skip
general nav links
About ACHP
ACHP News
National Historic
Preservation
Program
Working with
Section 106
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
Publications
Search |
|
skip
specific nav links
Home Working
with Section 106 ACHP
Case Digest Spring
2002 New Mexico and Arizona: Construction
of Fence Lake Mine
New
Mexico and Arizona: Construction of Fence Lake Mine
Agency: Office
of Surface Mining
In
a highly controversial case, a proposed surface coal mine and railroad
corridor could affect hundreds of archeological and traditional cultural
properties significant to numerous Indian tribes. |
The Fence Lake project is a proposed surface coal mine covering 16,800
acres in New Mexico, and a 44-mile railroad corridor that will be used
to transport coal to an existing generating station near St. Johns, Arizona.
The project is estimated to affect hundreds of archeological properties,
as well as several traditional cultural properties (TCPs) significant
to the Zuni, Hopi, Acoma, Laguna, and Navajo Tribes, including the National
Register-eligible Zuni Salt Lake Sanctuary Zone, a 182,000 acre TCP located
within and southeast of the mine area.
The project began when the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement
and Power District (SRP) applied to the Bureau of Land Management, Soccoro
Area Office (BLM), and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM) for approvals to construct and operate the mine and railroad corridor.
BLM, serving as lead agency for Section 106 review, consulted with a
host of groupsthe power district, OSM, ACHP, the Arizona and New
Mexico State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs), New Mexico Mining
and Mineral Division, and four Indian tribesto develop a Programmatic
Agreement for the undertaking.
The agreement was executed in 1993, establishing procedures for the identification
of historic properties and development of a comprehensive Treatment Plan
and Data Recovery Plans for historic properties affected by the project.
Archeological surveys and a TCP study were conducted, and after some debate,
the Zuni Salt Lake Sanctuary Zone was identified as a TCP and determined
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places by the Keeper of
the Register.
Despite its concurrence in the agreement, the Pueblo of Zuni has actively
opposed the construction of the mine. In addition to affecting the TCP
and archeological sites, the tribe has said that it is concerned that
the mining and transportation of coal in the vicinity of the Zuni Salt
Lake will adversely impact the water table and water quality at the lake.
At the request of the tribe, ACHP met with the Zuni Pueblo Governor and
Tribal Council in November 2001 to discuss the concerns with Section 106
compliance for the project.
ACHP supported the Pueblo of Zunis request for an amendment to
the agreement, to clarify that the Pueblos participation in the
agreement does not indicate its approval of the project. ACHP also supported
the Pueblos desire to have elders visit sites before archeological
data recovery is conducted, provided it could be done in a reasonable
time frame.
In April 2002, ACHP attended a meeting by BLM that provided the agreements
consulting parties with an opportunity to discuss possible mitigation
measures for the effects of the project on the Zuni Salt Lake Sanctuary
Zone and other TCPs. The meeting also allowed them to consider a proposed
amendment to the Programmatic Agreement and a draft Memorandum of Agreement
for the treatment of human remains.
At the meeting, the Pueblo of Zuni offered recommendations for the development
of a Treatment Plan. BLM has since developed a preliminary treatment plan
for traditional cultural properties, taking into account the recommendations
of the Zuni and others and has circulated it to the parties for comment.
Although SRP is moving forward with data recovery of archeological properties
along the railroad right-of-way, the Department of Interior has not yet
made a decision on whether to approve the mine plan for the project.
Staff contact: Carol
Gleichman
Posted June 4, 2002
Return to Top |