Primary Navigation for the CDC Web Site
CDC en Español
Cancer Prevention and Control
divider
E-Mail Icon E-mail this page
Printer Friendly Icon Printer-friendly version
divider
 View by Topic
bullet About Us
bullet Resource Library
bullet Preventive Cancer Screening
bullet Program Contacts
bullet Partners
bullet Data
bullet Newsroom
bullet Site Map

Contact Information Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention
Division of Cancer
Prevention and Control
4770 Buford Hwy, NE
MS K-64
Atlanta, GA 30341-3717

Call: 1 (800) CDC-INFO
TTY: 1 (888) 232-6348
FAX: (770) 488-4760

E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov

Submit a Question Online

State Cancer Facts

2004 Data Quality Criteria

Incidence data from shaded states are not presented in State Cancer Facts. Mortality data from all states are presented.

Achievement of Selected Data Quality Criteria* by State and SEER Metropolitan Area Cancer Registries, 2004
Cancer Registry % Case Ascertainment % Passing Edits % DCOs§ % Missing Sex % Missing Race % Missing Age
Alabama ≥95 100.00 1.7 0.00 0.48 0.00
Alaska ≥95 100.00 1.4 0.00 1.10 0.00
Arizona 90–94 100.00 3.1 0.01 2.24 0.05
Arkansas 90–94 100.00 0.5 0.06 0.68 0.03
California ≥95 100.00 0.9 0.02 1.87 0.04
   Greater Bay ≥95 100.00 1.0 0.00 1.77 0.03
   Los Angeles ≥95 100.00 1.2 0.01 1.87 0.02
Colorado ≥95 99.97 2.5 0.00 2.61 0.01
Connecticut 90–94 100.00 1.4 0.03 0.39 0.00
Delaware ≥95 100.00 2.4 0.00 1.62 0.00
District of Columbia 90–94 100.00 2.8 0.00 2.18 0.00
Florida ≥95 100.00 2.8 0.03 0.58 0.00
Georgia ≥95 100.00 2.1 0.00 0.33 0.00
   Atlanta ≥95 100.00 1.1 0.00 0.43 0.00
Hawaii ≥95 100.00 1.4 0.00 1.95 0.00
Idaho ≥95 100.00 1.9 0.00 0.08 0.00
Illinois ≥95 100.00 1.9 0.00 2.31 0.00
Indiana ≥95 100.00 2.1 0.00 0.83 0.00
Iowa ≥95 100.00 1.4 0.01 1.87 0.00
Kansas ≥95 100.00 2.8 0.00 2.60 0.00
Kentucky ≥95 100.00 1.0 0.00 2.37 0.00
Louisiana ≥95 100.00 1.2 0.00 0.15 0.00
Maine ≥95 100.00 1.7 0.02 1.13 0.00
Maryland No data No data No data No data No data No data
Massachusetts ≥95 100.00 1.8 0.00 1.44 0.00
Michigan ≥95 99.75 1.7 0.04 2.56 0.00
   Detroit 90–94 100.00 1.0 0.00 2.24 0.00
Minnesota ≥95 99.94 2.5 0.00 4.34 0.03
Mississippi ≥95 100.00 3.7 0.00 0.48 0.00
Missouri ≥95 100.00 2.1 0.01 0.27 0.00
Montana ≥95 100.00 2.8 0.00 1.24 0.00
Nebraska ≥95 100.00 2.0 0.00 2.19 0.00
Nevada ≥95 100.00 2.5 0.00 2.14 0.02
New Hampshire ≥95 100.00 0.8 0.12 2.35 0.00
New Jersey ≥95 100.00 1.2 0.00 1.58 0.02
New Mexico ≥95 99.98 2.6 0.00 0.04 0.00
New York ≥95 100.00 0.9 0.00 1.80 0.06
North Carolina ≥95 100.00 1.0 0.02 0.29 0.00
North Dakota ≥95 100.00 0.7 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ohio 90–94 99.96 1.1 0.00 4.74 0.00
Oklahoma ≥95 100.00 2.6 0.00 0.39 0.01
Oregon ≥95 100.00 1.7 0.00 2.12 0.00
Pennsylvania ≥95 100.00 2.1 0.00 1.22 0.01
Rhode Island ≥95 99.97 2.2 0.00 2.54 0.00
South Carolina ≥95 100.00 1.9 0.01 0.54 0.00
South Dakota ≥95 99.95 4.2 0.00 0.26 0.00
Tennessee 90–94 99.99 3.9 0.00 0.65 0.01
Texas ≥95 100.00 2.9 0.00 1.66 0.00
Utah ≥95 100.00 0.2 0.00 0.01 0.00
Vermont ≥95 100.00 1.9 0.06 0.09 0.00
Virginia ≥95 100.00 3.5 0.00 1.10 0.00
Washington ≥95 100.00 1.4 0.00 2.90 0.00
   Seattle-Puget Sound ≥95 99.95 0.8 0.00 0.17 0.00
West Virginia ≥95 100.00 1.9 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wisonsin 90–94 99.99 4.7 0.01 0.82 0.00
Wyoming 90–94 100.00 0.3 0.00 4.23 0.00

Cancer incidence data included in this report are from statewide or metropolitan area cancer registries that meet the following data quality criteria for all cancer sites combined:

  • Case ascertainment is 90% or more complete.
  • No more than 5% of cases are ascertained solely on the basis of a death certificate.
  • No more than 3% of cases are missing information on sex.
  • No more than 3% of cases are missing information on age.
  • No more that 5% of cases are missing information on race.
  • At least 97% of the registry's records passed a set of core single-field, inter-field, and inter-record computerized edits.

*National Program of Cancer Registries (including California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey) data quality based on January 2006 data submission; SEER data quality based on November 2005 data submission.

Completeness of case ascertainment was estimated by methods developed by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Sources:

  • Howe HL. Conclusions of the Workgroup for High-Quality Criteria for Data Use: The NAACCR Narrative. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; 2001.
  • Tucker TC, Howe HL, Weir HK. Certification of population-based cancer registries. Journal of Registry Management 1999;26(1):24–27.

Computerized edits test the validity and logic of data components reported for selected items.

§DCOs are death certificate only cases; that is, cancer cases ascertained solely on the basis of a death certificate after the registry has completed a routine procedure known as death clearance and followback.

Greater Bay includes the San Francisco-Oakland and San Jose-Monterey registries.

SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

Date last reviewed: 12/14/2007
Date last modified: 12/14/2007
Content source: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
Safer, Healthier People

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A.
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Every Day - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
USA.govDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services