Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Skip to content Skip to navigation

Federal Geographic Data Committee

Sections
 
Personal tools
You are here: Home Grants Interim and Final Report Formats Report Format for Framework Client Development Projects
Document Actions

Report Format for Framework Client Development Projects

Category 2: 2005, 2006, 2007

Brief documentation of the data and server configuration approach taken is required in a form, with graphics, that can be followed by others for adoption.

Agreement Number:
Indicate whether Interim or Final report
Report Date:
Organization: Name, address, web address
Project Leader: Name, telephone, email
Collaborating Organizations: Name, point of contact, address, web address

In writing the report keep in mind the goals of your project under this category: to establish, register, and maintain an operational Web Feature Service for Framework data.

Project Narrative
Summarize the project activities. Include its accomplishments, successes strengths and weaknesses, further challenges, and collaboration activities, as appropriate.

Status of your data access activities
What Framework data theme(s) will be accessed under this project?
What is the data volume of Framework data anticipated for access (geographic coverage, dataset size, feature count)?
Who are the primary organizations providing data for this project?

Status of Framework Client Development
What is the status of software development?
How will the client software be evaluated and quality-assured?
Describe your experience and purpose in accessing the data services?
Describe any internal or external users that are using this client.
Identify plans for the promotion and distribution of this software.

Project management
Will this project's activities continue in the future?
Describe the next phase in your project .
Requirements (more technical assistance, software, other?)
What areas need work?

Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program (to be completed for the final report)
What are the program strengths and weaknesses?
Where does the program make a difference?
Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective?
What would you recommend doing differently?
Are there factors that are missing or additional needs that should be considered?
Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed? Time frame?
If you were to do this again, what would you do differently?