![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
FACT SHEET:
BSE and
U.S. Measures to Prevent its Introduction Into the United States
The recent FDA actions concerning the cattle herd in Texas that was inadvertently fed meat and bone meal generated a number of questions. For the benefit of a wider audience, answers to those questions are provided below. For more general information on BSE, please visit the APHIS BSE web site.
QUESTION: | Why does the United States prohibit the feeding of protein derived from mammals (bone meal and meat meal) to ruminants? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | FDA regulations are intended to prevent the establishment and amplification of BSE in the United States through feed and thereby minimize any risk to animals and humans. FDA regulations focus on animal feed ingredients because epidemiologic evidence gathered in the United Kingdom suggests an association between an outbreak of a ruminant TSE, specifically BSE, and the feeding to cattle of protein derived from sheep infected with scrapie, another TSE. The BSE in cattle in the U.K. was amplified through the feeding of meat-and-bone meal derived from carcasses of cattle infected with BSE. BSE has not been diagnosed in the United States, and the FDA prohibition is intended to prevent the establishment and spread of BSE in the United States through feed and thereby minimize any risk to animals and humans. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | When was the prohibition put into place? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | This prohibition has been in place since June 5, 1997. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | What was the reason for quarantining the cattle herd in Texas? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | Reports on January 25 and 26, 2001, indicate that a Texas feed mill inadvertently mixed in meat and bone meal derived from U.S. cattle with a feed supplement which later was fed to cattle. This was in violation of the feed prohibition imposed by FDA. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | Is there concern the herd contracted BSE? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | No. There is NO disease (BSE) associated with this situation. No case of BSE has been found in the United States despite aggressive testing. This situation is a compliance issue, as cattle feed mixed with prohibited mammalian material is a violation of FDA regulations. It is important to note that the prohibited material was domestic in origin, fed at a very low level, and fed only once. The potential risk of BSE to these cattle is therefore exceedingly low. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | How was the violation of the feed ban identified? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | The error was noted by the feed manufacturer within hours and immediately reported to the FDA. U.S. representatives of cattle producers, feed manufacturers, renderers, processors and veterinarians have reaffirmed their commitment to effective implementation and enforcement of sound, science-based measures to prevent BSE in the United States. This episode indicates that the multi-layered safeguard system put into place is essential for protecting the food supply and that continued vigilance needs to be taken, by all concerned, to ensure these rules are followed routinely. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | How does the FDA monitor compliance with the feed ban? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | Monitoring methods include the requirement that processors must maintain records sufficient to track the materials throughout their receipt, processing, and distribution, and make these records available for inspection by the FDA. Also, feed that contains prohibited materials must be labeled "Do not feed to cattle or other ruminants." FDA inspects feed mills to assure compliance with the regulation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | Have foreign countries taken actions against U.S. exports because of the situation in Texas? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: | No. No countries have, or should, take actions regarding this matter. It is purely a compliance issue, and does not involve any diseases. As such, countries should not impose any restrictions on U.S. products based on this incident. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QUESTION: | What are the measures taken by the U.S. Federal Government regarding BSE so far (such as regulating or prohibiting imports, invoking domestic distribution controls, animal feed use, etc.)? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANSWER: |
|
February 2, 2001
![]() |
|