|
CDC/ATSDR Information Quality Peer Review |
| Peer Review Agenda
|
| Required Elements for Initial Public Posting on June 16 or December 16
|
| Title
|
| Components for the Evaluation of Direct-Reading Monitors for Gases and Vapors
|
| Subject
|
| Evaluation of instruments used to facilitate exposure assessment and assess intervention efficacy.
|
| Purpose
|
| To improve the monitoring of worker exposures to gases and vapors, using direct-reading instruments.
|
| Type of Review
|
| Individual Reviews
|
| Timing of Review
|
| Initial review in June 2002, additional statistical review in 2004, and review of the document’s addendum in August 2005
|
| Number of Reviewers
|
| 4 to 10
|
| Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise of Reviewers
|
| Industrial hygiene, chemistry, emergency response, statistics, chemical engineering
|
| Reviewers Selected by
|
| CDC/ATSDR
|
| Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel
|
| No
|
| Opportunities for the Public to Comment
|
| No
|
| Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments
|
| No
|
| Supplemental Elements that will be Added as they Become Available
|
| Peer Reviewers
|
|
Click Here
|
| Charge to Peer Reviewers
|
|
|
| |
| Peer Reviewers Comments
|
|
|
| TBD |
| CDC/ATSDR Response to Reviewers Comments
|
|
|
| TBD |
| The Dissemination Itself
|
|
|
| TBD |
