Agencia para Sustancias Tóxicas y el Registro de Enfermedades (ATSDR) 
Fundamentos de evaluación 
Comunicación de riesgo a la salud

Referencias

1. Arkin E. 1991. Evaluation for risk communicators. In: Ann Fisher, Maria Pavolva, and Vincent Covello, editors. Evaluation and effective risk communications workshop proceedings. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pub. no. EPA/600/9-90/054, pgs. 17-18.
2. Arkin E. 1992. Health communications for consumers: the role of the federal government. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Housing and Consumer Interests, House Select Committee on Aging. Washington, DC, August 5, 1992.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1993. Health communication at CDC.CDC's health communication wheel. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
4. Academy for Educational Development; Johns Hopkins University; Porter/Novelli (for National AIDS Information and Education Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 1993. A workshop in developing effective educational print materials, April 1993. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development; John Hopkins University; Porter/Novelli.
5. Chess C and Hance BJ. 1992. Communicating with the public: ten questions environmental mangers should ask. New Jersey: Center for Environmental Communication, Rutgers University.
6. Chess C and McCallum DB. 1992. Needs assessment for ATSDR risk communication focus groups. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
7. Covello VT, McCallum DB, and Pavolva MT. 1989. Principles and guidelines for improving risk communication. In: Effective risk communication: the role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Covello VT, Slovic P, and von Winterfeldt D. 1987. Risk communication: a review of the literature. Draft, pgs. 5, 58-9.
9. Gatson N and Daniels P. 1988. Guidelines: writing for adults with limited reading skills. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.
10. Lum M. 1991. Benefits to conducting midcourse reviews. In: Ann Fisher, Maria Pavolva, and Vincent Covello, editors. Evaluation and effective risk communications workshop proceedings. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pub. no. EPA/600/9-90/054, pg. 97.
11. National Cancer Institute. 1992. Making health communication programs work: a planners guide. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication no. 92-1493, pgs. 64-65.
12. National Cancer Institute. 1994. Communicating the NCI mammography screening guidelines: the practicing physicians perspective. In: Tim Tinker, editor. Case studies of applied evaluation for health risk communication (workshop proceedings). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, pgs. 21-22.
13. National Research Council. 1989. Improving risk communication. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pg. 175.
14. Regan MJ and Desvousges WH. 1990. Communicating environmental risks: a guide to practical evaluations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pub. no. 230-01-91-001, pgs. 2-3.
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1986. Determining risks to health: federal policy and practice. Dover, Massachusetts: Auburn House Publishing Company.

Sección anterior