FY 2009 Funding and Operating Guidelines
|
| Grant Program | Percentile | Priority Score | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01, R21 | 12 .0 | Research Project Grant | |
| R01 New Investigator | 17 .0 | Research Project Grant | |
| Early Stage Investigator | 22.0 | Research Project Grants: if expedited administrative review resolves summary statement comments | |
| P01 | 140 | Program Project Grant | |
| P01 Subproject | 155 | Program Project: Subproject | |
SBIR |
190 | Small Business Innovation Research Grant | |
| STTR | 140 | Small Business Technology Transfer Grant | |
| K awards | 160 | Career Development Award | |
| T awards | 160 | Institutional NRSA Training | |
| F31, F32 | 40.0 | Pre and Post-doctoral NRSA |
Salary Cap:
The FY2009 salary cap is not yet available. The FY 2008 salary cap for individuals under an NIH grant or cooperative agreement was established by statute at $191,300. Information regarding the applicable law can be found at the following link: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-035.html.
New Competing (Type 1) Research Project Grants:
The NHLBI policy for new grants is to award them at the NHLBAC recommended level except for specific programmatic and administrative adjustments. All applications that do not exceed $250,000 direct costs in any given year of support in the recommended competitive segment will be awarded under the modular concept. Applications requesting direct costs that exceed $250,000 in any year of support in the recommended competitive segment will be awarded with categorical budgets. In addition, grantees should be aware that there is a new policy for both Type 1 and Type 2 resubmission applications submitted after January 25, 2009. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-003.html
Competing Renewal (Type 2) Research Project and MERIT Extension (Type 4) Awards:
The NHLBI policy for competing renewal and MERIT extension grants that will be awarded in FY 2009 differs depending upon the nature of the award in the preceding competitive segment and the likely form of the award for a competitive renewal. Please note that if a proposed award would result in a reduction greater than 25 percent from the requested amount in the application, NHLBI program staff will contact the PI and the applicant institution before an award is issued to obtain: either (a) a statement that the approved aims and objectives can be accomplished within the proposed level of support, or (b) a revised statement of aims and revised budget for the proposed level of support. In addition, grantees should be aware that there is a new policy for both Type 1 and Type 2 resubmission applications submitted after January 25, 2009. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-003.html
Categorical to Categorical:
For competing renewal and MERIT extension grants that were categorical awards in the preceding competitive segment and will be in excess of $250,000 direct costs in any given year in the recommended competitive segment, the Institute will award at the NHLBAC recommended direct cost up to a maximum of 3 percent (10 percent for MERIT extensions) above the level of the last non-competing award of the preceding competitive segment, except for specific programmatic and administrative adjustments that may be warranted. The maximum may be exceeded to accommodate non-recurring equipment costs. Consortia Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs are not considered in the direct cost base when calculating the maximum that can be requested.
Modular to Modular:
For competing renewal and MERIT extension grants that were modular awards in the preceding competitive segment and will be no more than $250,000 direct costs in any given year in the recommended competitive segment, the Institute will award at the NHLBAC recommended direct cost up to a maximum number of modules specified as follows:
If the previous award is 6 or fewer modules, the competing renewal may be up to one module more than the previous award. For example, if the last non-competing direct cost award was $150,000 (6 modules), the applicant would be allowed to apply for $175,000 (7 modules).
If the previous award is 7 or 8 modules, the competing renewal may not exceed two more modules than the previous award. For example, if the last non-competing direct cost award was $200,000 (8 modules), the applicant would be allowed to apply up to $250,000 (10 modules).
These modular caps may only be exceeded to accommodate specific programmatic and administrative adjustments that may be warranted or for non-recurring equipment costs. For example, if requested equipment costs total $15,000, a one-time request for an additional module may be made. However, if one-time equipment costs result in direct costs in excess of $250,000, the award will be made as categorical and so actual equipment costs will be awarded. Consortia F&A costs are not considered in the direct cost base when calculating the maximum that can be requested.
Modular to Categorical:
If the previous award is 9 or 10 modules, a requested increase will likely cause the competing renewal to be awarded as categorical. In all such cases, the Institute will award at the NHLBAC recommended direct cost up to a maximum of 3 percent (10 percent for MERIT extensions) above the level of the last non-competing award of the preceding competitive segment. The maximum may only be exceeded to accommodate specific programmatic and administrative adjustments that may be warranted or for non-recurring equipment costs. Consortia F&A costs are not considered in the direct cost base when calculating the maximum that can be requested.
Program Project Grants (Type 1 and Type 2):
Type 1: The direct cost award will not exceed $1,515,000. The F&A costs associated with subcontracts are not included in the $1,515,000. Annual increases for recurring costs in non-competing years will not be provided.
Type 2: Direct costs will be awarded at the same amount shown on the Notice of Award for the last noncompetitive segment. As with new awards, no annual increases for recurring costs in non-competing years will be provided.
Continuation Awards (Type 5 Noncompeting Renewal):
The NHLBI will award Type 5 RPGs in accordance with the NIH funding guidelines for FY2009 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-002.html). Under the discretion extended to each NIH Institute and Center, NHLBI non-competing awards with direct costs less than or equal to $250K will be awarded at the amount indicated for the FY 2009 budget period in the Notice of Award for the previous budget period.
All other RPGs with direct costs greater than $250K will be awarded at 90% of the amount indicated for the FY 2009 budget period in the Notice of Award for the previous budget year. (RPGs include the R01, R03, R21, R33, R24/25s, R35, R37, P01, U01, and U19 mechanisms.) The practice will also apply to all P30, P50, U10, U24, and U54 mechanisms in FY 2009. Future year budget periods will not be reduced.
Fellowship (F), Training (T), and Career Development (K) awards will be awarded at the full FY 2009 commitment levels, as will D43, R13, R15, SBIR/STTR, T15 and UH1 mechanisms.
Future Year Commitments on FY 2009 New and (Competing) Renewal Awards:
Generally, future year commitments on the Notice of Award will reflect no greater than an annual 3 percent escalation on recurring costs (e.g., Personnel, Supplies). Although the NHLBI remains committed at this time to funding at the recommended levels each year, fiscal constraints and NIH policy may necessitate future adjustments.
DURATION OF GRANTS
To achieve an average length of four years, the NHLBI will calculate
the average length of research project grants awarded at each meeting
of the NHLBAC. To reach the average length of four years, the Institute
will reduce RPGs recommended for five years to four years beginning
with those grants with the least favorable percentile scores and continuing
to those with the most favorable percentile scores until an average
of four years is achieved. However, no reduction will be made in the
recommended number of years for new investigators or in awards recommended
for less than four years.
| ESI | Non-ESI | |
|---|---|---|
| Payline: 5 percentile
points above the regular R01 payline |
Yes |
Yes |
| Expedited Review: to resolve comments in the summary statement if >5 but <=10 percentile points above the regular R01 payline |
Yes |
No |
| Duration of Grants | Funded for all years recommended | Number of years funded will be based on the policy to achieve an average length of four years for RPGs (see last paragraph on this webpage) |
 |
