skip
general nav links
About ACHP
ACHP News
National Historic
Preservation
Program
Working with
Section 106
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
Publications
Search |
|
skip
specific nav links
Home Working
with Section 106 ACHP
Case Digest Spring
2002 New York: Treatment of the Mechanicville
Hydroelectric Plant
New
York: Treatment of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant
Agency: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
The
fate of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant, possibly the only remaining
pre-1900 facility with its original equipment intact, is currently
being negotiated. In this case, a Federal agency accepted the license
surrender from the current owner of this National-Register property
prior to concluding Section 106 reviewa possible foreclosure
because the agency had determined that the proposed surrender would
constitute an adverse effect. ACHP took the unprecedented step of
filing a motion to intervene in this proceeding. |
The Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant includes a powerhouse, an earth
embankment, a concrete non-overflow dam, and a 700-feet-long concrete
gravity overflow dam. The plant was listed in the National Register of
Historic Places in 1989 for its demonstration of exemplary significance
in the fields of industry, architecture, and engineering. It is important
in the development of hydroelectric generation because it may be the only
remaining pre-1900 facility with its original equipment intact and was
the longest continuously operating hydroelectric project in New York until
operation ended in 1997.
The joint licensees for the property, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation,
which owns the plant, and Fourth Branch Associates, proposed to surrender
their license to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Niagara
Mohawk met with State agencies, including the New York State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO), regarding disposition and treatment of the
historic property, but neither ACHP nor FERC attended the meetings.
In 2000, ACHP took the unprecedented step of filing a motion to intervene
in the FERC proceeding. As an intervener, ACHP was ensured of receiving
all project documentation during the proceeding, and could, if necessary,
file for a rehearing.
In 2001, at FERCs behest, Niagara Mohawk submitted a plan for the
short and long term treatment of the project. ACHP, the SHPO, and Fourth
Branch Associates provided comments on the plan. Fourth Branch Associates
submitted a competing treatment plan for the project. That same year,
FERC issued a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for review and comment.
The draft EA included FERCs finding that surrender of the license
would be an adverse effect. The SHPO, ACHP, Niagara Mohawk and FBAM provided
comments.
In February 2002, FERC issued an Order Accepting License Surrender for
the Mechanicville Project. In the final EA, which was attached to the
order, FERC found that surrender of the license would be an adverse effect.
One of the conditions stipulated that Niagara Mohawk must, within 90 days
of the order, prepare and file for FERC approval a plan and schedule to
document the Mechanicville Projects historic resources per Federal
standards. Niagara Mohawk was to prepare the plan after consultation with
the SHPO and ACHP.
In April 2002, Niagara Mohawk began consulting with the SHPO regarding
the scope and content of the documentation effort in order to comply with
FERCs order. ACHP and Fourth Branch Associates filed for rehearing
on the basis that Section 106 review has not been appropriately concluded.
ACHP declined to participate formally in consultation with Niagara Mohawk
because of FERCs failure to correctly conclude Section 106 review.
The company plans to complete these responsibilities by December 2002.
That next month, FERC issued an Order Granting Rehearing for Further Consideration
for the Mechanicville project. FERC expects to issue an order on the merits
of this proceeding soon.
In the meantime, Niagara Mohawk stated that according to the structural
analysis that was recently completed for the project, safety is a real
concern. A hard winter and the attendant ice could cause the hydroelectric
plants dam to fail. To address this issue, Niagara Mohawk will fill
the forebay and tailrace water passages with concrete to maintain and
improve the structural stability of the powerhouse.
According to the company, it appears that the New York Canal Corporation
will take ownership of the dam. The dam and powerhouse share walls, but
the State agency does not want ownership of the powerhouse itself. A local
developer is interested in using the former powerhouse as a restaurant
and brew pub, and Niagara Mohawk says it is hopeful that information and
displays about this historic property can be incorporated into the design.
Staff contact: Laura
Henley Dean
Posted June 6, 2002
Return to Top |