Link to NOAA home page Peer Review Plans

Title and Description:
Required Survival Rate Changes to Meet Technical Recovery Team Abundance and Productivity Viability Criteria for Interior Columbia ESA-Listed Pacific Salmon Populations
The report will consist of a technical report describing, for many populations in the Interior Columbia River Basin, the difference ("gap") between the population’s current survival rates and the survival rate needed to achieve a biological status consistent with Endangered Species Act (ESA) delisting goals. The report will play a role in recovery planning for ESA-listed Pacific salmon populations and ongoing discussions and planning for the operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS). Although many factors and analyses are expected to influence development of ESA recovery plans for Pacific salmon and planning for operation of the FCRPS, this report will quantify the survival "gap" that would need to be filled in order to meet the Technical Recovery Team's recommended viability criteria for ESA-listed salmon stocks in the interior Columbia River Basin.

ID:  58 Info. Type:  ISI
Estimated Dissemination Date:  8/1/2008
Contact Person: Rebecca Rootes NOAA Locator

Date First Posted in Peer Review Agenda:  6/16/2006

Estimated Peer Review Start Date:  2/1/2007
Review type:  individual letters
Expected number of peer reviewers:  4-10
Peer reviewers will be selected by:  the agency

Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers?  no

Will there be opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed?  yes

How?  The draft report is available to the public through the NMFS Northwest Fisheries Science Center, at:  http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/trt/col/trt_ic_viability_survival.cfm

When?  NA

Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review?  no

Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review:  Population biology, demography, statistics, fisheries biology, mathematical modeling, and fish stock assessment.

Comments on Peer Review:

Charge statement:  See pg. 1 of the final peer review report at:  http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/isab/isab2008-1.htm.

Final peer review report:  http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/isab/isab2008-1.htm.