PandemicFlu.gov - AvianFlu.gov
 

Font Size Reduce Text Size  Enlarge Text Size     Print Send this page to printer     Download Reader  Download PDF reader

Use of Pneumococcal Vaccines for Influenza Pandemic Preparedness

Topics on this Page


Introduction

Influenza predisposes individuals to bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. During previous pandemics, secondary bacterial pneumonia has been an important cause of morbidity and mortality1-3 with 7-20 percent of persons with influenza infection during 1918-1919 developing secondary bacterial pneumonia, depending on the population and the phase of the pandemic4-6. Attack rates of secondary bacterial pneumonia during the less severe 20th century pandemics are less well-documented but are thought to be lower, perhaps five percent. Among those who acquired secondary bacterial pneumonia during pandemics, 20-36 percent died7.

In virtually all published series, Streptococcus pneumoniae has been the most common etiology of secondary bacterial pneumonia, accounting for 25-75 percent of cases3,6,8-15. Severe pneumococcal pneumonia associated with inter-pandemic influenza has also been described16. The biological basis for the influenza-pneumococcus association is likely related to the neuraminidase activity of individual influenza A virus subtypes17.

A key difference between previous influenza pandemics and the next one is the widespread availability in the United States of two pneumococcal vaccines. An important question is whether these vaccines could be used to prevent secondary pneumococcal pneumonia.

Effectiveness and public health impact of pneumococcal vaccines against pneumococcal pneumonia

A growing body of literature suggests that the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) can prevent both invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal pneumonia caused by serotypes included in the vaccine. In clinical trials, 7- and 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have been shown to be 20-37 percent effective against radiographically-confirmed pneumonia among young children18-21. In studies using active, population-based surveillance to evaluate the impact of PCV7 in the U.S., rates of all invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) among children aged less than five years have declined by 75 percent while rates caused by PCV7-serotypes have declined by 98 percent22; approximately 20 percent of all IPD cases in this age group present with pneumonia. Routine use of PCV7 in the U.S. infant immunization program has also been shown to reduce all-cause pneumonia hospitalizations among children less than two years of age by 39 percent23. A South African trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV9) closely related to the 7-valent product showed that PCV9 could prevent secondary pneumococcal pneumonia among children. Children who had received PCV9 experienced 55% fewer hospitalizations for laboratory-confirmed influenza infection than children who had received placebo, suggesting that the vaccine was directly preventing pneumococcal pneumonia as a complication of influenza infection24.

Although direct vaccination of adults with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has not been studied extensively, considerable evidence suggests a large public health impact of pediatric immunization on IPD among adults. Between 1998 and 2005, rates of IPD caused by PCV7 serotypes among adults declined by 75-85 percent, depending on the age group. In contrast to children where a minority of IPD manifests as pneumonia, approximately 75 percent of IPD cases among adults present as pneumonia, almost always requiring hospitalization25. These indirect effects of PCV7 vaccination of children apparently are not limited to IPD; in one study, routine use of PCV7 in children led to a 26 percent reduction in all-cause pneumonia hospitalizations among adults aged 18-39 years23.  Reductions occurred in other age groups but were not statistically significant.

While evidence for the ability of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines to prevent invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal pneumonia is mounting, evidence for effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) is limited to pneumococcal bacteremia, where published studies estimate the effectiveness to be 44%-81%26,27. The duration of protection of PPV23 may be greater than five years among persons aged less than 65 years but is probably less than five years among people aged greater than 65 years28. Importantly, evidence of effectiveness of PPV23 against pneumonia without bacteremia is lacking despite multiple studies that have looked for such an effect29.

Recommended vaccination schedules

CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends a single dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for all people 65 years and older and for persons 2 to 64 years of age with certain high-risk conditions (Table 1)30.  A single revaccination at least five years after initial vaccination is recommended for people 65 years and older who were first vaccinated before age 65 years. 

For children, four doses of PCV7 are recommended by the ACIP, one each at two, four, six, and 12 to 15 months of age, with catch-up schedules for children who start the series late or who miss doses (Table 1)31. 

Use of the pneumococcal vaccines for influenza pandemic preparedness

The ACIP is currently reviewing existing recommendations for routine use of pneumococcal conjugate and polysaccharide vaccines. At this time, there are no plans to change existing recommendations for PCV7 or PPV23 use specifically in preparation for a possible influenza pandemic.  Instead, emphasis should be placed on increasing vaccination coverage among those for whom the vaccines are already recommended. Administering pneumococcal vaccines during a pandemic may be complicated by personnel shortages due to illness and vaccine shortages due to excessive demand. Therefore, ensuring that all persons with pneumococcal vaccine indications have been vaccinated before a pandemic occurs may be the best way to prevent pneumococcal disease during a pandemic (Table 2)30,31.

Conclusion

To reduce the burden of secondary bacterial pneumonia during the next influenza pandemic, CDC urges healthcare providers and state immunization programs to improve pneumococcal vaccination delivery systems for patients under their care so that national vaccine coverage increases. The ideal time to accelerate vaccination efforts is during the inter-pandemic and pandemic alert phases (phases 1 through 3), when the threat of a pandemic is not imminent. At this time, CDC does not recommend changes to existing recommendations for use or stockpiling of pneumococcal vaccines in anticipation of a pandemic.

Table 1.  U.S. recommendations for use of pneumococcal vaccines30,31.

 

Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

Universal vaccination

Persons 65 years and older

Children <2 years of age

   

Medical Indications

Persons 2-64 years with

Children 24-59 months with

 
  • chronic cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathies)
  • chronic pulmonary disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema but excluding asthma
  • diabetes mellitus
  • alcoholism
  • chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis
  • cerebrospinal fluid leaks
  • functional or anatomic asplenia including sickle cell disease and splenectomy
  • living situations in special environments or social situations including Alaska Natives and certain American Indian populations
  • immuno-compromised conditions including HIV infection, leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, multiple myeloma, generalized malignancy, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome; or those receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy (including corticosteroids); and those who have received an organ or bone marrow transplant
  • chronic cardiac disease, particularly cyanotic congenital heart disease and cardiac failure
  • chronic pulmonary disease, excluding asthma unless on high dose corticosteroid therapy
  • diabetes mellitus
  • cerebrospinal fluid leaks
  • sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies
  • congenital or acquired asplenia or splenic dysfunction
  • renal failure and nephrotic syndrome 
  • immunocompromising conditions, including HIV; congenital B- (humoral) or T-lymphocyte immunodeficiencies; complement (c1, c2, c3, and c4) deficiencies; phagocytic disorders, excluding chronic granulomatous disease
  • diseases associated with immuno-suppressive therapy or radiation therapy, including malignant  neoplasms, leukemias, lymphomas, Hodgkin’s disease, or solid organ transplantation

Consider use of vaccine in:

 

All children 24-59 months with priority given to children aged 24-35 months, children of Alaska Native or American Indian descent, children of African-American descent, and children who attend day care centers

Table 2.  Population-based interventions to improve vaccination coverage, ranked as high priority in the Guide to Community Preventive Services32.

Increasing community demand for vaccination services:

Client recall/reminder

Multi-component interventions with education

Vaccination requirements for childcare and school attendance

Community-wide education only

Clinic-based education only

Client or family incentives

Client-held medical records

Enhancing access to vaccination services:

Reducing out-of-pocket costs

Expanding access in healthcare settings through multi-component interventions

Expanding access only in healthcare settings

Expanding access in Women, Infants, & Children (WIC) programs

Introducing home visits

Enhancing school programs

Enhancing childcare center programs

Provider-based interventions:

Provider reminder/recall

Assessment and feedback for providers

Standing orders for adults

Standing orders for children

Provider education only

References 

1. Nuzum JW, Pilot I, Stangl FH, Bonar BE. Pandemic influenza and pneumonia in a large civilian hospital. JAMA 1918;71:1562-65.

2. Robertson L, Caley JP, Moore J. Importance of Staphylococcus aureus in pneumonia in the 1957 epidemic of influenza A. Lancet 1958;2(7040):233-6.

3. Schwarzmann SW, Adler JL, Sullivan RJ, Jr., Marine WM. Bacterial pneumonia during the Hong Kong influenza epidemic of 1968-1969. Arch Intern Med 1971;127(6):1037-41.

4. Abrahams A, Hallows N, French H. A further investigation into influenza pneumococcal and influenza-streptococcal septicaemia: epidemic influenzal "pneumonia" of highly fatal type and its relation to "purulent bronchitits". Lancet 1919;1:1-11.

5. Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Hampson AW. The epidemiology and clinical impact of pandemic influenza. Vaccine 2003;21(16):1762-8.

6. Soper GA. The pandemic in the Army camps. JAMA 1918;72:1899-1909.

7. Brundage JF. Interactions between influenza and bacterial respiratory pathogens: implications for pandemic preparedness. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6(5):303-12.

8. Blanton WB, Irons EE. A recent epidemic of acute respiratory infection at Camp Custer, Mich. JAMA 1918;71:1988-91.

9. Brem WV, Bolling GE, Casper EJ. Pandemic influenza and secondary pneumonia at Camp Fremont, Calif. JAMA 1918;71:2138-44.

10. Ely CF, Lloyd BJ, Hitchcock CD, Nickson DH. Influenza as seen at the Puget Sound Navy Yard. JAMA 1919;72:24-28.

11. Fry J. Influenza A (Asian) 1957: Clinical and Epidemiological Features in a General Practice. British Medical Journal 1958;2:259-261.

12. Hall JN, Stone MC, Simpson JC. The epidemic of pneumonia following influenza at Camp Logan, Texas. JAMA 1918;71:1986-87.

13. Hirsch EF, McKinney M. Epidemic of bronchopneumonia at Camp Grant, Ill. JAMA 1918;71:1735-36.

14. Petersdorf RG, Fusco JJ, Harter DH, Albrink WS. Pulmonary infections complicating Asian influenza. AMA Arch Intern Med 1959;103(2):262-72.

15. Spooner LH, Scott LH, Heath EH. A bacteriologic study of the influenza epidemic at Camp Devens, Mass. JAMA 1919;72:155-159.

16. O'Brien KL, Walters MI, Sellman J, et al. Severe pneumococcal pneumonia in previously healthy children: the role of preceding influenza infection. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30(5):784-9. Epub 2000 May 18.

17. McCullers JA. Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19(3):571-82.

18. Black S, Shinefield H, Fireman B, et al. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. Northern California Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19(3):187-95.

19. Cutts FT, Zaman SM, Enwere G, et al. Efficacy of nine-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in The Gambia: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365(9465):1139-46.

20. Hansen J, Black S, Shinefield H, et al. Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than 5 years of age for prevention of pneumonia: updated analysis using World Health Organization standardized interpretation of chest radiographs. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25(9):779-81.

21. Klugman KP. A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with and those without HIV infection.[see comment]. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2003;7 Suppl 1:S27-31.

22. Moore M, Pilishvili T, Thomas A, et al. Geographic Trends in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease caused by Nonvaccine Serotypes. Infectious Diseases Society of America 44th Annual Meeting 2006, Toronto, Canada.

23. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Arbogast PG, Martin SW, Edwards KM, Griffin MR. Decline in pneumonia admissions after routine childhood immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the USA: a time-series analysis. Lancet 2007;369(9568):1179-86.

24. Madhi SA, Klugman KP. A role for Streptococcus pneumoniae in virus-associated pneumonia. Nat Med 2004;10(8):811-3.

25. Lexau CA, Lynfield R, Danila R, et al. Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among older adults in the era of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. JAMA 2005;294(16):2043-51.

26. Butler JC, Breiman RF, Campbell JF, Lipman HB, Broome CV, Facklam RR. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine efficacy. An evaluation of current recommendations. JAMA 1993;270(15):1826-31.

27. Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Yu O, et al. Effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348(18):1747-55.

28. Shapiro ED, Berg AT, Austrian R, et al. The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1991;325(21):1453-60.

29. Dear K, Holden J, Andrews R, Tatham D. Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(4):CD000422.

30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of pneumococcal disease. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1997;46(RR-8):1-20.

31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young children: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2000;49(No. RR-9):1-35.

32. Briss PA, Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Zaza S. Developing and using the Guide to Community Preventive Services: lessons learned about evidence-based public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2004;25:281-302.