Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Report Contents
 
Charge to the Panel
Panel Members
 
Fate & Biomonitoring
 
Sampling Methodologies
Health Endpoints
Susceptible Populations
Exposure Evaluation
Biomonitoring
 
Correlation of Data
 
Risk Management
 
Relocation Criteria
 
Reference Doses
 
Decontamination
 
Recommendations
 
Clinical Evaluation
 
Appropriate Triggers
Health Status
Environmental Medicine
 
Evaluation Protocol
 
Standardizing Lab Data
Treatment
Neurobehavioral Effects
Acute Poisoning
Suggested Evaluation
 
Overarching Issues
 
Recommendations
Field Survey
7-day Study
Dermal Absorption
Subchronic Toxicity
Pilot Study
Cohort Study
 
Selected References
 
Risk Communication
 
Workgroup
Recommendations
Operating Procedures
Management & Planning
Limitations of Strategies
Planning Steps
Identifying Populations
Preventing Exposures
Research Needs
Conclusions
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Evaluation Primer
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) 
Methyl Parathion Expert Panel Report
Health Education and Risk Communication Strategies


Standard Operating Procedures Should Include

  1. Identification of affected community members who can be consulted for advice on the design and dissemination of information materials. Representatives of affected community residents should be consulted at the earliest possible junction in the decision-making process.
  2. Immediate coordination with local authorities such as the local and regional departments of health, department of environmental protection, agricultural extension service. These officials may provide expert advice on specific features of the target communities and may also already have other programs that can provide a basic infrastructure for the implementation of the emergency MP program. The efforts of the local and federal agencies must be coordinated from the start so that potential conflicts can be resolved and division of labor can be accomplished smoothly.
  3. Pretesting of information materials before their release, to avoid misinforming the community. Because of agency time pressures during the MP crisis, it is understandable that pretesting was not done. However, a misinformed community can extremely time-consuming to manage. We recommend that in cases of emergencies such as MP exposures, a limited pretesting protocol can be implemented in which key community representatives are asked to review the materials for no more than a week. This protocol would help agencies avoid costly mistakes.
  4. Consultation with communication specialists, if not on staff. Specialists should be consulted at the earliest stages of the crisis, before any communication actions have been implemented. These specialists will help design a communication strategy and reduce the burden on the agencies responding to the emergency.

Top of Page


Revised April 24-25, 1997.