| |
Remarks by Bruce I. Knight, Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service, at
the National Organization of Professional Black NRCS Employees Annual Training
Conference St. Louis, MO
December 2, 2003
It is a pleasure to be here today to talk about where NRCS is headed and to
touch a bit on the role of the National Organization of Professional Black NRCS
Employees in helping us reach our goals.
Last year when I addressed this conference in Texas, I was awestruck by the
level of enthusiasm, intimacy, and energy. So I have been looking forward to
this meeting for months.
I want to thank Bill Hunt and all the many people who made this training
conference possible. It takes a lot of work to put together a conference of this
size and make it work smoothly. You have all done a great job.
The need for training has never been greater. There is simply no way we can
implement our mission, let alone the 2002 farm bill without a well trained and
well equipped workforce.
As you know, the 2002 farm bill is providing a record level of investment in
conservation on America’s farms and ranches. Putting the farm bill to work
requires new ways of doing business. We need to form new partnerships, and we
need to build a strong Technical Service Provider system if we are to succeed.
I have described this changing role for NRCS as becoming more of a catalyst or
enabler for conservation. That means with the workload we have, we need to work
more with others to help get conservation done.
I see an important role for the Organization as a catalyst in the new NRCS. The
Organization is dedicated to adding value to NRCS by serving as a bridge to
communities. This is a good role for the Organization, as NRCS and the rest of
the department work to increase the level of service to traditionally
underserved populations.
We are working to make NRCS services and programs available to all segments of
the producer community, wherever they live in the 50 states. All of our programs
are an opportunity for the members of the Organization and others to build
bridges to important agricultural communities.
The Organization is also playing a role in building diversity throughout the
conservation partnership. Last spring, we held a Partnership Diversity Summit in
Washington, DC. The session brought together the leaders of several major
partner organizations: NACD, NARC&DC, NASCA, and NCDEA, along with the
presidents of most of the NRCS employee organizations.
We had a productive session discussing what we all need to do to increase the
diversity of our leadership structures and improve our service to traditionally
underserved populations. One of the action steps at that meeting was greater
interaction between the professional and partner organizations. That panel of
presenters follows me on today’s agenda.
CIVIL RIGHTS POLICY STATEMENT
I would like to talk a bit about the NRCS Civil Rights Policy Statement. The
statement was fairly new when I spoke at this conference last year in Texas. I
said then that I stand behind every word in this statement – and that is still
true.
I am working hard to make sure NRCS lives up to the commitment represented by
this policy. As an agency, we need to live up to this policy with regard to our
workforce. We need to match the diversity of our recruiting to the diversity of
our nation. This is particularly true for recruiting African American employees.
There is under-representation of African Americans employees within USDA.
Addressing this situation will take hard work all across the nation, and it will
take time. We will need strong recruiting today, and we will need to work with
the 1890 schools, other colleges and universities, and in communities around the
country to build a stronger recruiting base in the future.
Beyond recruiting, we also need to make sure that all of our employees have an
opportunity to move up in the Agency. We also need to retain the diversity we
already have, even as we face the upcoming loss of many of our experienced
employees through retirement.
Competitive Sourcing
Another workforce issue is competitive sourcing.
I know that the concept of Competitive Sourcing has been very unsettling to many
NRCS employees, particularly for employees whose jobs are being studied. But I
want you to know that we value your contributions to this great agency, that we
will make this effort fair and equitable, and that we will use all the tools at
our disposal to ease the transition of any employees who wind up being affected
by competitive sourcing.
There are a few things I would like you to keep in mind when you are thinking
about Competitive Sourcing. First, Competitive Sourcing is not a reflection on
the quantity or quality of your service or your dedication to conservation.
Second, it is not directed at NRCS. It is a government-wide effort, to bring
down the costs of government services – to provide value to the taxpayer. Third,
Competitive Sourcing is not an effort to get rid of government employees. There
are no workforce reduction targets.
In FY 2003, we studied more than 1,200 positions. That was about 30% of the
total we are called on to study in the entire competitive sourcing process –
from now through 2007. And nearly twice the number as was targeted for FY 2003.
In nearly all the studies, NRCS could provide the services more economically
than the private sector. So, of 1200 positions studied, only a handful went out
of the agency.
Getting an approved plan for competitive sourcing in FY 2004 has been a slow
process, so we decided to proceed under the 2004 draft plan for the time being.
This plan assumes that we will be able to count Technical Service Providers
toward the NRCS competitive sourcing goal for the year. So we will be studying
many fewer positions than would otherwise be the case. Information on the draft
plan will be posted on the competitive sourcing web site in the next few days.
The key to studying these jobs is to devote the time and energy needed to
describe the functions accurately. We will need your help in making these
comparisons.
I am committed to helping affected employees in every way possible. Whenever one
of our studies results in work moving out of the Federal government, we will do
everything we can to retain affected employees within NRCS and to assist those
people into the career options of their choice.
NRCS Reorganization
Another workforce issue is our proposed reorganization. As we at NRCS move to
become catalysts of conservation, our emphasis on conservation planning and the
technology that supports us will become increasingly important.
As you know, we are reorganizing our activities above the State office level. We
are doing this to strengthen our ability to help America’s farmers and ranchers
reach their conservation goals and offer them the latest science-based
technologies. We will do this by emphasizing the services that various
headquarters functions provide to the States and field offices.
This proposed reorganization will strengthen the multi-disciplinary technology
support to States; consolidate similar functions to enhance communications and
coordination (form follows function); align human capital resources with
mission, goals and organizational objectives; provide an improved career ladder
for technical personnel; and balance Deputy areas and workload at the national
level.
The reorganization will not directly affect State, area, and field office
personnel. For those currently assigned to Institutes, Cooperating Scientist
positions, regional offices, and the divisions being changed at national
headquarters, this can be a time of uncertainty. However, change also creates
many opportunities. Over the course of the next few months, we will be working
hard to provide regular updates.
We will not be reducing NRCS staffing through this proposed reorganization. I am
committed to offer a position to every employee affected by this reorganization
and to using the full range of personnel tools to ease the transition for
everyone involved.
We submitted the reorganization package to the Department the middle of October
and hope to have it approved fairly soon. I assure you that a full Civil Rights
analysis was part of the package.
Once we have approval, we will implement the reorganization as quickly as
possible. That will be this winter.
You can look for the latest information on the reorganization on the new NRCS
employee intranet – my.NRCS. The new intranet is available to employees only and
is your key to all kinds of information about NRCS. All you need to access
my.NRCS is your WebTCAS username and pin.
Farm Bill Opportunities
Even as we proceed with our reorganization, we must still move forward on farm
bill implementation.
As I said at the beginning, the new farm bill makes more resources available to
more farmers than ever before. It is important that we all work hard to extend
the benefits of the new farm bill to everyone who is eligible. That means
doubling our efforts to serve all kinds of farmers. It means reaching out to all
communities, including African American farmers and ranchers. It means being
open, fair, courteous, and responsive.
USDA is being held increasingly responsible for delivering Agriculture programs
to all citizens in this country, and that responsibility flows through
agreements and contracts to everywhere Federal dollars are involved. NRCS and
all of its partners must live up to this responsibility in everything we do,
from meetings with landowners to delivery of services. That is what we have been
talking about with our partner organizations.
Many of you are well positioned in your local communities to get our messages
out to those who could benefit from our programs and services.
NRCS Priorities for FY 2004
The final thing I want to talk about today is our Agency priorities for the
current fiscal year.
Our first priority is to streamline and implement conservation programs. The
goal is to improve efficiency in program delivery through clearer and more
consistent guidance, and common procedures and processes.
Thank all of you who submitted streamlining suggestions this summer. The Chief’s
Advisory Committee reported on your suggestions early in September. We adopted
25 recommendations and assigned various executives to head up implementing them.
We have also streamlined some programs as part of farm bill implementation. In
September, we were able to reallocate several million dollars as a result of
some of those streamlining measures.
The second priority is to implement the President’s management initiatives. The
first of those initiatives is Strategic Management of Human Capital. We must be
ready for the retirement bulge. We need good training for present employees And
we need good recruiting for new employees. The second Presidential initiative is
competitive sourcing, which I already covered in some detail. The other three
Presidential management initiatives are improved financial performance,
expanding e-government, and budget and program Integration.
Our third priority is to increase outreach and workforce diversity. We must make
sure all farmers and ranchers have equal access to our programs. NRCS and its
partners must be as diverse as the communities we serve
And our fourth priority is to enable conservation delivery by modernization and
expansion of Technical Capacity. One way of doing this is to continue updating
our technical standards and writing new ones to accommodate new technologies.
Other ways include our reorganization and effective use of Technical Service
Providers.
Conclusion
So, there are challenging times ahead for all of us in our effort to become the
catalysts of conservation.
I know, because you are attending this week’s conference, that you have the
dedication and the energy to help NRCS meet these challenges.
Bill, I want to correct you on one thing. You called us the “vanguard of our
nation’s conservation system.” If we embrace change and strive for excellence,
we will be known as the vanguard of the world’s conservation systems.
I wish you good luck and continued success.
| |
|