Publications:
Two Deposit Insurance Funds: In the Public Interest?

Jennifer L.Eccles and John J. Feid

OCC Working Paper 97-5, February 1997.

Abstract
In 1996, considerable attention was focused on recapitalizing the SAIF and averting a default on FICO bond interest payments. Legislation passed in September 1996 dealt with these problems, and provided for the eventual merger of the funds if the thrift charter were eliminated. This paper analyzes some of the quantifiable economic benefits gained from merging the deposit insurance funds. It examines the historical reasons for maintaining separate funds, assesses the theoretical benefit from a merger, analyzes the historical evidence of such a benefit, and uses a value-at-risk framework to estimate the benefits of a merger of the funds. Combining the deposit insurance funds may result in a lower probability of fund insolvency from unanticipated economic shocks than keeping the funds separate. This risk-pooling benefit may result in a combined fund coverage requirement that is less than that required for separate funds and still provide the same buffer against unanticipated losses.

Disclaimer
As with all OCC Working Papers, the opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Department of the Treasury.

Any whole or partial reproduction of material in this paper should include the following citation: Eccles and Feid, "Two Deposit Insurance Funds: In the Public Interest?," Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, E&PA Working Paper 97-5, February 1997.

Availability
The complete paper is available in hard copy from the OCC's Communications Division. If you would like to receive a copy of a paper through the U.S. Postal Service:

• Write to the Communications Division, Mail Stop 3-3, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or
• click here to send an email request.