Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
 EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

Volume 10, Number 5, May 2004

Ring Vaccination and Smallpox Control

Mirjam Kretzschmar,* Susan van den Hof,* Jacco Wallinga,* and Jan van Wijngaarden†
*National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; and †Inspectorate of Health Care, the Hague, the Netherlands

 
 
Figure 5.
  Back to article
 

Figure 5. The effective reproduction number Rυ, that determines the success of intervention is shown as a function of the basic reproduction number R0 for a vaccination coverage of 50% in the casual contact ring. In A, contacts are not monitored after vaccination; in B, all identified contacts are isolated and cause further transmission. The different lines in A are for different assumptions about how long it takes to trace and vaccinate those contacts. In B, it does not make a difference whether it takes 1, 2, or 3 days to find the contacts. If R0 is 5, the intervention will be successful in both cases, if R0 is 10, 50% coverage is no longer sufficient to curb the epidemic.

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed April 20, 2004

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention