Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport. - Tabular View

This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by ^†

Tracking Information

First Received Date ^†

March 28, 2006

Last Updated Date

March 28, 2006

Start Date ^†

January 2005

Current Primary Outcome Measures ^†

Quality of CPR

Original Primary Outcome Measures ^†

Same as current

Change History

No Changes Posted

Current Secondary Outcome Measures ^†

End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER
Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate
Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital

Original Secondary Outcome Measures ^†

Same as current

Descriptive Information

Brief Title ^†

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

Official Title ^†

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine on the CPR Performance for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Ambulance Transport.

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Study Phase

Study Type ^†

Interventional

Study Design ^†

Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Condition ^†

Cardiac Arrest
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Intervention ^†

Device: Automatic CPR machine

Study Arms / Comparison Groups

Publications *

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.

Recruitment Information

Recruitment Status ^†

Recruiting

Enrollment ^†

100

Completion Date

Primary Completion Date

Eligibility Criteria ^†

Inclusion Criteria:

Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric
Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team

Exclusion Criteria:

Younger than 15 years old
Traumatic cardia arrest
Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Gender

Both

Ages

16 Years and older

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Contacts ^††

Location Countries ^†

Taiwan

Expanded Access Status

Administrative Information

NCT ID ^†

NCT00308815

Responsible Party

Secondary IDs ^††

Study Sponsor ^†

National Taiwan University Hospital

Collaborators ^††

Investigators ^†

Study Director:

Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Information Provided By

National Taiwan University Hospital

Verification Date

October 2004

^† Required WHO trial registration data element.
^†† WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.