Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 12, No. 5
May 2006

Adobe Acrobat logo

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

PDF Version | Comments Comments | Email this article Email this article



References
Figure

Letter

Rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis

Muhamed-Kheir Taha,*Comments Maria Leticia Zarantonelli,* Corinne Ruckly,* Dario Giorgini,* and Jean-Michel Alonso*
*Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

Suggested citation for this article


Figure
Figure.

Click to view enlarged image

Figure. Blood bacterial counts in 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (Janvier, France), challenged intraperitoneally...

To the Editor: Immediate management of meningococcal disease requires antimicrobial drug treatment of patients with β-lactams and chemoprophylaxis of contact persons with rifampin. High-level resistance to rifampin (MIC >32 mg/L) in Neisseria meningitidis is provoked by mutations (most frequently at the residue His 552) in the rpoB gene encoding the b subunit of RNA polymerase (1,2). Resistance may lead to chemoprophylaxis failure and must be rapidly detected (3). Concerns have been raised about the clonal spread of resistant isolates (1); however, rifampin-resistant isolates are rarely reported. We tested 6 N. meningitidis isolates corresponding to 3 pairs of linked cases of meningococcal disease. In each pair, the index case was due to a rifampin-susceptible isolate and was followed by the secondary case due to a resistant isolate in a contact person. Phenotyping and genotyping of the isolates showed that each pair belonged to a different major serogroup (A, B, and C) and to a different genetic lineage (ST-7, ST-32, and ST-2794) (Figure). We next amplified a fragment in rpoB between codons 421 and 701 by using oligonucleotide rpoBF1 (5´gttttcccagtcacgacgttgtaCTGTCCGAAGCCCAACAAAACTCTTGG3´) and rpoBR1 (5´ttgtgagcggataacaatttcTTCCAAGAATGGAATCAGGGATGCTGC3´). The 2 oligonucleotides harbor adaptors (in lower case) corresponding to universal forward and reverse oligonucleotides that can be used for sequencing after amplification. We also analyzed 2 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples corresponding to 2 linked culture-negative cases of meningococcal disease in which the second case was believed to have been caused by rifampin-resistant N. meningitidis. These 2 cases were diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of meningococcal DNA, as previously described (4).

The 3 rifampin-susceptible isolates harbored a wild-type rpoB sequence (His 552), as did the first CSF sample. All 3 rifampin-resistant isolates harbored a His→Tyr mutation, while analysis of the second CSF sample showed a His→Asn mutation (Figure). Both mutations have been observed in N. meningitidis (3). No other difference in the sequence was seen among all isolates on the amplified fragment. This approach can rapidly detect rpoB mutations and can be applied to culture-negative clinical samples.

The virulence of the isolates was evaluated through their ability to provoke bacteremia in mice after 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (Janvier, France) were injected intraperitoneally. Bacteremia is a good indicator of bacterial virulence as it reflects bacterial survival upon invasion of the bloodstream. The experimental design was approved by the Institut Pasteur Review Board. The rifampin-resistant clinical isolate LNP22330 showed substantially reduced bacteremia when compared to the corresponding susceptible isolate LNP21362 (Figure). Such a reduction was not significant for the other 2 pairs (LNP18278/LNP18378 and LNP18368/LNP18491), but these strains were all less virulent than LNP21362, with ≈1 log10 lower blood bacterial loads. The 3 pairs of isolates belonged to different genetic lineages according to the multilocus sequence typing typing. Indeed, we have recently proved that virulence of meningococcal isolates in the mouse model depends on the genetic lineage of the tested isolate (5).

To better study the impact of rpoB mutation on meningococcal virulence we constructed an isogenic mutant strain, NM05-08, by transforming the susceptible isolate LNP21362 with a PCR-amplified fragment from a resistant isolate (LNP22330), as previously described (6). The PCR fragment corresponded to the product of amplification between the oligonucleotides ropB1UP (5´ggccgtctgaaCTGTCCGAAGCCCAACAAAACTCTTGG3´) and rpoBR1. The oligonucleotide RpoB1UP is the same as the upstream rpoBF1 but with a DNA uptake sequence (in lower case) that was added at the 5´ end to permit DNA transformation (7). The transformant strain NM05-08 was resistant to rifampin (MIC >32 mg/L), and the sequence of the rpoB gene confirmed the His→Tyr mutation. When compared to the parental isolate (LNP21362), strain NM05-08 showed reduced virulence. Indeed, bacterial loads were similar to those observed for the resistant isolate LNP22330 (Figure). These results strongly suggest a direct negative impact of rpoB mutations on meningococcal virulence. Mutations in the rpoB gene have been reported to confer pleiotropic phenotypes (8).

The data reported here show that rifampin-resistant isolates were not clonal but belonged to different genetic lineages. The results of virulence assays in mice suggest that mutations in rpoB in resistant isolates may have a major biological cost for N. meningitidis, which can be defined as lower bacterial fitness in terms of survival in the bloodstream. This biological cost could explain the lack of clonal expansion of meningococcal isolates that acquired resistance to rifampin.

References

  1. Carter PE, Abadi FJ, Yakubu DE, Pennington TH. Molecular characterization of rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1256–61.
  2. Nolte O, Muller M, Reitz S, Ledig S, Ehrhard I, Sonntag HG. Description of new mutations in the rpoB gene in rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis selected in vitro in a stepwise manner. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:1077–81.
  3. Stefanelli P, Fazio C, La Rosa G, Marianelli C, Muscillo M, Mastrantonio P. Rifampin-resistant meningococci causing invasive disease: detection of point mutations in the rpoB gene and molecular characterization of the strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47:219–22.
  4. Taha MK. Simultaneous approach for nonculture PCR-based identification and serogroup prediction of Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:855–7.
  5. Lancellotti M, Guiyoule A, Ruckly C, Hong E, Alonso JM, Taha MK. Conserved virulence of C to B capsule switched Neisseria meningitidis clinical isolates belonging to ET-37/ST-11 clonal complex. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:191–6.
  6. Antignac A, Kriz P, Tzanakaki G, Alonso JM, Taha MK. Polymorphism of Neisseria meningitidis penA gene associated with reduced susceptibility to penicillin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47:285–96.
  7. Goodman SD, Scocca JJ. Identification and arrangement of the DNA sequence recognized in specific transformation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:6982–6.
  8. Jin DJ, Gross CA. Characterization of the pleiotropic phenotypes of rifampin-resistant rpoB mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:5229–31.

 

Suggested citation for this article:
Taha M-K, Zarantonelli ML, Ruckly C, Giorgini D, Alonso J-M. Rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 May [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no05/05-1296.htm

   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Muhamed-Kheir Taha, Directeur Adjoint du Centre, National de Reference des Meningocoques, Unite des Neisseria, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Dr Roux, Paris 75724 CEDEX 15, France; email: mktaha@pasteur.fr

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

Email this article

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Your email:

Your friend's email:

Message (optional):

 

 

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted April 17, 2006
This page last reviewed April 19, 2006

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention