Integrating Commodity and Conservation Programs: Design Options and Outcomes
By Roger Claassen, Marcel Aillery, and Cynthia Nickerson
Economic Research Report No. (ERR-44) 61 pp,
October 2007
Can a single program support farm income and encourage producers to adopt environmentally sound farming practices? While simple in concept, attempting to roll the farm income support features of existing commodity programs and conservation payments into a single program raises questions. Exactly how would farm commodity and conservation payments be combined? What difference would it make for environmental gain and farm income support? This report approaches the questions in two ways. First, spending patterns in existing commodity and conservation programs are analyzed to determine the extent to which producers who are currently receiving commodity payments also receive conservation payments. Then, a number of hypothetical program scenarios are devised and analyzed to estimate how emphasis on current income support recipients would differ from a combined program that focuses on achieving cost-effective environmental gain. The results show that policymakers face significant tradeoffs between environmental (conservation) objectives and farm income support objectives in designing a program that provides both income support and environmental gain.
Keywords: commodity programs, payments, producers, conservation, environmental performance, environmental gain, income support, green payments, cost, farm, compliance, practices, eligibility, distribution, ERS, USDA
In this report ... Chapters are
in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.
- Abstract, Acknowledgments, Contents, and Summary, 2,051 kb.
- Supporting Farm Income and the Environment: Can a Single Program Do Both?, 66 kb.
- Existing Conservation and Income Support Programs: Different Purposes, Different Payments, Different Producers, 211 kb.
- Green Payment Program Design: A Matter of Perspective, 72 kb.
- Producer Participation: Doing the Math, 63 kb.
- Green Payment Program Design Tradeoffs:
Do Income Support and Environmental Gain Go Well Together?, 364 kb.
- Conclusions, 60 kb.
- References, 60 kb.
- Appendix 1: Environmental Index for Green Payments, 80 kb.
- Appendix 2: Acres Eligible for Treatment, 67 kb.
- Appendix 3: Producer Economic Cost/Willingness to Accept (WTA), 111 kb.
- Appendix 4: Producer Decision Rules, 247 kb.
- Appendix 5: Sensitivity Analysis, 260 kb.
Order this report (stock #ERR-44)
Updated date: October 30, 2007
|
