Southern Research Station

Title: Relative Suitability of Virginia Pine and Loblolly Pine as Host Species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Author: Veysey, Jessica S.; Ayres, Matthew P.; Lombardero, Maria J.; Hofstetter, Richard W.; Klepzig, Kier D.

Date: 2003

Source: Environ. Entomol. 32(3): 668-679 (2003)

Description: Dendroctonus frontalis is a major disturbance agent in American pine forests, but attack preferences for various host species, and their relative suitability for reproduction, are poorly knowi). We studied patterns of beetle attack and reproduction during an infestation of stands contairiing Virginia pine and lol~lolly pine. Nearly all Virginia pine were attacked and killed, whcrcas n third of the loblolly pine escaped attack. Among attacked trees, the density of landings and attacks on Virginia pine was 56-106% higher than on loblolly pint at one site, whcrcas it was similar between species at another site. Paradoxically, D. frontalis preferred the host that was least suitable for reproduction: mean ±SE = 0.89 ± 0.33 versus 4.65 ± 1.40 progeny attack in Virginia pine versus loblolly pine. Poor reproduction in Virginia pine was attributable to increased adult mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased larval survival. Phloem thickness and nitrogen content were similar between the two pine species. Loblolly pine was significantly more suitable for the growth of Ophiostoma minus, a fungal associate of D. frontalis. Resin flow was lower in Virginia pine than in loblolly pine. although oleoresin chemistry may partly explain poor reproduction in Virginia pine. A simulation motlcl prcdictctl that beetle inftdations will tend to collapse within stands dominated by Virginia pine, and that increasing availalility of loblolly pines will promote infestation growth. Because of beetle preferences, forests that contain even modest proportions of Virginia pine relative to loblolly pine may be less likely to sustain betIe infestations. Management of species composition may provide a means for mitigating the undesirable impacts of this herbivore in pine forests.

Keywords: forest management, host selection. secondary attraction, olcoresin, population dynamics

View and Print this Publication (1.4 MB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.8 MB)

Publication Notes: 

• We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
• This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Veysey, Jessica S.; Ayres, Matthew P.; Lombardero, Maria J.; Hofstetter, Richard W.; Klepzig, Kier D.  2003.  Relative Suitability of Virginia Pine and Loblolly Pine as Host Species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).   Environ. Entomol. 32(3): 668-679 (2003)