Home News Research Training Product Catalog Grants Navigation Imagemap


Ferguson - Would tribe be willing to release outline on map? If a project falls within that area contact Lorretta!

Rice - Do not want boundaries released?

Jackson - Possibility, lot of factors to consider before so doing. Education (within tribe) important for them. They do not have trained people, and that is not the Hualapai way! Better to work with agencies for internship programs.

Reid - Not all tribes are equivalent, 21 tribes in Arizona. Not all on same level. Politics also plays a major role. Think in terms of mid-range worse case scenario. Not have people available with whom to deal. Should not develop procedures to deal with best.

Pilles - Just WHO to deal.

Dongoske - Half burden of consultation is with the tribe.

Brunson -

Dongoske - Can consult with Office, village to village. Can always have problems.

Downum - Not always fed. agency that initiates. Could be state land. Not only uneven with tribes, but with state. At times contractors ignore consultation as no funds.

Gasser -

Rosenberg - What level do this at?

Downum - Can do equal harm with small projects.

Gasser - TCP problems all small projects.

Downum -

Gasser - Workshop on TCP policy next year (February). Almost need different policy for north and south Arizona.

Anyon/Gasser - Situation in NM different and does not meet tribal needs.

Brunson - If maps produced, get out to private entities and state agencies. Get word out to all tribes as a point of contact. Southern Tribes have done such a map says Gasser.

Ferguson - Private developers too?

Jump to Top


Phone: (318) 356-7444  ·  Fax: (318) 356-9119

NCPTT - National Center for Preservation Technology and Training
645 University Parkway
Natchitoches, LA 71457

Updated: Thursday, June 21, 2007
Published: Sunday, January 11, 2009


Contact NCPTT Webmaster