- Info
Director's Statement on Executive Order on Detentions, Interrogations
Statement to Employees by Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,
General Michael V. Hayden on the Executive Order on Detentions and Interrogations
July 20, 2007
Today, the President issued an Executive Order that
interprets the meaning and application of Common Article 3 of the Geneva
Conventions. The Order provides specific
requirements that ensure a CIA-run terrorist detention and interrogation
program would be in full compliance with US obligations under Common Article
3. It is the culmination of a process
begun just over a year ago, when the Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
that the provisions of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions apply to the
conflict with al-Qa’ida.
The CIA program that the President announced last September
always operated in strict accord with American law. It was carefully reviewed by the Department
of Justice, approved and re-approved by the National Security Council
Principals Committee, and repeatedly and fully briefed to our congressional
oversight committees—first to the leadership and then the full membership. But the Supreme Court’s decision changed the
legal landscape in which we operated. So
it was incumbent upon the Agency—and upon me personally—to seek guarantees that
any actions the CIA might take in the future regarding detainees would be, as
before, on a completely sound legal foundation.
Common Article 3 contains vague language that has been
subject to a variety of interpretations, not only within the US but
internationally. The President’s
action—along with the Military Commissions Act of 2006—gives us the legal
clarity we have sought. It gives our
officers the assurance that they may conduct their essential work in keeping
with the laws of the United
States. The Executive Order resolves any ambiguity by setting specific
requirements that, when met, represent full compliance with Common Article
3. Any CIA terrorist detention and
interrogation effort will, of course, meet those requirements.
Our chief tool in these interrogations has been
knowledge—knowledge of terrorists, their activities, and their
motivations. When used effectively, with
thorough access to a detainee, it offers the best chance of gaining critical
intelligence.
Those of you working the counterterrorism mission understand
better than anyone the value of this initiative. In the past five years, fewer than 100
hardened terrorists have been placed in the program, and just a fraction of
those—well under half—have ever required any sort of enhanced interrogation
measures. But our careful, professional
questioning of those men has produced thousands of intelligence reports,
revealed priceless insights on al-Qa’ida’s operations and organization, foiled
plots, and saved innocent lives.
Simply put, the information developed by our program has
been irreplaceable. If the CIA, with all
its expertise in counterterrorism, had not stepped forward to hold and
interrogate people like Abu Zubaydah and Khalid Shaykh Muhammad, the American
people would be right to ask why. We
have shouldered that responsibility for just one reason: to learn all we can
about our nation’s most deadly and fanatical enemies so that our operations to
undermine them are as effective as possible.
CIA took the steps dictated by good tradecraft and common
sense. Our country is safer for it. And the support that the President and the
Congress have given us is anchored by today’s Executive Order and by the
legislation that preceded it.
Bottom line: We can
focus on our vital work, confident that our mission and authorities are clearly
defined. Throughout the long fight ahead
against al-Qa’ida and its affiliates, we will exploit every opportunity to
expand our understanding of the enemy and his plans, and use that knowledge to
protect our Republic.
Mike Hayden
Historical Document
Posted: Jul 20, 2007 12:31 PM
Last Updated: Jun 18, 2008 09:40 AM
Last Reviewed: Jul 20, 2007 12:31 PM