|
Peer Review Plans |
Title and Description:
SEDAR 15, South Atlantic Red Snapper and Greater Amberjack
Title was Previously: Benchmark Stock Assessment for South Atlantic Greater Amberjack, Red Snapper, and South Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico Mutton Snapper
This information product is a determination of the condition and status of the fishery resource stocks (South Atlantic red snapper and greater amberjack) relative to definitions for overfishing and overfished status. The information includes impacts of various management scenarios on the status of the stocks, estimates of management benchmarks, and recovery trajectories for those stocks determined to be overfished. The information is provided to the appropriate regional fishery management council (South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, or Caribbean) to be used as the basis of their management decisions, which are subsequently approved and disseminated by the Secretary of Commerce through NOAA Fisheries.
ID: 79 Info. Type: ISI
Estimated Dissemination Date: 3/28/2008
Contact Person: Rebecca Rootes NOAA Locator
Date First Posted in Peer Review Agenda: 06/16/2007
Estimated Peer Review Start Date: 1/28/2008
Review type: panel
Expected number of peer reviewers: 3 or fewer
Peer reviewers will be selected by: a designated outside organization
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? no
Will there be opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? yes
How? This information will be developed and reviewed through the Southeast Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process, a cooperative fishery management council process initiated in 2002 to improve the quality and reliability of fishery stock assessments in the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean. SEDAR is managed by the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic Regional Fishery Management Councils in coordination with NOAA Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commissions. SEDAR emphasizes constituent and stakeholder participation in assessment development, transparency in the assessment process, and a rigorous and independent scientific review of the completed stock assessments. SEDAR workshops are open to the public, announcements are published in the Federal Register with dates and times and public testimony is accepted at the workshops.
When? The peer review of the benchmark stock assessment for South Atlantic greater amberjack, South Atlantic red snapper, South Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico mutton snapper will take place January 28-February 1, 2008 in Raleigh, NC. The meeting is open to the public.
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? yes
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: fisheries biology, ecology, life history, population/community/ecosystem modeling
Comments on Peer Review:
Reviewers will be selected by: A designated outside organization. The peer review will be conducted by three outside reviewers contracted through the Center for Independent Experts (CIE), an independent, external organization at the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science that provides peer reviews of NOAA Fisheries science. Additional information regarding the CIE can be found at: http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/groups/cie/.
SEDAR, SouthEast Data, Assessment and Review is a Regional Fishery Management Council process, not a National Marine Fisheries Service process. The Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic and Caribbean Fishery Management Councils approved the Terms of Reference which specified the actual objectives of the SEDAR:
a) Data Workshop participants (Data.pdf),
b) Assessment Workshop participants (Assessment.pdf),
c) Review Workshop participants (Review.pdf), and
d) Guidelines (SEDAR Guidelines.pdf)
SEDAR consists of :
a) One assessment report, though there are multiple supporting documents. The core of what is being reviewed is the assessment report. The others provide detail that they may consult but are under no obligation or directive to formally review.
b) Four reviewers - 3 Center for Independent Experts appointees and 1 Council appointee
c) All reviewers receive the same information and review the same report.
d) The chairman compiles the reviewer report into one single cohesive document and provides a grammatical and factual edit. He does not prepare the report, and all changes are reviewed and approved by the panel.
Final peer review report:
South Atlantic red snapper: http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/sedar/download/S15%20SAR%201%20Finalfixed.pdf?id=DOCUMENT
South Atlantic greater amberjack: http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/sedar/download/S15%20SAR%202%20Final.pdf?id=DOCUMENT