OMB Seal
Welcome to the Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Skip Main Navigation
White House Seal
OMB Home Page
White House Home Page
  Site Search     
First Blue StarSecond Blue Star Third Blue Star Fourth Blue Star
 
Printer-Friendly Version

PROGRESS IMPLEMENTING THE PRESIDENT'S MANAGEMENT AGENDA

We've raised the debate to focus on results and progress, and we're achieving great results for the American people.
President George W. Bush
May 21, 2003

Overall Status

    Almost two years after the launch of the President's Management Agenda (PMA), the federal government is in the midst of a significant transformation. By this time next year, the average federal agency will be:

  • managing personnel as a valuable resource by having hiring and development plans to fill key skill gaps and prepare for leadership succession;

  • using competition and analysis to determine the best provider of some commercial activities;

  • accounting responsibly for the people's money;

  • providing taxpayers better service through more effective and efficient use of information technology (IT); and

  • developing efficiency and outcome measures for the majority of programs to gauge performance and inform management and budget decisions.

    Prior to the establishment of the PMA, most agencies did not regularly assess the skills of their workforces relative to their needs. Nor did they have data on retention and retirement rates, much less use any of this information to make human capital decisions. Agencies did not have timely financial information and their financial statements often took more than five months to prepare. Before the PMA, only the Department of Defense (DoD) regularly held competitions to determine whether the public or private sector delivered the best value to the taxpayer when conducting commercial activities. Different agencies pursued redundant approaches to providing information to citizens on government benefits, recreation opportunities, and proposed regulations. In addition, agencies were not held accountable for the performance of their programs, and funding and management decisions rarely took performance information into account.

    Over the past two years, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has identified the five management areas it believes are most in need of improvement. OMB has worked with agencies to clarify their specific management improvement opportunities, establish accountability, develop useful management tools, demonstrate what is possible, and establish mutually agreed-upon, aggressive milestones to achieve success. The agencies are fully committed to the Management Agenda because they now realize it will help them be successful. They actively seek OMB's help in getting to where they want to be on the PMA initiatives.

    Noteworthy agency accomplishments, as well as areas that require sustained focus, are included in the Highlights of Agency Performance table, which appears later in this chapter. Some recent accomplishments include the Department of Commerce's completion of Program Assessment Rating Tools (PARTs) for programs accounting for nearly two-thirds of the Department's funding. The Department of Energy successfully removed 21 of 58 IT investments from the "at-risk" list. The Small Business Administration streamlined its human capital management by separately consolidating administrative functions for loan and section 8(a) government-procurement programs, thereby reducing processing times and overhead costs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) developed a new performance appraisal system for GS–15 employees, which is linked to the agency's goals.

    This chapter has already discussed what additional accomplishments agencies are on the verge of achieving. Agencies will have made even greater management improvements within just five years. By that time, all federal agencies will be able to say their full implementation of the Management Agenda is also allowing them to:

  • evaluate and reward employees according to how well they help achieve the agency's mission;

  • professionally and routinely hold competitions to determine the best provider of commercial activities;

  • use accurate and timely financial information to make management decisions;

  • manage their IT program investments at the highest levels with over 90 percent of systems secure, over 90 percent cost and schedule adherence, and no system duplication; and

  • base the bulk of their budget and management decisions on programs' effectiveness and efficiency.

THE PRESIDENT'S MANAGEMENT AGENDA SCORECARD

    To monitor efforts in implementing the PMA, the Administration developed a simple grading system—red, yellow, and green. Each quarter, the major federal agencies receive assessments of their overall status in achieving the "standards for success"—management milestones for each of the initiatives. Because achieving these goals is challenging, and in some cases may require years, agencies also receive progress ratings for their work over the previous three months. Progress scores are based on the achievement of specific action steps and milestones identified by the agencies and OMB. The scorecard for the quarter that ended on June 30, 2003, follows this chapter. Quarterly scorecards, the standards for success, and other information on the PMA can be found at the Results.gov website.

THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE INITIATIVES

Strategic Management of Human Capital

    The Human Capital Initiative has most federal agencies developing both a vision and a roadmap for strategically managing their workforces to better accomplish their missions for the American people. Agencies are using the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework developed by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to transform key areas of human capital management:

  • getting the talent needed to get the job done;

  • ensuring continuity of competent leadership and the sharing of knowledge and experience; and

  • creating a results-oriented performance culture that defines, asks for, and rewards strong performance.

    Agencies have begun systematically identifying mission-critical occupations and competencies in the current and future workforce to ensure they have the necessary talent. They are also developing strategies to close any gaps. OPM is supporting these efforts by encouraging the strategic use of both new and existing recruitment and retention flexibilities. In addition, to help agencies build their leadership ranks, OPM is encouraging use of an accelerated selection process for Senior Executive Service (SES) positions and executing a succession-planning strategy to fill the leadership pipeline from a diverse pool of qualified applicants.

    Agencies also are working to improve their ability to keep and motivate their employees through management systems that emphasize performance. The Federal Human Capital Survey showed that only 30 percent of employees responding believe that their awards program gives them the incentive to do their best. Agency efforts to more clearly tie performance management to results will set the stage for the successful use of the Human Capital Performance Fund proposed in the 2004 Budget. This $500 million fund would allow managers to reward their highest performers with increases to their base pay when they demonstrate that their performance appraisal systems appropriately distinguish between high and low performers.

Competitive Sourcing

    The past quarter represented a break-through for the Competitive Sourcing Initiative as three agencies—DoD, the Department of Education, and OPM—were the first to improve to yellow status. Until recently, the use of competition as a management tool to determine the most cost-effective means for service delivery remained largely untested in the federal government. Although competition for commercial services has been the stated policy of the government since 1955, few civilian agencies used competitive sourcing to explore opportunities to perform their commercial functions in a more efficient fashion, primarily because the process for conducting competitions was cumbersome and lengthy. Agencies also lacked the necessary expertise to conduct competitions.

    Significant obstacles were reduced during the past few months. On May 29, 2003, OMB released the revised Circular A–76 and laid out a much improved process for conducting competitions. The new circular streamlines the competition process and reduces the time needed to complete it. The new circular also levels the playing field, making the process fairer for both the private sector and government entities involved in the competition. To achieve the greatest value for the taxpayer, the new circular eliminates the practice of direct conversions, where agencies were allowed to convert work to contractors without first considering the benefit of continued performance by the agency. The new circular also requires the designation of a responsible official to ensure sufficient expertise at the agency. Several agencies were able to make great strides in competitive sourcing: numerous competitions are currently underway and many have already been completed.

    As more agencies make progress in competitive sourcing, there will be greater opportunities for sharing experiences. The eventual goal is to make competitive sourcing a tool regularly used by managers to determine the best way to perform commercial functions. Because competitive sourcing often results in re-engineering of government processes, independent studies by the General Accounting Office (GAO) and others, as well as experience to date, show that the taxpayer benefits from competition regardless of whether the function is retained in-house or contracted out to the private sector.

Improved Financial Performance

    Over the past few months, two agencies—the Environmental Protection Agency and SSA—met all the criteria for the Improved Financial Performance Initiative. Both received unqualified opinions on their financial statements, have financial systems compliant with federal law, and are free of repeat material weaknesses cited by auditors. Most importantly, they have demonstrated that they use accurate and timely financial information to manage their organizations. Both these agencies earned a green status score this quarter.

    All agencies are revamping the processes they use to prepare their financial statements. While Treasury and SSA were able to close their books in 45 days this past year, two years in advance of the government-wide goal, almost half of all others are on track to meet this deadline for their 2003 statements, one year in advance of the goal. An important building block that enables agencies to close their books earlier is the preparation of interim quarterly financial statements which, for the first time, all agencies have produced.

    The reduction of erroneous payments is integral not only to sound financial management, but to program integrity. To date, the initiative to reduce erroneous payments has shown that in programs making about $900 billion in payments, erroneous payments exceed $35 billion annually. In May 2003, OMB issued guidance for measuring, reducing, and recovering erroneous payments to implement the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002. With implementation of this law, the Administration will be providing scrutiny to every dollar the government spends as a way to ensure taxpayer dollars are paid properly.

Expanded Electronic Government

    The Expanded Electronic Government Initiative is using IT to provide services to the taxpayer in more convenient and efficient ways. Various E-Gov projects were launched over the past few months, including:

  • The Small Business One-Stop Compliance Project, which aims to reduce the paperwork burden on small businesses by providing compliance assistance and on-line transactions;

  • IRS' Free File Website that allowed over 2.4 million people for the first time to file their taxes on line for free; and

  • GeoData.gov that promotes collaboration and streamlining among government programs by establishing a new public gateway to maps and related data.

    The President's E-Gov initiatives aim to make government more responsive to its citizens. They also aim to reduce redundant, wasteful spending by consolidating multiple citizen service projects into single solutions.

    In an effort to make the federal government a smarter buyer of commercial software, the Administration has created the SmartBUY (Software Managed and Acquired on the Right Terms) initiative. SmartBUY enterprise software agreements will consolidate the purchasing power of the federal government by focusing these volume requirements to obtain optimal pricing and preferred terms and conditions for widely used commercial software. SmartBUY will give the government lower prices, while vendors get higher sales volume at lower cost due to the simplified approach to dealing with federal customers.

    Agencies also continue to make strides in improving their internal IT management by strengthening the business cases they use to justify IT spending, ensure that projects are well managed, and improving system security. Today, 60 percent of the government's IT systems have sufficient security in place. By July 2004, we expect 80 percent of the government's IT systems to be secure.

Budget and Performance Integration

    While the 2004 President's Budget included an unprecedented amount of performance information, such as ratings for 234 federal programs, it represented only the first installment of program accountability for achieving results. Using the PART, OMB and agencies are currently working to rate an additional 20 percent of federal programs so that the information from those ratings can be considered in the development of the 2005 Budget. For programs rated in the 2004 Budget, agencies are implementing the recommendations that resulted from the PART with the ultimate goal of improving program effectiveness and efficiency. The overall plan remains to rate an additional 20 percent of federal programs each year until all programs are systematically evaluated on an annual basis.

    Central to this initiative is ensuring that performance measures and other information from the PART will be used to support and explain budget requests. Funding requests should be based on an expected level of performance. Toward this end, agencies are working to develop useful, informative performance measures, including better measures of program efficiency. They are also preparing "performance budgets"—funding proposals that are based on anticipated results—which they will submit to OMB in the fall.

Agency Performance

    As mentioned earlier, each quarter agencies are rated on their status and progress in implementing the PMA. It is important to note that overall progress on the Agenda is comprised of individual agency achievements. The accompanying table provides a summary of the accomplishments of note for each agency rated in the scorecard. The table also identifies areas that present challenges and are therefore receiving additional attention and focus.

HIGHLIGHTS OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE
By Agency

ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF NOTE AREAS OF FOCUS

    Agriculture
  • Analyzed skills needs and deficiencies of mission-critical personnel positions.
  • Initiated 13 A–76 competitions involving IT support and maintenance activities.
  • Developed and published a new strategic plan that reduces the number of performance measures and increases the focus on outcomes.
  • Development and implementation of workforce restructuring plans for all departmental agencies.
  • Adequate follow-up to programs rated Results Not Demonstrated with the PART.
  • Remediation of IT security weaknesses.
  • Development of long-term agency plans for competitive sourcing.
    Commerce
  • Deployed improved Export.gov website, a unified portal providing access to all the export-related assistance and market information offered by the federal government.
  • Improved the strategic plan by more clearly aligning bureau activities with the Department's strategic goals.
  • Completed PARTs for programs accounting for nearly two-thirds of the Department's funding.
  • Establishment of infrastructure for competitive sourcing to ensure stronger oversight and coordination at the Department level, including bureau level implementation.
  • Strengthening information technology security.
  • Improvement of performance measures, including measures of unit costs, to better demonstrate program outcomes and efficiency.
    Defense
  • Completed a comprehensive business enterprise architecture for all DoD business activities.
  • Developed a balanced performance management scorecard that leadership will use to evaluate program and budget decisions.
  • Completed competitions involving nearly 68,000 commercial positions.
  • Implementation of its business enterprise architecture
  • Personnel succession planning and professional development to provide continuity of leadership and knowledge.
  • Shortening of the time it takes to complete public-private competitions.
    Education
  • Received first clean audit opinion since 1997.
  • Increased to 88 percent the number of citizen-government transactions that can be completed electronically.
  • Initiated competitions in human resources and payment processing activities.
  • Certification and accreditation of IT systems security.
  • Resolution of remaining financial management material weakness identified by independent auditor.
  • Development of meaningful outcome and efficiency measures and appropriate data collection strategies.
    Energy
  • Initiated certification programs for contract and project management to address competency development needs; using buyout authority to assist restructuring efforts.
  • Received clean audit opinion on 2002 financial statements and resolved two (of four) 2001 reportable conditions.
  • Improved IT security and removed 21 of 58 information technology investments from the "at-risk" list.
  • Follow-up to programs rated Results Not Demonstrated in 2004 PART evaluations.
  • Development of performance-based budget justification materials for 2005.
  • Use of the Research and Development Investment Criteria to analyze program benefits and inform 2005 funding allocations.
    EPA
  • Established an integrated financial management and performance information system for managers to use in daily decision-making.
  • Continued to improve calculation of social costs to give a more comprehensive view of the impact of its regulatory programs.
  • Development of a human resources management accountability system that includes performance measures to assess the results of human capital strategies.
  • Development of performance measures useful in assessing program effectiveness.
  • Realignment of organization to better develop more comprehensive competitive sourcing strategies.
    HHS
  • Developed the E-Find component of the E-Grants project (Fedgrants.gov), a site where potential grantees can search for grant opportunities.
  • Completed the E-Grants electronic grant application prototype and began testing in July 2003.
  • Completed nine competitive sourcing cost comparisons since January 2003 involving more than 100 positions in library services, graphic arts, TV studios, clerical support and IT functions.
  • Developed and implemented SES performance-based employment contracts that link to program outputs and outcomes.
  • Measurement of erroneous payments in key programs, identifying causes for erroneous payments, and taking appropriate action to reduce them.
  • Assessment of the performance outcomes produced by human capital reforms.
    Homeland
  • Established a comprehensive Investment Review Board process to evaluate major IT acquisitions and monitor implementation.
  • Launched effort to design a contemporary Human Resource Management System to implement the human resource flexibilities included in the Homeland Security Act.
  • Launched a comprehensive five-year program and budget planning process.
  • Development of a strategic plan and budget request that links goals, objectives, strategies and measures to resources.
  • Effective implementation of the Human Resource Management System.
  • Development of a corporate financial management system that will integrate the more than 20 legacy financial systems.
  • Development of an enterprise architecture that includes a plan to integrate existing and new mission information technology systems.
    HUD
  • Received an unqualified audit opinion on its 2002 financial statements for the third consecutive year.
  • Accelerated completion of the 2002 financial audit and reduced or combined the number of material internal control weaknesses from five to three.
  • Updated and strengthened policies and procedures for the administrative control of funds for the first time in 20 years, and trained 250 staff on principles of appropriations law.
  • Developed rigorous business cases for all major information technology systems and halted work on systems that do not pass this standard.
  • Development of plan to address workforce skill gaps and deficiencies.
  • Implementation of competitive sourcing studies to identify the most cost effective option for service delivery.
  • Elimination of four reportable conditions noted in the 2002 audit.
  • Use of performance goals to guide development and presentation of the budget for 2005.
    Interior
  • Developed and initiated a Department-wide recruiting strategy.
  • Established the enterprise architecture to support financial management business processes.
  • Completed seven Activity-Based Costing (ABC) pilots and awarded contract to fully implement ABC in two more bureaus.
  • Implementation of 2004 PART recommendations.
  • Development and use of enterprise architecture.
    Justice
  • Developed a format for its 2005 budget that will use performance to justify the budget request.
  • Initiated competitions covering 15 percent of its commercial positions including 140 FBI automotive mechanics.
  • Finalized performance management policy, which links performance to agency mission and employees' financial recognition.
  • Implementation of state-of-the-art IT systems such as the FBI's Trilogy project and development of an enterprise architecture.
  • Development and implementation of performance measures that are useful in assessing the results of law enforcement and anti-drug activities.
    Labor
  • Implemented two leadership development programs, including an MBA Fellows Program.
  • Advanced restructuring/delayering plans through consolidations and closure of small offices.
  • Held National Unemployment Insurance Integrity Conference to discuss effective ways to improve detection, prevention, and recovery of erroneous payments.
  • Expanded GovBenefits.gov to supply eligibility information for citizens on 417 federal assistance programs.
  • Identification of metrics to gauge results of human capital management.
  • Development of cost models that define the relationship between the significant outputs of major programs and the related costs.
  • Identification of functions suitable for competition as a means of ensuring cost-effective service provision.
    State
  • Coordinated with AID to draft a joint strategic plan reflecting the shared missions of the two agencies.
  • Developed a security construction cost sharing proposal to allocate costs among agencies that use embassies to accelerate building of secure embassies and promote rightsizing of overseas presence.
  • Rolled out the Regional Financial Management System in 78 percent of its posts.
  • Completed global deployment of secure sensitive but unclassified network, connecting 43,570 desktops, at domestic locations and more than 250 overseas posts providing users with Internet connectivity.
  • Establishment of competitive sourcing infrastructure.
  • Security certification and accreditation of a significant number of IT systems.
  • Development of efficiency mesures for programs.
  • Collaboration with AID to develop, by the end of 2005, a single financial management system software application.
    DOT
  • Implemented a Department-wide leadership succession planning strategy and piloted a mentoring program for emerging leaders.
  • Used performance information to justify budget requests to show how resources impact results.
  • Continued implementation of a department-wide capital planning and control process and enterprise architecture to manage IT investments.
  • Launched one of the largest public-private competitions in the federal government, studying flight service stations nationwide.
  • Keeping competitive sourcing efforts on track.
  • Timely deployment of the Delphi accounting system.
  • Removal of IT business cases from the "at risk" category.
    Treasury
  • Identified key positions and competencies for personnel succession planning.
  • Accelerated competitive sourcing by completing studies on 290 FTEs one to three months earlier than originally planned.
  • Improved capital planning and investment process by preparing better business cases to support IT investments.
  • Began implementing PART recommendations and justifying budget requests based on PART findings.
  • Linking of individual performance, accountability to program and business results.
  • Finalization of plans to resolve three material weaknesses at IRS that are now expected to take longer to correct than previously reported.
  • Development of new IRS 2005 budget structure and identification of appropriate outcome goals for the IRS.
    VA
  • Submitted legislative pay package on revised pay system for the department's physicians and dentists.
  • Resolved three material weaknesses reported in the 2001 financial statements.
  • Restructured VA budget to align accounts with programs and clarify the relationship between funding and performance.
  • Legal authority to use competition to improve cost effectiveness in service provision.
  • Resolution of remaining material weaknesses and compliance of financial systems
  • Additional work on sharing of VA/DoD medical care facilities and other resources.
    AID
  • Coordinated with State Department to draft a joint strategic plan reflecting the shared missions of the two agencies.
  • Received a qualified opinion or better on all of its financial statements.
  • Developed a budget allocation model that looks at country performance for use in 2005 Budget formulation.
  • Initiated a comprehensive workforce analysis as a first step towards completing a human capital strategy.
  • Establishment of competitive sourcing infrastructure and plans.
  • Roll-out strategy and deployment of the financial management system to the missions.
  • Collaboration with State Department to develop, by the end of 2005, a single financial management system software application.
  • Identification of mission critical competencies and development of success plan to close gaps.
    Corps of Engineers
  • Completed staff guide and launched website for coaching, counseling, and mentoring.
  • Obtained system information security certification under DoD accreditation procedures for six projects.
  • Launched an employment website.
  • Establishment of competitive sourcing as a management tool to achieve cost effective service delivery.
  • Ensuring that agency's IT enterprise architecture uses the same structure as the federal enterprise architecture.
  • Development of plan to establish national centers of expertise to improve project study efforts.
  • Action plan for correction of financial statement deficiencies identified by the DoD Inspector General.
    GSA
  • Completed workforce skills gap analyses and developed plans to close the gaps for realty and IT positions.
  • Reoriented enterprise architecture to have a more business driven approach and to support information technology capital planning.
  • Developed an agency-wide enterprise-wide Customer Relationship Management system.
  • Implemented an integrated financial and performance reporting system.
  • Development of performance measures to track the progress of human capital improvement efforts.
  • Linking of managers and supervisor performance appraisals to agency's mission, goals, and outcomes.
  • Development of long-term performance goals which are measurable and outcome-oriented.
    NASA
  • Justified its budget request with performance data and presented the full cost of achieving performance goals for the first time.
  • Initiated programs to expand leadership development opportunities and to create mentoring relationships between experts and future project leaders.
  • Reformed IT capital planning, investment control, and reporting; is aligning IT investment processes with agency program/project processes.
  • Response to the conditions that prompted material weakness findings in the 2002 audit.
  • Formulation of quantifiable, meaningful, and comparable performance metrics.
  • Development and implementation of a competitive sourcing strategy.
    NSF
  • Defined baseline enterprise architecture for NSF's two principal business functions, merit review and award management.
  • Received an unqualified audit of its financial statements for 2002.
  • Revised strategic plan to establish framework for integrating budget and performance.
  • Development and implementation of human capital plan, which will be integrated with NSF's review of business processes and technologies.
  • Development of a competitive sourcing strategy based on new human capital plan.
  • Establishment of full cost accounting.
    OPM
  • Implemented agency-wide restructuring.
  • Implemented the E-Training website (golearn.gov); 60 federal agencies now use the site to help train the federal workforce.
  • Established intra-agency program evaluation team and is developing a strategic evaluation plan.
  • Competitively sourced 104 FTEs performing financial systems support and computer operations, facilities maintenance, and tele-services. Standard competition underway for nationwide test administration program performed by 180 FTEs.
  • Revision of human capital plan to reflect new strategic plan and agency reorganization.
  • Auditor's opinion on the Revolving Fund financial statement; appropriate financial reporting for Revolving Fund.
  • Development of appropriate performance measures and follow-up to programs rated Results Not Demonstrated using the PART.
    SBA
  • Streamlined human capital management by separately consolidating administrative functions for loan and section 8(a) government-procurement programs, to reduce processing times and overhead costs.
  • Improved strategic plan by including long-term outcome-oriented goals.
  • Improved modeling of credit program subsidy costs, which is central to SBA's sound financial management and budgeting.
  • Use of information technology to improve efficiencies in human resources management and customer service.
  • Use of competitive sourcing to improve cost-effectiveness in the administration of the Disaster Loan program.
  • Development of the agency's enterprise architecture and keeping the Business Compliance One-Stop E-Gov initiative on track.
  • Improvement of outcome and efficiency measures, including development of standard efficiency measures across functions.
    Smithsonian
  • Implemented on-line computer security awareness training system.
  • Development of competitive sourcing plans and procedures.
  • Continued progress in IT security.
  • Development of a human capital strategy.
    SSA
  • Integrated financial and performance management systems, so that financial and performance information is considered when making management decisions
  • Developed a new performance appraisal system for GS-15 employees, which is linked to agency's goals.
  • Established a competitive sourcing infrastructure that includes cross-component workgroups and a comprehensive communication plan.
  • Implementation of competitive sourcing as a management practice to ensure cost-effective service delivery.
  • Monitoring of electronic disability benefit system due to significance to agency operations.
  • Identification of consistent key performance measures for all documents that can be used to demonstrate program results and justify funding requests.

SPECIFIC PROGRAM INITIATIVES

    The PMA also includes eight initiatives that are program-specific. Quarterly ratings are also prepared for the program initiatives.

Faith-Based and Community Initiative

    The Faith-Based and Community Initiative is designed to identify and remove improper federal barriers to the full participation of faith-based and community organizations in the provision of social services. In December, Presidential Executive Order 13280 created Centers for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives at AID and the Department of Agriculture, raising to seven the number of Centers that have been established. In order to track the participation of Faith-Based/Community-Based Organizations (FBO/CBOs) in these programs, the agencies have begun including a survey in the grant application packages sent out to interested groups. This year's data collection will establish benchmark levels, and next year's data will provide a basis for determining whether progress has met expectations.

    The Compassion Capital Fund demonstration program, administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has funded 21 intermediaries to provide technical assistance and sub-awards to small FBO/CBOs. Similarly, the Department of Labor will hold a technical assistance conference in early August to assist last year's intermediary grantees as well as intermediary grantees for 2003 and 2004 in their efforts to build the capacity of small FBO/CBOs.

    The Department of the Interior also took a significant step to end what has been a discriminatory double-standard applied to religious properties. As a result, historically significant treasures that are also used for religious purposes will now be eligible to receive historic preservation grants. In May, the Old North Church of Boston received the first such grant under the Save America's Treasures Historic Preservation Fund.

Privatization of Military Housing

    DoD is tackling the problems of inadequate military housing by demolishing dilapidated units, renovating existing homes, and building new ones. Increasingly, DoD relies on the private sector, which has demonstrated expertise in the management of real property and can improve the quality of DoD-owned housing at less cost and more quickly than the federal government. Prior to 2001, DoD had privatized only 4,744 units. Under this Administration's privatization initiative, DoD has accelerated and expanded its efforts, having privatized 32,731 units to date, three quarters of which were considered inadequate before being privatized. DoD plans to privatize an additional 18,000 units in 2003 and another 51,000 units in 2004.

Better Research and Development (R&D) Investment Criteria

    The goal of this initiative is to develop objective criteria that R&D agencies will use to select, fund, and manage their R&D programs. The initiative's status score reflects the limited progress most agencies have made in the government-wide implementation of the initiative. The progress score indicates that the initiative has gained momentum, and more of the R&D agencies are using the criteria to assess their programs, in part due to the improved alignment of the R&D investment criteria with the R&D PART for program-level assessments. Twelve of the top 13 R&D agencies are using the R&D PART to assess their programs this year, up from seven last year. As the first agency to test the R&D criteria, the Department of Energy's (DOE's) applied R&D programs have made the most progress in using the criteria to guide budget allocation decisions. DOE has committed to expand its use of the R&D investment criteria to manage programs and develop better ways to estimate and communicate the benefits of its R&D.

Elimination of Fraud and Error in Student Aid Programs and Deficiencies in Financial Management

    The Education Department (ED) has made significant strides in strengthening its management of federal student aid programs. Most notably, ED improved the reliability and timeliness of its financial data, achieving its first clean audit opinion since 1997. To help reduce fraud and error, ED is now changing the way it uses program and financial data to better target and eliminate areas of risk within student aid programs. Specifically, ED has employed data mining techniques to flag risky schools for additional analyses and program reviews. In addition, ED has modified its audit process to obtain more timely and detailed financial information from schools in an electronic format. Like the Department's data mining efforts, the modified audit process (or "EZ audit") allows ED to more quickly identify and address fraud and error occurring at postsecondary institutions. In order to track its progress on these efforts, ED is developing baseline and target metrics for its school compliance and oversight activities. Even with this progress, many challenges remain, such as the resolution of the remaining material weakness identified by the independent financial auditor.

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Management and Performance

    During the remainder of 2003, the Department will further improve living conditions for assisted families by providing incentives to the managers of HUD-assisted housing to prevent physical problems, not just to correct problems. HUD will protect borrowers from fraud by publishing a rule to hold Federal Housing Administration (FHA) lenders accountable for the performance of appraisers, and will create a performance measure to track its efforts to combat fraud-related problems in FHA, relative to the number of loans identified as at-risk.

    Although some subsidized families still reside in poorly maintained housing, the Department continued to make gains toward improving living conditions for assisted families. HUD took aggressive action that will achieve better quality housing for residents of substandard public housing in Puerto Rico and New Orleans. In addition, HUD made progress to reduce meaningless compliance burdens for the state and local governments that receive its block grants by reaching agreement with 25 communities to test alternatives to its consolidated planning requirements. Although some rent-subsidized households still receive erroneous subsidies, HUD took steps to ensure fairness by developing legislation with HHS to verify electronically the wage data of subsidized tenants. The bill has been introduced in Congress as H.R. 1030. To improve the integrity of rent calculations, HUD performed over 350 reviews at public housing authorities.

Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives

    In 2001 and 2002, HHS kicked off three new demonstration initiatives: Health Insurance Flexibility and Accountability (HIFA), Pharmacy Plus, and Independence Plus demonstrations. These initiatives encourage states to increase and improve health insurance coverage through currently available Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Program funding. To date, the Administration has approved eight HIFA, six Pharmacy Plus, and six Independence Plus demonstrations, including one Pharmacy Plus demonstration and one Independence Plus demonstration since January 2003. Future challenges include approving demonstrations consistent with Administration principles and completing the evaluation designed by the Urban Institute to measure the impact of HIFA waivers on the level of uninsured.

A "Right-sized" Overseas Presence

    The Rightsizing Initiative was designed to make sure that the right people from the appropriate government agencies are working in overseas posts so that agencies can be most effective at promoting U.S. foreign policy goals. The initiative also has the goal of assuring safe and secure environments for overseas employees. The State Department, in collaboration with OMB, has devoted great time and effort in the development of a capital security cost sharing proposal, which will accelerate the construction of secure embassies overseas. More importantly, this will mandate that all agencies with staff overseas pay their fair share of the actual cost of having those staff overseas. Starting with the 2005 Budget, all agencies will be required to provide a share of the funding for the cost of secure embassy construction and thereby more accurately weigh the costs and benefits of locating employees overseas.

    The State Department, in close consultation with OMB also moved to establish a regional "rightsized" presence in Frankfurt at a former U.S. Army hospital. This will consolidate and make more efficient the Europe and Eurasia Bureaus' deployment of resources. An interagency group is considering four issues central to this initiative: a common basis for calculating the cost of overseas employees; a common rightsizing methodology, based on GAO's work in this area; an examination of overseas staffing procedures and authorities; and reinforcing the annual process for reporting overseas staff, costs, and new positions. By making the costs of overseas staffing transparent, the initiative aims to put in place a more rigorous decision-making process for determining when staff are stationed overseas.

Coordination of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Defense Programs and Systems

    The increased coordination of VA and DoD health care delivery is a top Presidential priority to improve health care services to military service members, their dependents and veterans, and to achieve cost savings. The VA/DoD Executive Council, co-chaired by the VA Deputy Secretary and DoD Under Secretary, created several subgroups to look at different dimensions of this issue, including IT, facilities, and long-range planning. The Departments coordinated on IT by identifying opportunities for systems consolidation. Progress has been made in developing a VA/DoD interoperable electronic health record system to provide better care with less duplication of unneeded services. The system will be operational by 2005. VA is also planning to use DoD's enrollment system so that the transition from active duty to veteran status becomes seamless. VA and DoD are working together on capital planning and on VA's process to move services and facilities to areas where veterans now live. Finally, the Departments are developing performance standards to evaluate program efforts.

Executive Branch Management Scorecard

Executive Branch Program Initiatives Scorecard

Previous Table of Contents Next