 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 11, Number 12, December 2005 Francisella tularensis in the United StatesJason Farlow,* David M. Wagner,* Meghan Dukerich,* Miles Stanley,*
May Chu,† Kristy Kubota,† Jeannine Petersen,† and Paul Keim* |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 2. Genetic relationships among 35 North American Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis A.II. subpopulation isolates based upon allelic differences at 24 variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) markers. County, state, and year of isolation are specified to the right of each branch or clade. G indicates number of distinct VNTR marker genotypes, triangle indicates epidemiologically linked isolate, asterisk indicates isolate with an unknown year of isolation, boxed designation indicates F. tularensis type strain B-38, and square indicates a set of genetically identical but epidemiologically unlinked isolates. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed November 16, 2005 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|