US Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Southern Research Station

 
 

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

USA.gov  Government Made Easy

Publication Information

Title: Forest Growth and Yield Models Viewed From a Different Perspective

Author: Goelz, Jeffery C.

Date: 2002

Source: Math, Modeling and Sci. Comuting. 13(3-4): 177-189.

Description: Typically, when different forms of growth and yield models are considered, they are grouped into convenient discrete classes. As a heuristic device, I chose to use a contrasting perspective, that all growth and yield models are diameter distribution models that merely differ in regard to which diameter distribution is employed and how the distribution is projected to future conditions. I describe different diameter distributions, whether they are the classical contmuous diameter distributions, the implied distributions of whole-stand models, or the discrete diameter distributions of size-class or individual tree models. There are also intermediates between these types of diameter distributions. Aggregation vs. disaggregation describes the alternate poles for how diameter distributions can be projected to future conditions. There are intermediates between these extremes, as well. There are several alternatives that vary from the classical paradigms. One alternative is a continuous analog to stand table projection that employs a "distribution modifying function" to project diameter distributions in time. One discrete variant of stand table projection is termed "non-naWe" size class models, as they relax one or more of the assumptions of size class models. An "individual tree kernel" model is one that uses a simple kernel function to distribute probability around an individual tree, rather than concentrate the probability at the measured diameter, as in typical individual tree models. Other variants are mentioned. These variants suggest that there is an infiite universe of alternative growth and yield models, and the classic labels for types of growth and yield models do not embrace these alternatives.

Keywords: 

View and Print this Publication (360 KB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.4 MB)

Publication Notes: 

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Goelz, Jeffery C.  2002.  Forest Growth and Yield Models Viewed From a Different Perspective.   Math, Modeling and Sci. Comuting. 13(3-4): 177-189.

US Forest Service - Research & Development
Last Modified:  January 16, 2009


USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.