Jump to main content.

Adequacy Status of the Indiana and Ohio Portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio/Kentucky/Indiana, Submitted 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration for Transportation Conformity Purposes 

PDF Version (2 pp, 89K, About PDF)

[Federal Register: June 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 114)]
[Notices]
[Page 33429-33430]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12jn08-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0520, EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0585; FRL-8578-6]

Adequacy Status of the Indiana and Ohio Portions of the
Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio/Kentucky/Indiana, Submitted 8-Hour Ozone
Attainment Demonstration for Transportation Conformity Purposes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in the Indiana
and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio/Kentucky/Indiana
area are adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations.
Ohio submitted the Cincinnati-Hamilton budgets with an 8-hour ozone
attainment demonstration on April 22, 2008. As a result of our finding,
the Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio/
Kentucky/Indiana area must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8-hour
ozone attainment demonstration for future transportation conformity
determinations.

DATES: This finding is effective June 27, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist,
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR-18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)
353-8777, Maietta.anthony@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

Background

    Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. On May 6, 2008, EPA Region 5 sent a letter to the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency stating that the 2008 MVEBs for the
Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio/Kentucky/
Indian area, which were submitted with the state's 8-hour ozone
attainment demonstration, are adequate. Receipt of these MVEBs was
announced on EPA's transportation conformity Web site, and no comments
were submitted. The finding is available at EPA's conformity Web site:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
    The adequate 2008 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for VOC and
NOX for the Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati-
Hamilton, Ohio/Kentucky/Indiana area are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               2008 MVEB
                                                                 (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC.........................................................       46.00
NOX.........................................................       91.36
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and

[[Page 33430]]

projects conform to state air quality implementation plans and
establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not
they do conform. Conformity to a State Implementation Plan (SIP) means
that transportation activities will not produce new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality standards.
    The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for transportation conformity purposes
are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for
determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004,
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038, and we used the information in these
resources while making our adequacy determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also
should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even
if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
    The finding and the response to comments are available at EPA's
transportation conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: June 3, 2008.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E8-13225 Filed 6-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.