![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090122103743im_/http://www.cdc.gov/i/s.gif) |
2002 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 2—ART
Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos |
|
Explanation of Figures, Section 2: ART Cycles Using
Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos
This
page contains figures 3–13 of Section 2A
Click on titles or images to go back to Section 2A
Figure 3
![Figure 3 text below](sectionimage/figure3lg.jpg)
Figure 3 is a bar graph
representing the outcome of ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or
embryos, by stage, 2002.
- 85,826 cycles started
- 74,519 retrievals
- 69,857 transfers
- 29,423 pregnancies
- 24,324 live-birth deliveries
Figure
4
![figure 4 text below](sectionimage/figure4lg.jpg)
Figure 4 is a
pie chart representing reasons ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or
embryos were discontinued in 2002.
- No or inadequate egg
production 84.6%
- Patient withdrew for
other reasons 10.2%
- Too-high response to
ovarian stimulation medication 4.3%
- Concurrent illness
0.9%
Figure
5
![figure 5 text below](sectionimage/figure5lg.jpg)
Figure 5 is a bar graph
representing success rates for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or
embryos, by different measures, 2002.
- Pregnancies per cycle 34.3%
- Live births per cycle 28.3%
- Live births per retrieval 32.6%
- Live births per transfer 34.8%
- Singleton live births per cycle 21.1%
- Singleton live births per transfer
22.5%
Figure
6
![Figure 6 text below](sectionimage/figure6lg.jpg)
Figure 6 is a pie chart
representing results of ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos,
2002.
- No pregnancy 65.0%
- Ectopic pregnancy 0.7%
- Clinical pregnancy 34.3%, which is
subdivided as follows:
- Single-fetus pregnancy 19.9%
- Multiple-fetus pregnancy 12.4%
- Not able to determine the number
of fetuses because the pregnancy ended in an early miscarriage
2.0%
Figure
7
![Figure 7 text below](sectionimage/figure7lg.jpg)
Figure 7 is a
pie chart representing outcomes of pregnancies resulting from ART cycles
using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, 2002.
- 82.7% of pregnancies
resulted in a live birth, subdivided as follows:
- Singleton births
53.7%
- Multiple-infant
births 29.0%
- 16.4% of pregnancies
resulted in an adverse outcome, subdivided as follows:
- Miscarriages 15.0%
- Induced abortions
0.9%
- Stillbirths 0.5%
The outcome was not
reported for 0.8% of pregnancies.
Figure 8
![Figure 8 text below](sectionimage/figure8lg.jpg)
Figure 8 consists of two pie charts, A and B, representing the risk of having a
multiple-fetus pregnancy and the risk of having a multiple-infant live
birth from ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, 2002.
- Pie chart A
represents 29,423 pregnancies
- Singletons 58.1%
- Total
multiple-fetus pregnancies 36.2%, which are subdivided as follows:
- Twins 29.4%
- Triplets or more
6.8%
- Not able to
determine the number of fetuses because the pregnancy ended in an
early miscarriage 5.7%
- Pie chart B
represents 24,324 live births
- Singletons 64.6%
- Total
multiple-infant live births 35.4%, which are subdivided as follows:
- Twins 31.6%
- Triplets or more
3.8%
Figure
9
![Figure 9 text below](sectionimage/figure9lg.jpg)
Figure 9
is a line graph representing the age
distribution of women who had ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or
embryos, 2002. Data points are as follows:
- Age 22, 0.16%
- Age 23, 0.29%
- Age 24, 0.51%
- Age 25, 0.82%
- Age 26, 1.32%
- Age 27, 1.87%
- Age 28, 2.71%
- Age 29, 3.68%
- Age 30, 5.02%
- Age 31, 6.23%
- Age 32, 6.74%
- Age 33, 7.24%
- Age 34, 7.23%
- Age 35, 7.72%
- Age 36, 7.28%
- Age 37, 7.34%
- Age 38, 7.33%
- Age 39, 7.11%
- Age 40, 5.96%
- Age 41, 5.07%
- Age 42, 3.97%
- Age 43, 2.44%
- Age 44, 1.25%
- Age 45, 0.52%
- Age 46, 0.20%
Figure 10
Figure 10 is a line graph representing
pregnancy rates, live birth rates, and singleton live birth rates for ART
cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, by age of woman, 2002. Data
points are as follows:
-
Age 22, Pregnancy
rate 38.3%, Live birth rate 33.1%, Singleton live birth rate 25.6%
-
Age 23, Pregnancy
rate 47.1%, Live birth rate 38.9%, Singleton live birth rate 26.2%
-
Age 24, Pregnancy
rate 44.8%, Live birth rate 39.5%, Singleton live birth rate 25.5%
-
Age 25, Pregnancy
rate 43.1%, Live birth rate 37.5%, Singleton live birth rate 24.2%
-
Age 26, Pregnancy
rate 42.9%, Live birth rate 38.4%, Singleton live birth rate 23.4%
-
Age 27, Pregnancy
rate 45.8%, Live birth rate 40.1%, Singleton live birth rate 23.2%
-
Age 28, Pregnancy
rate 42.9%, Live birth rate 37.5%, Singleton live birth rate 22.0%
-
Age 29, Pregnancy
rate 45.5%, Live birth rate 39.6%, Singleton live birth rate 23.8%
-
Age 30, Pregnancy
rate 42.3%, Live birth rate 36.8%, Singleton live birth rate 22.0%
-
Age 31, Pregnancy
rate 44.2%, Live birth rate 38.4%, Singleton live birth rate 22.7%
-
Age 32, Pregnancy
rate 43.0%, Live birth rate 37.5%, Singleton live birth rate 23.6%
-
Age 33, Pregnancy
rate 41.3%, Live birth rate 35.8%, Singleton live birth rate 22.4%
-
Age 34, Pregnancy
rate 39.3%, Live birth rate 33.5%, Singleton live birth rate 20.8%
-
Age 35, Pregnancy
rate 38.2%, Live birth rate 32.6%, Singleton live birth rate 20.8%
-
Age 36, Pregnancy
rate 37.4%, Live birth rate 31.1%, Singleton live birth rate 19.6%
-
Age 37, Pregnancy
rate 33.7%, Live birth rate 28.2%, Singleton live birth rate 18.9%
-
Age 38, Pregnancy
rate 31.7%, Live birth rate 24.9%, Singleton live birth rate 17.2%
-
Age 39, Pregnancy
rate 26.9%, Live birth rate 19.9%, Singleton live birth rate 14.9%
-
Age 40, Pregnancy
rate 23.0%, Live birth rate 16.1%, Singleton live birth rate 12.6%
-
Age 41, Pregnancy
rate 18.7%, Live birth rate 12.1%, Singleton live birth rate 9.7%
-
Age 42, Pregnancy
rate 15.4%, Live birth rate 9.0%, Singleton live birth rate 7.5%
-
Age 43, Pregnancy
rate 11.5%, Live birth rate 6.3%, Singleton live birth rate 6.0%
-
Age 44, Pregnancy
rate 6.7%, Live birth rate 2.6%, Singleton live birth rate 2.4%
-
Age 45, Pregnancy
rate 2.9%, Live birth rate 1.1%, Singleton live birth rate 0.9%
-
Age 46, Pregnancy
rate 2.9%, Live birth rate 0.6%, Singleton live birth rate 0.6%
Figure 11
![Figure 11 text below](sectionimage/figure11lg.jpg)
Figure 11 is a bar graph representing pregnancy rates, live birth rates, and
singleton live birth rates for ART cycles using fresh nondonor
eggs or embryos among women aged 40 and older, 2002. Note: For
consistency, all rates are based on cycles started. Data points
are as follows:
- Age 40,
Pregnancy rate 23.0%, Live birth rate 16.1%, Singleton live
birth rate 12.6%
- Age 41,
Pregnancy rate 18.7%, Live birth rate 12.1%, Singleton live
birth rate 9.7%
- Age 42,
Pregnancy rate 15.4%, Live birth rate 9.0%, Singleton live birth
rate 7.5%
- Age 43,
Pregnancy rate 11.5%, Live birth rate 6.3 %, Singleton live
birth rate 6.0%
- >Age 43,
Pregnancy rate 5.2%, Live birth rate 2.0%, Singleton live birth
rate 1.8%
Figure 12
![Figure 12 text below](sectionimage/figure12lg.jpg)
Figure 12 is a
line graph representing miscarriage rates among women who had ART
cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, by age of woman,
2002. Data points are as follows:
- Age < 25, 13.6%
- Age 25, 13.0%
- Age 26, 10.5%
- Age 27, 12.4%
- Age 28, 12.6%
- Age 29, 13.0%
- Age 30, 13.1%
- Age 31, 13.1%
- Age 32, 12.6%
- Age 33, 13.3%
- Age 34, 14.7%
- Age 35, 14.7%
- Age 36, 16.8%
- Age 37, 16.2%
- Age 38, 21.6%
- Age 39, 26.2%
- Age 40, 30.2%
- Age 41, 35.3%
- Age 42, 41.8%
- Age 43, 45.0%
- Age 44, 61.1%
- Age >44, 64.0%
Figure 13
Figure 13 is a bar
graph representing outcomes of ART cycles using fresh nondonor
eggs or embryos, by stage and age group, 2002.
- <Age 35, Retrieval
91%, Transfer 86%, Pregnancy 43%, Live birth 37%
- Age 35–37, Retrieval
87%, Transfer 83%, Pregnancy 36%, Live birth 31%
- Age 38–40, Retrieval
83%, Transfer 78%, Pregnancy 28%, Live birth 21%
- Age 41–42, Retrieval
80%, Transfer 73%, Pregnancy 17%, Live birth 11%
- >Age 42, Retrieval
76%, Transfer 65%, Pregnancy 9%, Live birth 4%
Section
1 | Section 2 |
Section
3 | Section 4 |
Section
5
Previous ART Reports
Implementation
of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992
Assisted
Reproductive Technology: Embryo Laboratory
Date last reviewed:
03/23/2006
Content source: Division
of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090122103743im_/http://www.cdc.gov/i/s.gif) |
|