News July-September 2004
News Release: September 15, 2004 | View Printable PDF Version |
Docket Number: RM04-12-000 |
Commission seeks comment on RTO/ISO financial reporting,
oversight and cost recovery practices
In order to provide greater transparency and more effective oversight,
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment
on the accounting, financial reporting and cost recovery practices
of regional transmission organizations (RTOs) and independent system
operators (ISOs).
Since 1997, the Commission has approved several
ISOs and RTOs, five of which have begun market operations. The operating
entities
are: PJM Interconnection; ISO New England; Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator; New York ISO; and California ISO.
The Commission has not mandated any particular business model
for RTOs and ISOs, which to date have all been not-for-profit
entities, making cost review more difficult.
Although there are
similarities among RTOs and ISOs, each developed independent of
the others, using different business models and
accounting designs. Moreover, there are significant differences
between RTOs/ISOs and vertically integrated public utilities,
including some of the functions they perform and the types of
costs they incur.
These differences have led the Commission to seek comment on:
- whether the Commission needs to adopt new regulations to better account for, and report RTO and ISO cost information;
- whether RTOs and ISOs have appropriate incentives to be cost efficient; and,
- whether the Commission’s rate review methods for RTOs and ISOs are sufficient.
More specifically, the current accounting
regulations, found in the Uniform System of Accounts,
were developed to capture information
about traditional public utilities’ primary business functions – generation,
transmission and distribution of electric energy. The primary
business functions of RTOs and ISOs differ from those of the traditional
public utility. As a result, the Commission’s current
accounting regulations and related financial reporting requirements
may not
provide sufficiently detailed information about the costs
incurred by RTOs and ISOs and their relationship to provided
services or
other business activities.
RTOs/ISOs develop their proposed rates
through a collaborative process with their respective
advisory processes. In general,
the RTO/ISO determines the cost side based on the level
of expenditures budgeted to accomplish its functions and
works with its stakeholders,
through the advisory committee process, to arrive at a
proposed allocation methodology. However, some RTO/ISO
stakeholders
have suggested that this process may be insufficient.
Comments on the
NOI are due November 4, 2004.
R-04-42
View Printable PDF Version |