms were simply the first stage of full-blown sleeping sickness caused by T. gambiense. If the sleeping sickness had been due to T.b. gambiense, it would suggest that the parasite was imported from the west as part of large-scale human population movements that occurred at the time (15). Only Köerner et al. (2) have questioned the identity of the parasite responsible for the first Ugandan epidemic. They argue that as T.b. rhodesiense has occurred in stable endemic foci that can expand and cause epidemics T.b. rhodesiense was probably present in Busoga long before 1901. This is an attractive argument, as the wholesale replacement of one parasite species by another (T.b. gambiense by T.b. rhodesiense) in a region seems unlikely, and such a replacement has not been recorded in any other sleeping sickness focus. In addition, T.b. rhodesiense is primarily a zoonotic parasite in which human-to-human transmission is thought to occur rarely, and human movements (15,19) in isolation from movements of the zoonotic reservoir (20) may not be sufficient to account for its introduction. HypothesisHere we test the hypothesis proposed by Köerner et al. (2) that the parasite responsible for sleeping sickness in the Busoga and surrounding regions of Uganda from 1900 was T.b. rhodesiense. This organism causes an acute disease, resulting in death after a period of 3–12 months (21,22), while T.b. gambiense causes a chronic infection, with which a person may go about daily activities for many months or years (21,23), despite occasional and often mild symptoms. Our analysis, therefore, is based on comparison of the survival time of sleeping sickness patients estimated from clinical notes recorded during the Ugandan epidemic, with survival times of known T. b. rhodesiense patients from the current disease focus in southeast Uganda, and T. b. gambiense patients in western and central Africa. MethodsArchivesThe Mengo Hospital archives (CMS Mission Hospital at Mengo), which include original patient case notes made by the Cook brothers, are held in the archives section of the Mulago Hospital at the Makerere Medical School in Kampala, Uganda. The first sleeping sickness patient recognized in Mengo was admitted on February 11, 1901 (Figure 2). The geographic distribution of the cases seen at this hospital extended across a wide area, although most of the patients came from the close vicinity. Many patients reporting in the latter years of the epidemic were referred to the specialist hospital run by the Royal Society Sleeping Sickness Commission in Entebbe (set up as part of the Commission’s study on the disease), or later to the sleeping sickness isolation camps on islands in Lake Victoria. Some details of the treatments prescribed and numbers of cases seen in these camps are available (24,25). At this time in the development of therapy for sleeping sickness, no effective drugs were available for the disease, so death of the patients was due to sleeping sickness and, rarely, treatment side-effects; the data included here show the true clinical course of the disease in untreated patients. Data CollectionFor each patient treated at the Mengo Hospital with diagnosed sleeping sickness, full details as they appeared in the archives were entered into a database, which was used for later analyses. This electronic database has been made available to the archivists in Mengo. Full details were entered for patients seen through 1910; beyond this time, many patients were turned away. In addition, the authorities were managing to bring the epidemic under control, and the number of cases was diminishing. Additional data were also extracted from the Reports of the Royal Society Sleeping Sickness Commission (6,18). T.b. rhodesiense ComparisonOdiit et al. (22) published data on duration of symptoms in 30 patients who died of sleeping sickness within a week of seeking treatment for T.b. rhodesiense infection at the Livestock Research Institute sleeping sickness hospital in Tororo, Uganda, between 1988 and 1990. T.b. gambiense ComparisonAdams et al. (26) conducted postmortem examinations on 16 patients with fatal T.b. gambiense infections and state that few fatal cases are documented and that duration of illness before death is "rarely established"; this accounts for the scarcity of time-to-death data in contemporary literature. One source of T.b. gambiense clinical data (27) presents important details of the clinical course of the disease to death but could not be used in this analysis as no estimates were made of the length of illness before treatment or death. However, Yorke (28) does present a summary of untreated cases between 1908 and1919 in various countries in West Africa. These countries include the French Congo (present-day Republic of Congo), the Gambia, and the Belgian Congo (present-day Democratic Republic of the Congo). Full details for each patient are not provided, and the survival times for the different groups of patients were taken as the average of the range given (e.g., five patients who were followed-up after 2–3 years were each given a survival time of 2.5 years). These data were supplemented by several more recently published case histories for T.b. gambiense patients who were treated in the United States and Europe after various periods of travel in Africa (23,29–33) ; the date of the last visit to Africa before diagnosis was taken as the infection date for these patients, and survival time was taken to the point of first treatment or death. Cases of congenital sleeping sickness from this literature were excluded. Statistical AnalysesA survival analysis (34) was conducted to compare the time from onset of symptoms to death of the Ugandan patients in the Mengo archives and Sleeping Sickness Commission Reports (6,18) from 1901 to 1910, and known T.b. rhodesiense (22) and T.b. gambiense patients (23,28–33). The criteria for including a patient from the Mengo archive dataset were that the case had been recorded as a sleeping sickness death following inpatient stay in the hospital, that the length of the hospital stay was recorded, and that the length of time of illness before admission had been recorded in the clinical notes. That is, an estimate of the total time of the clinical course of the illness, from onset of symptoms to death, was available. The same criteria were applied to the clinical notes appearing in the Sleeping Sickness Commission Reports (6,18). The Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted in S+ 2000 (MathSoft, Inc., Cambridge, MA) and the survival curves were compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. ResultsDescriptive StatisticsFrom 1901 to 1910, a total of 11,767 case-patients were recorded in the Mengo inpatient records. This figure excludes all patients admitted in 1902 because all the records from that year were destroyed in a fire. Just over 1% of these (204 cases) were sleeping sickness cases. The outcome of admission was biased in favor of discharge (160 cases). Five patients were referred to the Royal Society sleeping sickness hospital, and 24 deaths were recorded. Of these 24 deaths, 11 (Table 1) untreated patients had complete records of date of admission and death and of the duration of symptoms before admission. Sixteen cases from the Sleeping Sickness Commission Reports were included with these (Table 2). All 30 cases presented by Odiit et al. (22) were included, and 88 untreated, diagnosed case-patients were extracted from Yorke (28). Of these, 54 had died and 34 were still alive on follow-up (accounted for by censoring in the survival analysis). Eight contemporary T.b. gambiense patients were included (23,29–33), all of whom survived to treatment. Survival CurvesThe Kaplan-Meier Survivorship curves resulting from the analysis of these data are shown in Figure 3. The median survival times were 2 months, 4 months, and 36 months for the Tororo 1988–1990, Mengo Hospital Plus Sleeping Sickness Commission reports 1901–1910, and western African datasets, respectively. Log-Rank TestThe log-rank test showed no significant difference between the Ugandan
1901–1910 and 1988–1990 survival rates ( DiscussionThe clinical course of sleeping sickness during the period from 1901 to 1910 Ugandan epidemic does not differ from contemporary T.b. rhodesiense cases in Uganda (22). The duration of illness from first onset of symptoms of documented T.b. gambiense patients did differ significantly from both the Ugandan 1901–1910 and Ugandan 1988–1990 patients. The clinical course from the 1901–1910 epidemic is consistent with infection with parasites belonging to the T.b. rhodesiense subspecies, and is consistent with the hypothesis proposed by Köerner et al. (2). Unfortunately, no archived parasite material exists for this period, which would allow the molecular confirmation of this result by screening for the SRA gene (35), which is specific to T.b. rhodesiense, or for screening with T.b. gambiense-specific molecular markers (36). Given these findings, how might the observations made by Castellani (16), that two distinct clinical pictures were sometimes observed in Uganda at the time, be explained? The designation as "Nubians" of some of the patients suggests that these patients were from Sudan. They were certainly migrants and may well have been carrying T.b. gambiense parasites before migrating that were discovered on examination in Uganda. Although local transmission of these parasites cannot be excluded, T.b. gambiense was probably not responsible for the widespread deaths in the Busoga region generally. Most of the cases described by Christy (7) as he roamed around Uganda were of an acute disease. Hodges, who was the Medical Officer for the Uganda Protectorate, states that the time to death of Ugandan patients from realization they were sick was 3–4 months (24) , based on a great many observations, and that the duration of illness rarely exceeded 10 months. This observation is further echoed by Low and Castellani (37), who state that "very chronic cases, running a course of more than a year’s duration, are very rare." T.b. gambiense, if it did exist concurrently, would probably have been limited to those areas where migrant workers for the British authorities were allowed to settle. These settlement areas were purposefully established away from tsetse-infested bush in the efforts to control the epidemic (38). If both species of human infective trypanosome (T.b. gambiense and T.b. rhodesiense) were in Uganda during the 1901–1910 epidemic, and both were treated at the Mengo and Sleeping Sickness Commission hospitals, the data acquired from the archives for deaths would be biased towards clinical descriptions of T.b. rhodesiense. The T.b. gambiense data presented here demonstrate that many of the patients are treated before death. For similar reasons, T.b. gambiense would be poorly represented among deaths in Mengo and the Sleeping Sickness Commission; patients would have been discharged, as the symptoms would not have been considered serious enough for them to remain in the scarce hospital beds. Also, mixed infections with both T.b. rhodesiense and T.b. gambiense could have occurred if T.b. gambiense was being transmitted locally; however, due to the acute nature of T.b. rhodesiense infections, patients infected with both parasites would most likely have been seen with T.b. rhodesiense–like symptoms. Therefore, the results of this analysis cannot exclude T.b. gambiense as a cause of illness among some patients but can positively include T.b. rhodesiense as a cause of sleeping sickness at the time. The epidemic is likely to have been due to T.b. rhodesiense with occasional cases of T.b. gambiense in patients who had migrated from T.b. gambiense foci on the present northwestern border of Uganda (e.g., "Nubians"). Case number 136 from Mengo (Table 1) may well be one of the occasional T.b. gambiense case-patients (or the result of recall errors), as the patient reported having been ill for 24 months. This one case does not affect the outcome of the analysis, however (Figure 3). Rinderpest and Cattle RestockingIf, as these data suggest, the 1900–1920 epidemic was due, at least in part, to T.b. rhodesiense, the question arises as to its causes, and the cause of the spread of sleeping sickness through the whole of the region to previously unaffected areas. There is no doubt that the onset of the colonial administration in Uganda resulted in social changes and population mobility (39), which had important environmental consequences (39). In referring to the causation of T.b. gambiense epidemics in central Africa, Lyons (19) blames the disruptive effects of colonization. Human movements had, however, occurred regularly throughout Africa’s history (2), and the situation in Uganda was doubtless more complex. Some other trigger, in conjunction with these factors, likely was involved in spreading sleeping sickness from the endemic foci outwards. It has been suggested that this might have been rinderpest, an infectious disease of livestock (39). The start of the sleeping sickness epidemic coincides with the end of the rinderpest pandemic in cattle (39,40). In the early 1890s, and for the decade that followed, rinderpest, or cattle plague, ravaged most of Africa. Millions of cattle died from this virulent viral infection (40), causing sociologic and ecologic upheavals throughout the continent. Although rinderpest is often linked to the sleeping sickness outbreaks in eastern Africa, it has been possibly linked for the wrong reasons. The disease-induced cattle depopulation is generally thought to have resulted in a change in the dominant vegetation in the whole region; pasture lands reverted to bush and the distribution of tsetse-fly vector of sleeping sickness expanded (41). Although these ecologic changes occurred, they may not have been directly responsible for the spread of sleeping sickness. The movement of cattle during livestock restocking (20) may be linked to the introduction of T.b. rhodesiense sleeping sickness, a zoonosis with a principally domestic cattle reservoir, to previously unaffected areas that resulted in serious outbreaks of disease. With the large-scale local and regional movements of animals that occurred after the rinderpest pandemic, as animals were traded in the cattle-depopulated areas, trypanosomes may have moved with them. In conjunction with the expansion of tsetse distributions as the ecology changed, the setting was ripe for a major sleeping sickness problem. Ford (39) notes that in setting up the Uganda Protectorate, a great deal of cattle movements occurred, either as groups moved away from areas under British control, or in search of post-rinderpest pasture. He also points out that the culture of large-scale cattle trading was well established. Local cattle movements as part of the restocking would have been extensive. T.b. rhodesiense could have spread from the core of the Busoga and other endemic foci to other tsetse-infested areas all around the northern Lake Victoria shore. Recent molecular studies also challenge the conventional wisdom that T.b. rhodesiense spread through East Africa and to Uganda from Zambia (13) , where it was first described. Tilley et al. (42) and Hide et al. (43) suggest that T.b. rhodesiense retains a stable genetic constitution through time and show that strains from Zambia are phylogenetically quite distinct from T.b. rhodesiense in Uganda. It is therefore unlikely that the parasite spread from there to Uganda. Rather, as Köerner et al. (2) suggested, T.b. rhodesiense has probably been present in southeast Uganda, either at endemic or epidemic levels (or both at different times), for hundreds of years. The dynamics of the spread of the disease, involving cattle movements and restocking (20) , have probably been similar since the first association of cattle and humans in tsetse-infested areas of this part of the continent. Acknowledgments
References
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
|
|
This page posted March
2, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|
|
2
= 1.7; df =1, p = 0.12). Therefore, the clinical course from onset
of symptoms to death in this sample of patients from the 1901–1910 epidemic
in southern Uganda was not significantly different to that of patients
in Tororo with T.b. rhodesiense infections from 1988 to 1990. The
Ugandan 1901–1910 and West African survival rates were significantly different
(